General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCORRECTION: Johnson did NOT say Ukraine had to stand on its own, as reported earlier
Earlier, this tweet was taken to mean Johnson in a closed meeting implied Ukraine should be abandoned:
Link to tweet
@JakeSherman
JOHNSON, in the closed GOP meeting, says that Ukraine needs to stand on its own.
Sherman has now corrected:
Link to tweet
@JakeSherman
POORLY WORDED! the Ukraine BILL. not Ukraine the country
Jake Sherman
@JakeSherman
JOHNSON, in the closed GOP meeting, says that Ukraine needs to stand on its own.
RockRaven
(14,977 posts)Will he vote for it? Will he whip votes for it? Will he allow a floor vote on it?
If not then the poor wording might be rather accurate.
rsdsharp
(9,188 posts)or will it just languish after the Israel bill passes?
Emrys
(7,246 posts)Link to tweet
@SpeakerJohnson
I have just spoken with the @HouseGOP
conference on my plan to address national security supplemental legislation on the growing security crises.
This week, we will consider separate bills with a structured and germane amendment process to:
Fund our ally Israel
Support Ukraine in its war against Russian aggression
Strengthen our allies in the Indo-Pacific
Pass additional measures to counter our adversaries and strengthen our national security
Alhena
(3,030 posts)Normally, it is nearly unheard of for one party to vote for another party's "rule" - which is a weird House procedural vehicle for bringing a bill to the floor. But MTG and some other Republicans will certainly vote against the rule on this bill, which means that Democrats will have to decide whether to vote for it or not.
Are Democrats really going to say that they allowed Ukraine to get nothing just because they didn't want to vote for a Republican rule?
The only reason I can see that being justifiable is if we think we can get the discharge petition on the Senate bill passed. And that may be more possible now, assuming that Dem progressive holdouts finally decide to sign it because Johnson's bill gives even more money to Israel than the Senate bill, and with less humanitarian relief for Gaza.
So if we can get the discharge petition to work then fine, don't vote for the rule. But if not, then vote for the rule- we can't let Ukraine get nothing.
Emrys
(7,246 posts)who so far refused to support the disharge petition. It sounds like Johnson anticipates a lot of amendments to the bills anyway, so this could get messy and protracted.
I hope Biden and Pelosi's legislative experience and wiliness may help things along tactically.
Coventina
(27,129 posts)who benefits?
I think it's a certain Russian is stirring the pot,
You probably know him,, his last name stats with a "p"