Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJennifer Rubin: The worst mainstream media habit: Distorting polls for clicks
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/04/16/polling-distortion-new-york-times/
https://archive.ph/WbB5w
By now, my readers know full well what I think of national polls taken nearly seven months before the election: They are worse than meaningless. Pervasive polling obsession winds up misinforming (and freaking out) voters while crowding out the essential aspects of a historic campaign. For starters, constant polling hype frames the election as a horse race, devoid of moral or policy outcomes. Premature polling distracts us from what is critical and central four-times indicted former president Donald Trumps unprecedented attack on democracy. (When you want to suspend the Constitution, use a putsch to overturn the will of the voters, unleash the military on civilians and weaponize the Justice Department, you are pining to undermine democracy and turn America into something resembling Viktor Orbans Hungary.)
At its worst, coverage of polling misleads voters. Consider the opening of a recent New York Times article. President Biden has nearly erased Donald J. Trumps early polling advantage, amid signs that the Democratic base has begun to coalesce behind the president despite lingering doubts about the direction of the country, the economy and his age, according to a new survey by the New York Times and Siena College, writes Shane Goldmacher. This is false. The previous poll was well within the margin of error; the poll Goldmacher is hawking is within the margin of error. There has been no statistical change. The narrative of Biden behind! Now, hes catching up! is mathematically inaccurate. And yet, the poll sets up a narrative and frames coverage Why has Trump lost his lead? Can Biden sustain his comeback? all based on a false premise.
Even if outlets presented polling honestly (i.e., The poll shows the race is now statistically tied but our poll does not predict the future), the obsessive focus on polling as if it were the news itself would distort perception of the race for a simple reason: We cannot know in April who will win in November. This realization will shock those grasping at polls for emotional solace during a hair-raising election season. However, too many people who will vote in seven months have yet to pay attention to the race. Moreover, too many events are still to happen between now and November to enable us to say the race then will look the way the polls do now. An infinite number of variables (e.g., Trump could be convicted, Trump could be acquitted, a wider Middle East war could break out, Biden could negotiate a Middle East peace deal) are at play. Just think how a single speech, Bidens State of the Union, affected voters perception. Polling before that event that didnt account for it appeared even less relevant in retrospect.
Poll defenders will say, The poll just shows what would happen if the election were today! But the election is not today and everything between now and then will determine the outcome. So whats the point of polling in April? Honestly, it is a cheaply obtained, lazy way to generate an audience. Early polling rarely reflects the outcome. Too much (its called the campaign) happens in the interim. That was true in 2020, 2016, 2012 and 2008. Pollsters struggle with extremely low response rates and uncertainty in determining who will vote months from now. But the problem is more basic. Brian Klaas, a political scientist and author of the fascinating book Fluke: Chance, Chaos, and Why Everything We Do Matters, told an interviewer in January: I have no idea whos going to win the 2024 election. Its impossible to say, and thats because the world is going to change drastically in the next 10 months or so. He adds that anyone who tells you, Oh, I know exactly whats going on, theyre just lying to you. Maybe they are just desperately trying to sell newspapers, draw eyeballs and attract clicks.
snip
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 370 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jennifer Rubin: The worst mainstream media habit: Distorting polls for clicks (Original Post)
Celerity
Apr 16
OP
Walleye
(31,030 posts)1. I know, I keep thinking about Hillary's campaign was sunk 11 days before the election
Fiendish Thingy
(15,631 posts)2. The focus should be on the stakes, not the odds. Nt