with a maga-juror candidate, and gets a wink indicating “I’ve got your back, sir”, then treason wins again.

Do I dislike him, sure

But impartial in jury legalese means can I vote guilty or not guilty based on what I hear in a court room. Can I apply the basic argument equation of

evidence plus reasoning --> conclusion

I think even the most die hard of us here could. If the prosecution failed to prove its case, we would vote not guilty because we believe in the rule of law. Period. I believe we are a country of laws and must live up to that.

I don't live in the jurisdiction of any of TFG cases, but I could be legally impartial.

I think one can go in, already assuming the defendant is a criminal, and still compartmentalize the specific case at hand.
That's how some mob bosses got acquitted. Who didn't know Gotti was a crook? But, aside from tampering, the state couldn't prove guilt IN THAT CASE! So, those jurors did their job just fine.
Like you, I think I could do it too.

Maybe one can be impartial, but Trump sure makes finding guilt easy.

But being very honest with myself…I know I couldn’t. He took an oath, he recited a vow, to the American populace that he would do his best to uphold the laws of the land. To protect and preserve the Constitution.

He shattered his oath. He never had any intention of “protecting and preserving” … he lied on the podium taking the oath of office.

Yes, I’m a better American than he is, way better. That is one reason I would have to refuse to do that service.

secret trumpers. Or, of course, both.