Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orangecrush

(19,595 posts)
Thu Apr 18, 2024, 10:49 AM Apr 18

Another juror under scrutiny after 1 is excused


Following the loss of Juror. No. 2, attorneys are now discussing an issue with yet another juror -- Juror No. 4 -- after Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass said the the DA's team did research that "possibly called into question the veracity" of the answers he gave on the jury questionnaire.

Steinglass said a person with the same name as Juror No. 4 -- the Puerto Rican man who said he found Trump "fascinating and mysterious" -- had been arrested in the 1990s in Westchester for "tearing down political advertisements."

“I actually believe the propaganda that was being ripped down was political posters that were on the right -- the political right," Steinglass said.

He suggested that Juror No. 4's answer to question 19 on the questionnaire -- if you have ever been accused or convicted of committing a crime -- then "was not accurate."

https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-updates/trump-hush-money-trial/?id=108402689

I'm glad they caught this.

For it to come out during or after the trial would be a disaster.





12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another juror under scrutiny after 1 is excused (Original Post) orangecrush Apr 18 OP
sounds like he "wanted" to be on the jury too much WarGamer Apr 18 #1
This is a win orangecrush Apr 18 #9
When I was called for Jury duty on a criminal sexual assault case. ProudMNDemocrat Apr 18 #2
After a brief break, they're bringing this juror back in for more questioning n/t Drum Apr 18 #3
i hope there's a penalty besides being dismissed. mopinko Apr 18 #4
He might not have been dishonest Jersey Devil Apr 18 #5
It certainly CAN be a felony, but it varies by state MagickMuffin Apr 18 #10
Judge has lost control of his courtroom. MOMFUDSKI Apr 18 #6
One of the more ridiculous comments I've seen here about the trial onenote Apr 18 #11
No, he hasn't. Ocelot II Apr 20 #12
Juror No. 4 dismissed. Drum Apr 18 #7
Better now orangecrush Apr 18 #8

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,786 posts)
2. When I was called for Jury duty on a criminal sexual assault case.
Thu Apr 18, 2024, 11:00 AM
Apr 18

I put down on the questionnaire that I could not be impartial.

My reasoning was one of my sisters was sexually assaulted. This was after then Gov. Ronald Reagan closed down the mental hospitals in California for which the person had been a patient of.

I was excused.

Jersey Devil

(9,874 posts)
5. He might not have been dishonest
Thu Apr 18, 2024, 11:53 AM
Apr 18

A charge of tearing down political posters was almost certainly not a felony and in many states when asked if you had been convicted of a "crime", misdemeanors and offenses lower than a felony would not be considered a "crime".

MagickMuffin

(15,950 posts)
10. It certainly CAN be a felony, but it varies by state
Thu Apr 18, 2024, 12:55 PM
Apr 18


From https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/is-it-illegal-to-steal-or-vandalize-political-signs/

Theft and Vandalism Laws Vary by State

States take slightly different approaches to how they penalize theft and vandalism of political yard signs, but most states treat the conduct as a misdemeanor. Even though misdemeanors are minor offenses, they do carry serious consequences that can multiply based on the number of signs involved.

Research the misdemeanor laws in your state to find out the penalty that could apply. Misdemeanors often carry up to a $1,000 fine and up to 90 days or even a year in jail. In states like New York, if the property stolen or damaged was worth more than $1,000, the offender could be charged with a felony.


Criminal trespass, which refers to intentionally entering someone else's private property without their permission, is also often treated as a misdemeanor with a maximum penalty of a $1,000 fine and up to 90 days or a year in jail.

Increased theft and vandalism of political signs has prompted some property owners to attempt to catch trespassers by installing cameras such as security cameras, smart video doorbells, or trail cams. The footage is being used to shame people online and also helps law enforcement track down offenders.

Being charged with any crime, including a misdemeanor, can negatively affect your life, so anyone charged with stealing or defacing political lawn signs should get advice from a criminal defense lawyer.


onenote

(42,736 posts)
11. One of the more ridiculous comments I've seen here about the trial
Thu Apr 18, 2024, 01:01 PM
Apr 18

How, exactly, has Judge Merchan "lost control"? There is a motion pending for the imposition of sanctions on Trump for violating the gag order. Merchan has scheduled a hearing. BTW, none of those alleged violations occurred in the courtroom.

Ocelot II

(115,804 posts)
12. No, he hasn't.
Sat Apr 20, 2024, 01:40 PM
Apr 20

Have you ever been a judge? Tried a case? Watched a judge at work behind the scenes? He's doing a very good job, especially considering what he's stuck with.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another juror under scrut...