Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

David__77

(23,484 posts)
Thu Apr 18, 2024, 09:09 PM Apr 18

U.S. vetoes widely supported UN resolution backing full UN membership for Palestine

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The United States vetoed a widely backed U.N. resolution on Thursday that would have paved the way for full United Nations membership for the state of Palestine.

The vote in the 15-member Security Council was 12 in favor, the United States opposed and two abstentions.

The resolution would have recommended that the 193-member General Assembly, where there are no vetoes, approve Palestine becoming the 194th member of the United Nations. Some 140 countries have already recognized the state of Palestine, so its admission would have been approved.

This is the second Palestinian attempt to become a full member of the United Nations, and it comes as the war in Gaza, now in its seventh month, has put the more than 75-year-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict at center stage.



https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/world/u-s-vetoes-widely-supported-un-resolution-backing-full-un-membership-for-palestine

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. vetoes widely supported UN resolution backing full UN membership for Palestine (Original Post) David__77 Apr 18 OP
Good news, that resolution was a joke. tritsofme Apr 18 #1
Voting rights then otherwise racist apartheid David__77 Apr 18 #2

tritsofme

(17,398 posts)
1. Good news, that resolution was a joke.
Thu Apr 18, 2024, 09:11 PM
Apr 18

Hamas is still the elected government of Gaza.

The incredibly unpopular Abbas is serving in year 19 of his single five year term as “president”

Who will run this “state”? Maybe at least figure that out first?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. vetoes widely suppor...