Opening Ceremonies.
Was clear they don’t like Trump (which I appreciate) but neither was worth the air time they were given.

and the Iowa diner coffee klatch interviews - that everyone derides so bitterly.
(And, have to agree - as far as useful content or commentary ... Pretty much nil. Other hand - we've had 'journalists' making their living on 'man in the street' interviews - pretty much forever too .. )

but they're kids! Can't we cut them some slack for not using the correct legal terminology?

behind a screen and take pot shots. Shame on you

They said nothing
Just the truth

They were probably lucky to get in. I'm surprised they were even able to get in. Most there were likely journalists and other adults.

Sure, by age 14 they know about sex and what a prostitute is. But I'm thinking back to a different time period when it would have been thought inappropriate for young teens to attend a trial about such a "tawdry" subject as porn stars and presidential candidates covering up hired sexual encounters.

I couldn't get over how the kid's appearance and voice reminded me of Sam.

The resemblance was so remarkable that I did catch his name when Chris Jansing thanked them at the end.

Aaron Berenbaum

The spoke what they spoke based on a young person's impression of what they saw.

I enjoyed listening. Even as they didn't really understand it all, they took good views of what they saw.

But in the end, They were two kids. Leave them alone.

"Opening ceremony"? So what. They were kids who took the initiative to be there for history.

Kudos to them.

Period!!!

They made more sense then some adults. I was impressed.

They provided insight from their perspective.

And they appeared to see thru the stupidity of the defense attorney. And also reported trump nodding off.

they took the initiative to go observe the trial which I think speaks very well of them. Their observations were not unlike the pundits who are also observing.