General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGeorge Will wakes up to see his monster
20 April 2024
Washington Post
Some gems and dead-on accusations by George Will
N.B:
A simple majority - 216 of all votes - was needed for passage.
On Ukraine: 311 - 112. All 112 were Republicans.
Voted to endanger civilization. Voted to enhance their political security. Voted to assure the erasure a European nation.
Will then goes on to add:
Awwww. Give yourself some credit, George! You were there flogging the myth of the purity and sureness of Republican governing along the with the rest of the Reich-wing media, feeding the Reich's army of Armageddon-craving, gullible, imbeciles.
And Reagan. It all points back to Reagan. Nixon being dead. That must have hurt George, because in the 1980's he regularly burnish Reagan's balls to a high sheen.
The wind-up:
And by "We", he means "Republicans." 112 Republicans VOTED to look the other way on bombardments, ethnic cleansing, rape, torture, and the abduction of children.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/04/24/ignoble-house-republicans-against-ukraine-aid/
Ocelot II
(115,866 posts)And I can't argue with this:
It includes Missouris Sen. Josh Hawley, who thinks we have given blank checks to Ukraine (actually, 5 percent of defense spending, and less than half the monetary value of European support). Yet Hawley says we cannot defend both Ukraine and Taiwan, so this would be an excellent time to reduce the U.S. forces in Europe that are deterring Russia from aggressions against NATO allies. Another grotesque, Ohios Sen. J.D. Vance, an itinerant Neville Chamberlain visiting green rooms, would welcome Ukraines death on the installment plan (see Czechoslovakia in 1938-1939). Georgias Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (she who wonders whether Jewish space lasers cause forest fires) expresses her loathing of Ukraine with lunatic accusations that confirm the judgment of Texass Rep. Michael McCaul (Republican chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee) that Russian propaganda has infected a good chunk of my partys base.
Grins
(7,231 posts)I am so stealing that line!
Mme. Defarge
(8,044 posts)laughed out loud at this one.
Charging Triceratops
(168 posts)... the GOPigs spit in these heroes' freedom-fighting faces.
Happy Hoosier
(7,393 posts)he certainly embraced the Southern Strategy when it benefited him, thosugh he was always careful to maintain a sanitary distance from the culuture warriors (and blame The Left whenever possible).
The title of your post is completely accurate. He helped create this monster, and now he's shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, that these Dogs of War he helped create are, in fact, eating the face of Democracy.
underpants
(182,884 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 25, 2024, 11:02 AM - Edit history (1)
They got ahold of it and knew every point Carter was going to make. The big moment came when Carter directly pointed to something (I forgot the point and its been swept away by history ) to which Reagan couldnt have a response to. They crafted Ronnie response as Well, there you go again in a demeaning Im the adult here kind of way. The press mustve been prepped for that response because they ate it up. Its still lauded as a great debate moment.
Will, years later, tried to claim he didnt do it because Mr. Fancy Conservative Intellectual now. Young Republican writers (York, Coulter, Goldberg, etc.) in the 90s wrote almost required articles to re-write Wills history. It was like each ones assigned term paper.
dsc
(52,166 posts)and when Reagan ran for reelection in the first debate he tried it again and this time Mondale flattened him by reminding everyone of when he said it and that Carter had been dead right as to what he would do as Reagan had indeed cut both programs.
underpants
(182,884 posts)Isnt it odd how that part seems to be left out of clips?
Uncle Joe
(58,425 posts)In every image that I can recall of him, he was always leaning to the right.
fizzix137
(21 posts)Always a pompous ass spouting conservative lies each week on Brinkley's excellent show. I will never forget his ridiculous defense that the Republicans were not all racists. Bill Maher was the guest commentator and delivered the line that I still use to this day. "Not all Republicans are racists, but all racists are Republicans." Will looked like he had just eaten a bug.
SarahD
(1,240 posts)According to the no true Scotsman rule, today's Republicans are not true Republicans because they are not motivated by the correct kind of conservative thought.
JohnnyRingo
(18,648 posts)His op-eds are in my local paper, and he's not at all happy about what has happened to his party.
He's best described as a Reagan Republican.
KS Toronado
(17,337 posts)Caliman73
(11,744 posts)What separates Reagan from Trump is personality and what was possible given the political and media climate of the time. Reagan was reportedly making deals with Iran during the election, though it has never been definitively proven. His administration sold Iran missiles, even though they were a "State Sponsor of Terrorism" and funneled money illegally to Right Wing death squads in Central America, trained, also illegally by the US. People went down for those crimes but Bill Barr and GHW Bush tidied up the mess and most of the actors got away with their illegal acts.
Conservatism holds that there is a "natural hierarchy" in society that should be upheld by law. It is an inherently unequal philosophy and if left to its own progression, will lead to authoritarianism. If you just give it a bit of thought, how can it not? Conservatism as a political ideology was born out of the defense of the concept of Monarchy. During the American and French Revolutions, aristocrats were trying to make the case, if not directly for hereditary monarchy and aristocracy, for the structures that supported it. Conservatism, though different in different countries, has never strayed from the belief that certain people are just naturally "better" than others and those better people deserved to make the rules and reap the rewards of society relative to their importance.
Reagan was a trained actor. He was good at making pitches and sounding folksy. He wasn't a particularly talented actor like say Sir Lawrence Olivier, or Cary Grant, etc... but he was a talented pitchman. Trump is simply a narcissistic failson, who had he not been born into wealth, would likely have ended up in prison, or dead for his penchant toward illicit activity. Make no mistake however, Nixon's actions lead to Reagan, which lead to W Bush, which led to Trump and the stated of Conservatism and the GOP today. Trump isn't an aberration, he is what happens to right wing ideology sooner or later. You see the same with Orban in Hungary, Le Penn in France, Meloni (the actual fascist) in Italy, and Putin in Russia. These are right wing leaders.
crickets
(25,983 posts)misanthrope
(7,428 posts)I firmly believe that the selection of rabidly unhinged and low-brow Sarah Palin as the GOP's VP candidate in '08 was critical in leading voters to their comfort in voting for Trump 8 years later.
Kid Berwyn
(14,965 posts)"...might yet predominate."
Fake journalist George Will hit the nail on the head re 112 GOP members who voted against military aid for Ukraine.
jaxexpat
(6,851 posts)Basket of deplorables was perfect.
Wednesdays
(17,412 posts)Opposed to the expansion of the Russian Empire. Which means, he's a dying breed in the new GOP.
UpInArms
(51,284 posts)George Will-you-go-the-fuck-away