Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSauer is arguing that appointing false electors is an official duty of the president, along with communicating with
state officials who determine election outcome.
Why is this even being entertained?
This is advocating an end of our Democracy.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 726 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sauer is arguing that appointing false electors is an official duty of the president, along with communicating with (Original Post)
JohnSJ
Apr 25
OP
JustAnotherGen
(31,906 posts)1. How do I listen?
JohnSJ
(92,411 posts)3. If you can get C-Span. I suspect through the internet or TV.
Wednesdays
(17,412 posts)6. The audio is also playing on CNN now. nt
JustAnotherGen
(31,906 posts)11. Thanks
On my phone on youtube!
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,617 posts)10. C-Span, two ways:
"Video," in the sense that C-Span identifies the speaker:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?534673-1/supreme-court-hears-case-president-trumps-immunity-claim&live
Audio:
https://www.c-span.org/networks/?channel=radio
malaise
(269,182 posts)2. Arguing that so is a coup
One more SF
EarlG
(21,968 posts)4. That was brutal
Trump's lawyer sounded completely defeated in that moment. Imagine trying to argue that a president should have immunity for a military coup if he lost the election because it would be an "official act."
MOMFUDSKI
(5,666 posts)7. While the SC stages their own coup on the
US.
Sympthsical
(9,120 posts)5. "Is a military coup an official act?"
"Well, maybe . . ."
Jesus.
Emile
(22,937 posts)8. Blowing smoke out his ass arguments. LOL
LiberalFighter
(51,095 posts)9. Could the President declare Sauer to be an insurrectionist?
And order Seal Six to take him out?
The Magistrate
(95,255 posts)12. Hard To See What Objection HE Could Make, Sir
"Kill one, warn one hundred."