Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnSJ

(92,409 posts)
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 11:46 AM Apr 25

Alito is actually suggesting that immunity makes sense to avoid retribution from political opponents in a close election

How about NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.

Some of these arguments from the MALE CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES are that "grand juries", can indict anyone without necessary substance.

What are they suggesting? That the president who tried to overturn an election in front of everyone's lying eyes is without merit?

This is so depressing.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alito is actually suggesting that immunity makes sense to avoid retribution from political opponents in a close election (Original Post) JohnSJ Apr 25 OP
At least they are letting us know they don't believe in the law. SamKnause Apr 25 #1
Now the headline says oral arguments MOMFUDSKI Apr 25 #2
Who needs immunity when it takes 4 years to get someone in a court of law? bucolic_frolic Apr 25 #3
Some musclecar6 Apr 25 #4
So, if he's suggesting that America's legal system is corrupt, then he needs sinkingfeeling Apr 25 #5
"...retribution from political opponents in a close election" Grins Apr 25 #6

SamKnause

(13,110 posts)
1. At least they are letting us know they don't believe in the law.
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 11:49 AM
Apr 25

They are sickening ignorant trump cultists.

I don't think they have an ounce of common sense.

MOMFUDSKI

(5,659 posts)
2. Now the headline says oral arguments
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 11:51 AM
Apr 25

suggest the SC may not be able to resolve the immunity case. Depressing indeed.

bucolic_frolic

(43,296 posts)
3. Who needs immunity when it takes 4 years to get someone in a court of law?
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 11:53 AM
Apr 25

I don't think these bastards are so much invested in Trump as they are in dictatorship - Barr's Unitary Executive Theory. Probably a Leo brand.

musclecar6

(1,690 posts)
4. Some
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 12:05 PM
Apr 25

Like RGB, Sotomayor and other very high caliber Justices who have notably served us on the United States Supreme Court are to be admired and held in high regard. That said, there are others like Alito and many others that I run around with my mouth wide open and eyes wide open, when I hear their thinking on things of great import. Just because you somehow weaselled your way onto the Supreme Court, doesn’t mean you’re really any fucking good.

Just because you got elected president, with Putin’s help of course, doesn’t mean you’re any fucking good. We have to stop putting people on pedestals when they don’t deserve it. The true test of anybody is whatever field they’re in, are they any good at it. Mic drop.

sinkingfeeling

(51,474 posts)
5. So, if he's suggesting that America's legal system is corrupt, then he needs
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 12:24 PM
Apr 25

to look to his right and to his left and in a mirror. Because the SCOTUS sure is.

Grins

(7,231 posts)
6. "...retribution from political opponents in a close election"
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 12:26 PM
Apr 25

About which “Strip Search Sammy” Alito said nothing when Trump and the Reich-wing screamed “Lock her up!” during - a close election.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alito is actually suggest...