General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsListening to the Supremes this morning, it occurs to me that Justice Jackson is the smartest of the three smartest on...
...the court.
irisblue
(33,033 posts)Emile
(22,927 posts)mobeau69
(11,156 posts)Jerry2144
(2,111 posts)As for the six corrupt ones
On my right, I have six boxes of rocks. Each is smarter than those 6. More honest and less dirty, too
msfiddlestix
(7,286 posts)DET
(1,324 posts)And she doesnt take any crap. The woman has spunk.
in a quiet, firm way. Her questions are concise and on point. She doesn't engage in verbosity to illustrate that she's smarter than you. She just is.
ashredux
(2,609 posts)Comfortably_Numb
(3,827 posts)PatSeg
(47,602 posts)Trueblue Texan
(2,443 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,373 posts)I must be hallucinating!
Texin
(2,597 posts)MontanaMama
(23,337 posts)lark
(23,156 posts)How will she vote, though? How can one trust an actual Handmaiden?
MontanaMama
(23,337 posts)I guess we're about to find out...on this case anyway.
lark
(23,156 posts)She is the Handmaiden, after all. I'm just surprised she's not as full on fascist as the rest of the R's.
ecstatic
(32,731 posts)She helped overturn Roe v Wade. I guess she got her tubes tied? Because if not, her head is on the chopping block too. A baby making machine who can still find herself pregnant at the tender age of 52 if she has not completed menopause yet.
yorkster
(1,506 posts)as she was this am with Sauer.
Raven123
(4,867 posts)Others seemed a little fragmented, but thats often the case. Like listening to these arguments even when I have trouble following the thought lines
crud
(624 posts)When she said that the criminal acts of a president should have (at the least) equal weight with the concept that a president might be constrained in his official duties. She gets to the heart of the matter, by looking at the broad implications, that it is better to prevent lawlessness than it is to allow it. Seems to me that when you look at the immunity argument that way, it turns it on its head. What will do more harm? Allowing an all powerful president to act unlawful would be much more harmful to the country than an ex-president facing charges.
gab13by13
(21,405 posts)is very good friends with Jackson, their kids go to the same school.
Daughter may get a chance to meet her.
Trueblue Texan
(2,443 posts)IrishAfricanAmerican
(3,818 posts)she would have to be.
LeftInTX
(25,556 posts)I did a deep dive on it a few weeks ago, because it sparked my attention for some reason.
The State of Oregon has already made the anti-homeless law null and void...So why is it before the Supreme Court?
She was the one who noticed this.
BWdem4life
(1,697 posts)A Black female has to be better than any of her counterparts to reach the same position, in this country at this time. Wonder if that will ever change.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)Glamrock
(11,802 posts)Havent heard this case yet. Hopefully she changes my mind.
elleng
(131,129 posts)Was not home earlier (in Bawlmer!) so just watching now.
Here's one, plze don't hold it against me, but what if Amy C-B proves to be the true conservative? May have seen hints, here and elsewhere.
Stinky The Clown
(67,819 posts). . . . would side with The three liberals.
elleng
(131,129 posts)yorkster
(1,506 posts)elleng
(131,129 posts)spooky3
(34,481 posts)The male justices. If thats not a good argument for diversity, I dont know what is.