Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew UK law criminalizing creating deepfake porn requires proving malicious intent. "Amusement" or "artistry" might be OK
BBC article from last week, then more from Glamour magazine article a couple of days ago:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-68823042
The creation of sexually explicit "deepfake" images is to be made a criminal offence in England and Wales under a new law, the government says.
-snip-
It will apply regardless of whether the creator of an image intended to share it, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said.
-snip-
Clare McGlynn, a law professor at Durham University who specialises in legal regulation of pornography and online abuse, told the Today programme the legislation has some limitations.
She said it "will only criminalise where you can prove a person created the image with the intention to cause distress", and this could create loopholes in the law.
-snip-
-snip-
It will apply regardless of whether the creator of an image intended to share it, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said.
-snip-
Clare McGlynn, a law professor at Durham University who specialises in legal regulation of pornography and online abuse, told the Today programme the legislation has some limitations.
She said it "will only criminalise where you can prove a person created the image with the intention to cause distress", and this could create loopholes in the law.
-snip-
https://www.glamourmagazine.co.uk/article/new-deepfake-laws-whats-next-opinion
The first concrete step is to ensure the new law is comprehensive, covering anyone who deliberately makes a sexually explicit deepfake without consent. Unfortunately, the governments current proposal is limited, requiring proof the perpetrator is motivated by sexual gratification or causing distress. This wont include men claiming artistic motives or saying theyre only having a laugh. Also, even if the perpetrators are trying to cause distress, actually proving it is difficult.
We should name this abuse for what it is creating a digital forgery. Its stealing someones likeness and sexual identity, creating a false representation of someone. Its non-consensual conduct: neither the porn actor nor the woman whose image is imposed into the porn has consented to their images and identities being used in this way, and we dont allow such false claims in other walks of life.
The current proposal will also create unjustifiable differences. If someone takes an image of you sleeping nude without your consent, itll be an offence, whatever their motives. But, if they take an image of you clothed, then use AI to make it nude, it will only be an offence if there is actual proof their purpose was causing distress or sexual gratification. Most women will recognise both acts as being intrusive and violating, regardless of the motives, and wont accept them being treated differently. As the Revenge Porn Helpline says, motive requirements will make any new law difficult to evidence, charge and prosecute.
-snip-
A comprehensive criminal law makes clear that deepfake sexual abuse websites and apps have no lawful purpose, empowering us to impose greater obligations on the internet services that are facilitating and encouraging deepfake sexual abuse. That means challenging the payment providers that continue to prop up the deepfake financial ecosystem; saying to Google and Bing they can no longer highly rank deepfake porn sites and apps; making YouTube remove the videos telling people how to create sexually explicit deepfakes; removing adverts for nudify apps on mainstream social media such as X (formerly Twitter).
-snip-
We should name this abuse for what it is creating a digital forgery. Its stealing someones likeness and sexual identity, creating a false representation of someone. Its non-consensual conduct: neither the porn actor nor the woman whose image is imposed into the porn has consented to their images and identities being used in this way, and we dont allow such false claims in other walks of life.
The current proposal will also create unjustifiable differences. If someone takes an image of you sleeping nude without your consent, itll be an offence, whatever their motives. But, if they take an image of you clothed, then use AI to make it nude, it will only be an offence if there is actual proof their purpose was causing distress or sexual gratification. Most women will recognise both acts as being intrusive and violating, regardless of the motives, and wont accept them being treated differently. As the Revenge Porn Helpline says, motive requirements will make any new law difficult to evidence, charge and prosecute.
-snip-
A comprehensive criminal law makes clear that deepfake sexual abuse websites and apps have no lawful purpose, empowering us to impose greater obligations on the internet services that are facilitating and encouraging deepfake sexual abuse. That means challenging the payment providers that continue to prop up the deepfake financial ecosystem; saying to Google and Bing they can no longer highly rank deepfake porn sites and apps; making YouTube remove the videos telling people how to create sexually explicit deepfakes; removing adverts for nudify apps on mainstream social media such as X (formerly Twitter).
-snip-
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 182 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New UK law criminalizing creating deepfake porn requires proving malicious intent. "Amusement" or "artistry" might be OK (Original Post)
highplainsdem
Apr 25
OP
speak easy
(9,315 posts)1. Thought Crime.
CrispyQ
(36,518 posts)2. It just feels like the perverts are winning. Worldwide.
That all of society is sinking to the lowest common denominator.