1) The framers of the Constitution did not view women as citizens therefore women should not be allowed to run for president. If they do run and somehow managed to get elected that election should be null and void.

2) No one - even a woman who is president - is above the law, and therefore she should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. This may seem to contradict what I'm about to rule in the Trump immunity hearing, but the differences are just too esoteric and based in 17th century law for your tiny female minds to comprehend.

that he read somewhere that testosterone is more important than estrogen and therefore....something.....something.

If the sitting President deams current Supreme Court justices illegitimate and a threat to democracy, can he have ST6 bust in during arguments and just remove them with extreme prejudice in order to open up seats that said President could then backfill with acceptable jurists?

Would she be allowed to bring her Presidency to term?

If she had an abortion somewhere else, it wouldn't be any of Idaho's business.

Would that be immune? It’s obvious Alito is stalling for Trump. All the other justices will have to wait till he writes his dissenting opinion. Then it will be too late. Something needs to hold him
Accountable.

Good question
Great rejoinders

Link to tweet

Kicking this back to the top for the entertaining discussion.