Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDonald Trump had a fantastic day in the Supreme Court today
Donald Trump had a fantastic day in the Supreme Court todayThursdays argument in Trump v. United States was a disaster for Special Counsel Jack Smith, and for anyone who believes that the president of the United States should be subject to prosecution if they commit a crime.
At least five of the Courts Republicans seemed eager to, at the very least, permit Trump to delay his federal criminal trial for attempting to steal the 2020 election until after this Novembers election. And the one GOP appointee who seemed to hedge the most, Chief Justice John Roberts, also seemed to think that Trump enjoys at least some immunity from criminal prosecution.
Much of the Courts Republican majority, moreover, seemed eager not simply to delay Trumps trial until after the election, but to give him extraordinarily broad immunity from criminal prosecution should he be elected once again. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, for example, argued that when a president exercises his official powers, he cannot be charged under any federal criminal statute at all, unless that statute contains explicit language saying that it applies to the president.
As Michael Dreeben, the lawyer arguing on behalf of Smiths prosecution team, told the Court, only two federal laws meet this standard. So Kavanaughs rule would amount to near complete immunity for anything a president did while exercising their executive authority.
Justice Samuel Alito, meanwhile, played his traditional role as the Courts most dyspeptic advocate for whatever position the Republican Party prefers. At one point, Alito even argued that permitting Trump to be prosecuted for attempting to overthrow the 2020 presidential election would lead us into a cycle that destabilizes ... our democracy, because future presidents who lose elections would mimic Trumps criminal behavior in order to remain in office and avoid being prosecuted by their successor.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1195 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Donald Trump had a fantastic day in the Supreme Court today (Original Post)
In It to Win It
Apr 25
OP
Turbineguy
(37,370 posts)1. Maybe.
It may just come down to American voters protecting themselves.
hlthe2b
(102,378 posts)2. Seems to be one of a large variety of opinions... I do agree on the likelihood of delay so in that
it would be a very good day for TSF, but the rest-- most of what I've read, the analyses, and what I heard myself --seem to afford some very different opinions.
Irish_Dem
(47,436 posts)3. The SC is paving the way for a GOP fascist dictatorship.
They are the judicial rubber stamp.
Shocking but not surprising.
They are so lazy they don't even bother coming up with semi-intelligent excuses.
MorbidButterflyTat
(1,855 posts)4. This is crap
Nice photo, too.
Guess we should all pack it in and give up.
Blue Owl
(50,507 posts)5. Failing upwards thanks to "journalism" like this
MorbidButterflyTat
(1,855 posts)6. I'm about on my last nerve
..with the non-stop gloom and doom.
Just not in the mood for it today.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)7. I don't think this is true. I thought there were more skeptical justices on the immunity question...th
then not.