General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump Lawyer Says Having Political Rival Killed Could Constitute 'Official' Presidential Act
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/supreme-court-trump-immunity-oral-arguments-1235010538/So what kind of crimes do the former presidents attorneys think should fall under the umbrella of executive immunity? Pretty much everything, apparently, including political assassinations.
When asked by Justice Sonya Sotomayor during arguments on Thursday if the president deciding that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military or he orders someone to assassinate him would constitute an official act subject to immunity, attorney D. John Sauer said it could.
In another hypothetical, Justice Elena Kagan asked if the president would be immune from prosecution if he sold nuclear secrets to a foreign adversary. Sauer affirmed that the sale was an official act the president would need to first be impeached and convicted before he could be prosecuted.
Sauer also claimed under questioning that a president could theoretically be immune from prosecution if he carried out or attempted to carry out a coup against the government.
CincyDem
(6,386 posts)Asking for a friend.
LiberalFighter
(51,094 posts)Maybe I could be appointed to handle that and reinstate Remo the Destroyer.
B.See
(1,292 posts)protest outside their homes.
Irish_Dem
(47,435 posts)Putin does it all the time and doesn't even hide it.
randr
(12,417 posts)sarisataka
(18,774 posts)Trueblue1968
(17,240 posts)I Hate Them All
Biophilic
(3,694 posts)What kind of a nation have we become that the idea of a president killing a political rival is considered ok to talk about in public. Not just in public, but in the halls of the Supreme Court. For gods sake!!! How is this even imagined let alone talked about!!
Bundbuster
(3,197 posts)This 2016 campaign statement was just a prelude to normailzing Shitler's dictatorship theory reality.
no_hypocrisy
(46,193 posts)of his/her successor (someone who beat him in the Election) and be immune from prosecution?
(BTW, having attended and graduated from law school, this sort of hypothetical would be barred.)
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)Bundbuster
(3,197 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)Bundbuster
(3,197 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)Bundbuster
(3,197 posts)You are a DU treasure.