The Wall Street Journal puts its bullshit and propaganda in the editorial section

The New York Times puts its bullshit and propaganda on the front page as NEWS

Recommended

they're putting their whole damn fist! And calling it fucking news!

Evidence?

It appears to be a general hypothetical statement.

Whitewater

Troopergate

Filegate

Travelgate

Al Gore 'inventing the internet'

Iraq having WMDs

Swift Boat lies

Benghazi

Hillary's emails

Clinton Cash

And not to mention ignoring the many crimes TSF carried out right under their very noses but that they somehow couldn'tever see. Repeatedly.

Maybe you don't know what credible evidence looks like, but the rest of us do.

They have a history of occasionally producing skewed reports. A simple one was the false claim that LSD broke chromosomes, their cited the opposite and the retraction was stuck deep on a quiet day. It still gets cited even though it's false.

Here is a selected list.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_New_York_Times_controversies

Here is the guy who basically wrote fiction.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jayson_Blair#:~:text=Jayson%20Thomas%20Blair%20(born%20March,and%20plagiarism%20in%20his%20stories.&text=Columbia%2C%20Maryland%2C%20U.S.

.

Lost all credibility with me a couple years ago. I don't think much of Susan Glasser either.

I immediately change the channel. Completely worthless.

Using Politico to allege the Times as politically biased?

everyone I know has cancelled their on line subscription to the NYT this past month............

Or they're putting their thumbs on the scale already, but for Trump?

#3: NYT Pitchbot account isn't exclusively a reaction to their Trump coverage - which is consistently negative and not "kid glove". It's a parody of how they "play it down the middle".

But don't let that stand in the way of today's 10th DU OP rant about the NYT.

I just did a search on the NYT for "Biden Age". Most articles that come up are Op-Eds, from French, Bruni, Blow, and guest columnists. Only French's was negative and that's little surprise.

All news reporting is clustered around the Hur Report release: Feb 8, 9, 10, and then on March 8 & 9 had articles about Trump attacking Biden's age. Probably legitimate to address his age then, since Hur made a BFD about it.

and tiviolized Trump's crime wave and Russian connections. That is putting his thumb on the scale.

And if it weren't for hyperbole, rags like the NYT would have nothing to say.

-- Mal

That is all

Because my wife likes the Sunday Magazine.

My wife and I have had a 7-day subscription since 1979. Still top of the line news reporting. Whether I like the story or not.

...horseshit rumor about Clinton spread around Little Rock by the same people who, years earlier, had been part of the white Citizens Council crowd, and other assorted grifters and opportunists.

What part of that amounted to a respected news organization being led by its own pretensions to serve as a vehicle for a smear campaign?

It was a phenomena hardly restricted to the NYT. Recall the New Republic's "Clinton suck-up watch".

Because he believees (as do too many others) that making "both sides" look, if not the same, at least equivalent, is being "fair."

He doesn't realize that kind of fairness is not his job. The job of a journalist is to report the truth.

That is what we need to eliminate in jouralism, not just him. He's just one of many.

I've seen a quote from a reporter alleging this but no reaction from the subject and no confirmation or denial from them.

Not a journalist.

The article on Sulzberger: