General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSusan G. Komen’s priceless gift
The starling intensity that we saw this week in response to Susan G. Komen for the Cures decision to pull its grants from Planned Parenthood an intensity that prompted the Komen foundation to reverse its decision today may be the best thing thats happened to the conversation about reproductive rights in this country for decades. It certainly should be.
Practically since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973, reproductive rights activists have been left to play stilted defense against ideological opponents who grabbed the language of morality, life, love and family as their own, always deploying it with reference to the fetus. The rhetoric around reproductive rights, which has more recently begun to creep into arguments over contraception, has become suffocating in its emotional self-righteousness, but too muscular, too ubiquitous to effectively combat.
But the overreach by the Komen foundation, while surely intended to strike yet another blow on the side of antiabortion activism, succeeded instead in waking a powerful constituency armed with precisely the language and emotional heft theyve been lacking for too long. <...>
For defenders of Planned Parenthood, and more broadly for reproductive rights activists, this moment of repositioning is a valuable one. Until now, it has proven very difficult for advocates to resuscitate their side with language anywhere near as powerful as that used by antiabortion forces. Instead they have relied too heavily on the fungible, limp, endlessly open-ended language of choice. (Even among pro-choice advocates, the I choose my choice! joke from Sex and the City has become a ubiquitous critique.) But what happened this week was powerful. It was mass. It was direct. It was emotional. And it restores women as the moral center of this conversation which is where they belong. Salon
malaise
(269,310 posts)Rec
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)when we wake up and speak out, the other side is always like "holy fuck Gee, willikers, where did ALL THESE PEOPLE come from???"
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I was furious.
This sounds like one RIGHTEOUS article!!!
I've always said, making it a choice issue is a big mistake. We should be emphasizing that safe abortion is a matter of LIFE or DEATH for women.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)1.2 Million People on the mall, and the Cable Newz spent the whole fucking day talking about Estee Lauder's death and chasing after elusive and drunk Nascar Bush voters.
My impression was this sort of pissy attitude from on high about "how dare these little people think they can decide what the news is today. We'll tell you what's important to you, not the other way around."
But despite pretending to ignore it, you can damn well bet people -important people- noticed that march.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)below the fold?
A "personal interest" story about a young evangelical couple, and how hard it is to be evangelical christian in this country that oppresses christians so heartlessly.
Fuh real.
Seriesally.
Democrat and Chronicle isn't some tiny backwater rag, either. It's the Rochester area paper. I wrote a LTE but D and C (how darkly ironic, that name) ignored me. Quel surprise.
so you traveled 3000 miles to be there?!! There's gotta be a great story there! That is OUTSTANDING!!!!! And I'm jealous.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Not much of a story, except we're all pretty serious about protecting Roe v. Wade. The march was just.... mind-blowingly huge. And given that this was smack right in the middle of the era of post 9-11 Bush, it was very inspiring to see all that political voice.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Great way to do it!
Like I said--- I'm jealous!!!!!!!!!
DCKit
(18,541 posts)They hate it when we get riled up.
Not female, just get it. Komen screwed up badly.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)Thanks, tishaLA, for posting this!
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)tishaLA
(14,176 posts)niyad
(113,961 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)For the first time in what feels like forever, passion and fury were being loudly, proudly given in a full-throated voice, on behalf of women women as moral actors; women as citizens with rights, health, bodies, freedoms; women as people with families and economic concerns.
It was a long article and so good, that I didn't want it to end!
YES!!!!! Finally finally FINALLY, mass support, respect that cannot be hidden beneath layers of partisan media or lurid fascination with women's sex-parts for the purpose of titillation/marketing or simpering concern for our "natural role" as mothers *coff choke*. REAL support for women as REAL people, with lives, individuality, diversity, and a massive admission that conservative ideology is out to HARM US.
Thanks to such massive action on the part of so many people, and to the power of the intertubes, this movement CANNOT be subjected to the censorship effect that relegates most "ladies' concerns" to women's magazines, amid the ads for mascara and yogurt that helps you crap .
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Making abortion illegal does not mean there will be no abortions. This bland, unexamined assumption is passed over again and again in anti-choice discussions. For those of "a certain age", who remember pre - Roe vs Wade. .What it means is lonely, terrifying, septic deaths of desperate young women who attempt to self-abort. It means back alley butchers, charging huge fees in filthy places. It means suicide for those poor girls who can see no way out of their despair..
I hope everyone who finds themselves locked in a contentious discussion with some forced-birther will remember.
great white snark
(2,646 posts)Thank you.