General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSomeone explain something to me about Ron Paul
On Rep. Paul's campaign website he claims to be an OB/GYN who delivered over 4000 babies and never found it necessary to use abortion to save the life of the mother.
Ectopic pregnancy (embryo lodging itself in a fallopian tube, where it won't fit) is a life-threatening condition that's treated by abortion. The American Association of Family Physicians reports the incidence of ectopic pregnancy is 20 per 1000 pregnancies. If Paul's practice was average, he should have seen about 80 of these.
Then add in another few for things like Mrs. Santorum had, and over his career he probably handled 100 cases of pregnancies that needed to be terminated to preserve the life and/or health of the mother. How, exactly, did he take care of these women?
Did he perform the procedure and call it something else?
Refer the patient to a doctor who would do his job?
Or did he attempt to pray away the problem until the mother, in pain and scared for her life, went to a competent OB/GYN?
If you're an OB/GYN you are going to have to perform an occasional abortion to save someone's life. If your conscience forbids you from doing this, you really need to specialize in something else.
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)I bet if someone could do a bit of looking at his records, they'd find more than a few interesting procedures. I wonder how many OBGYN's rolled their eyes at his statement?
damyank913
(787 posts)You know-like the racist rants that appeared in his newsletter.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)The body just bleeds it out.
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)have resolved naturally. HE'S.LYING.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)If left untreated, tubal pregnancies result in ruptured tubal pregnancies. This is a very serious event that requires medical intervention. The woman does not just "bleed out" the embryo-- her fallopian tube has ruptured and she WILL bleed to death w/out emergency surgery to stop the hemorrhaging and blood transfusions to replace the lost blood. In summary, one way or another, a tubal pregnancy WILL require medical intervention. Therefore, I am at a loss to understand where this "half don't require medical interventions" statement is coming from.
I know of no other outcome (to medically untreated tubal pregnancies). Which your statement is specifically refering to. If you have other info, I'd love to see it.
The only caveat would be if both you and the OP are speaking of all ectopic pregnancies... In very rare instances, the embryo implants itself in places other then the fallopian tube or the uterus, in which case it may be possible for the the woman to "just" bleed out. But this is much more rare and even then, my guess is that some medical intervention may also be required.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)but I may have been a little too hasty.
Upon further investigation, I found that the member I responded to was not entirely wrong here... well, according to wikipedia. Apparently some tubal pregnancies do resolve on their own. They somehow become 'unlodged' from the tube. I was previously unaware of that despite having done a lot of reading on the subject-- My sister almost died from a ruptured tubal pregnancy.
My bad. I could have deleted but will let the post stand.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)I didn't know anything about it until I looked it up. Granted, wikipedia may not be an authoritative source.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Actually, I think he's being fast and loose with the truth.
madokie
(51,076 posts)either way he's fucking lying his sorry ass off
Thats what I think and I'm sticking to it
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Not his problem.
treestar
(82,383 posts)What a moran.
Mosaic
(1,451 posts)He needs to become a Progressive. None of this I'm a Christian only for certain things, and a racist hypocrite for others.