Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stockholmer

(3,751 posts)
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 06:36 PM Feb 2012

Obama budget proposes to bill travelers $32 Billion in new security pat-down and other airline fees

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/13/us-usa-budget-transport-idUSTRE81C1BP20120213

(Reuters) - Airlines and their passengers would pay up to $32 billion in new air traffic and security fees over 10 years, and grants to big airports would fall sharply under White House budget proposals on Monday aimed at deficit reduction. The Obama administration wants major carriers, their passengers, business jets and airports to pick up more of the costs of air travel and airport improvements that for years have been borne by taxpayers.

New fees are sure to trigger strong opposition from airlines and other aviation groups who argue that the industry is already over-taxed and over-regulated. Ideas quietly floated and then discarded during congressional budget negotiations last summer reemerged in the fiscal 2013 transportation and homeland security portions of the White House budget sent to Congress that outlines $4 trillion in deficit reduction.

snip

The budget proposal would also permit the Homeland Security Department to raise the fee on its own after that through regulation. Congress has resisted previous efforts by the Bush and Obama administrations to raise security fees, which cover less than half of the cost annually of screening airline passengers and their bags for weapons and bombs.

But airlines worry that Congress may yield to the enormous pressure to cut federal spending. Airlines are also making money again on higher fares, which could make it more difficult to convince lawmakers to see things their way. The administration is also proposing a $100 departure fee for airlines, business jets and other aircraft to help cover the costs of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) air traffic control.

snip
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama budget proposes to bill travelers $32 Billion in new security pat-down and other airline fees (Original Post) stockholmer Feb 2012 OP
........ Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #1
Well, ProSense Feb 2012 #2
Great response. Thank you. n/t Avalux Feb 2012 #3
Oh! The OutrageŽ! emulatorloo Feb 2012 #5
This is the sentence that you should have made bold ... JoePhilly Feb 2012 #4

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
2. Well,
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 06:50 PM
Feb 2012
The Obama administration wants major carriers, their passengers, business jets and airports to pick up more of the costs of air travel and airport improvements that for years have been borne by taxpayers.

New fees are sure to trigger strong opposition from airlines and other aviation groups who argue that the industry is already over-taxed and over-regulated.

...the article is probably part of that strong opposition. The fees are on airlines.

There is a cap on passenger fees.

Airports have unsuccessfully pushed for congressional authority to raise more money through higher fees, which are capped at $4.50 per passenger, per flight.

This was also in last year's budget.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
4. This is the sentence that you should have made bold ...
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 06:58 PM
Feb 2012
The Obama administration wants major carriers, their passengers, business jets and airports to pick up more of the costs of air travel and airport improvements that for years have been borne by taxpayers.


Sounds to me like the costs are being shifted from tax payers, and BACK to the industry, business jets, and travelers.

And this is bad?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama budget proposes to ...