General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFBI seeks developers for app to track suspicious social media posts, sparking privacy concerns
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/16/fbi-seeks-developers-for-app-to-track-suspicious-social-media-posts-sparking/
The FBI is getting in on the law enforcement app game on the heels of a controversial data mining project by the Homeland Security Department.
Documents recently posted on line seek industry input to develop the equivalent of a web alert system.
I think what you are looking at is a Google news feed specifically targeted for law enforcement, focusing on their specific needs, Frank Ciluffo, who leads George Washington Universitys Homeland Security Policy Institute, told Fox News..We're on our mobile phones and we're on our various iPhones, BlackBerrys and the like that transmits data that locates individuals.
he 12-page document, called "FBI Social Media Application," provides a detailed picture of the bureaus specifications. The program must have the ability "to rapidly assemble critical open source information and intelligence ... to quickly vet, identify, and geo-locate breaking events, incidents and emerging threats."
a simple pattern
(608 posts)Software could help prevent Santorum
Want software to monitor Santorum
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)"you know, I think pot should be legal"
TERRORISM!
DCKit
(18,541 posts)Wasn't the umbrella agency, Homeland Security, formed to eliminate the duplication of effort and save taxpayer dollars?
Obviously it's not working, and should be disbanded.
jsmirman
(4,507 posts)it's not preventing speech, it's not a prior restraint, but there is an argument to be made that certain rights are being infringed upon as a result of exercising the right to speak freely... I suppose this is where people who focus on this stuff see "chilling effects" and "prior restraint" mixing.
The criminalization of not just free speech, but free speech concerning political discourse - which is supposed to be the heart of the first amendment - it's very disturbing.
Weren't we, at our founding, a country of dissenters?
"Suspicious" is certainly a horsecrap standard. If I'm making threats as to what it seems I may really have the ability to do, that's one thing - but if I'm speaking as a law-abiding citizen, in posts that make clear that I am a law abiding citizen, eh, I mean, I suppose that I suppose they've always kept these sort of files, but it's outrageous.
For example, I support the legalization of marijuana, but I won't smoke - as a future officer of the court, from the day I contemplated law school, I knew/decided that until it is legalized, it's something I can't have. But because I will openly say that the pot laws are bullshit, I get a special file or get tracked?