Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stockholmer

(3,751 posts)
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 07:29 PM Feb 2012

Proof that War Is Bad for the Economy

http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/proof-war-bad-economy

Preface: Many Americans – including influential economists http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123008280526532053.html and talking heads http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/29/AR2010102907404.html - assume that war is good for the economy. Many congressmen assume that cutting pork-barrel military spending would hurt their constituents’ jobs. As demonstrated below, it isn’t true.

Nobel-prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz says that war is bad for the economy http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/nobel-prize-winning-economist-war-is-widely-thought-to-be-linked-to-economic-good-times-nonsense.html : Stiglitz wrote in 2003: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/jan/22/iraq.economy

War is widely thought to be linked to economic good times. The second world war is often said to have brought the world out of depression, and war has since enhanced its reputation as a spur to economic growth. Some even suggest that capitalism needs wars, that without them, recession would always lurk on the horizon. Today, we know that this is nonsense. The 1990s boom showed that peace is economically far better than war. The Gulf war of 1991 demonstrated that wars can actually be bad for an economy.

Stiglitz has also said that this decade’s Iraq war has been very bad for the economy. See this http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,409710,00.html , this http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article3419840.ece and this

.

snip

And economist Dean Baker notes http://www.cepr.net/content/view/1157/77/ : It is often believed that wars and military spending increases are good for the economy. In fact, most economic models show that military spending diverts resources from productive uses, such as consumption and investment, and ultimately slows economic growth and reduces employment.

War Spending Diverts Stimulus Away from the Real Civilian Economy

The New Republic noted http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-stash/military-spending-fiscal-stimulus in 2009:

snip

--------------

much more at top link
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Proof that War Is Bad for the Economy (Original Post) stockholmer Feb 2012 OP
If only our leaders had listened to Eisenhower. libinnyandia Feb 2012 #1
As long as you are talking about "our" economy, yes. If you are talking about the rustydog Feb 2012 #2
WOW! An impressive amount cbrer Feb 2012 #3
yah, read up on the Romans sometime n/t JNathanK Feb 2012 #4

rustydog

(9,186 posts)
2. As long as you are talking about "our" economy, yes. If you are talking about the
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 08:41 PM
Feb 2012

military contrator's (mercenary armies) economy, the oil producing corporation's economy, bankster's economy, Willard's economy, it is doing just fine and will continue to do so. Our economy sucks.

 

cbrer

(1,831 posts)
3. WOW! An impressive amount
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 04:39 AM
Feb 2012

Of data. Unfortunately, it leaves out the part about war enrichening people who buy politicians. And employ lots of people who then (typically) vote Republican.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Proof that War Is Bad for...