General Discussion

kpete

(72,057 posts) Tue Feb 28, 2012, 03:08 PM Feb 2012

WHICH MAKES MORE SENSE? (Hint: It’s not for the money.)

If you’re capable of critical thought, your first response when you hear about green nonprofits and climate scientists engaging in a vast worldwide conspiracy is probably not “oh no!” but “why in the world would they bother?” (Hint: It’s not for the money.) Via Brooke Jarvis on Twitter, here’s a graphical representation of why the opposite hypothesis kinda makes a lot more sense.

http://yfrog.com/oex97kej

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WHICH MAKES MORE SENSE? (Hint: It’s not for the money.) (Original Post) kpete Feb 2012 OP

But this graphic fails to show what the blathering idiots really believe. Waltons_Mtn Feb 2012 #1

Waltons_Mtn

(345 posts)

1. But this graphic fails to show what the blathering idiots really believe.

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Tue Feb 28, 2012, 03:51 PM

Feb 2012

They believe that one or two of the exteme, far left, even more rich than the oil barons liberals is spending ten time the obsene oil profits to bribe the 90% of scientist to create the hoax so that they get even more rich when the economy tanks and practically enslave people with there clean energy products, which you know aren't really any cleaner than oil.

I work with a ton of them. Honestly, this is what they believe.

Reply to this discussion