Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 10:40 AM Feb 2014

'Damning' TransCanada pipeline rupture report uncovered

http://i.cbc.ca/1.2522386.1391521804!/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_620/image.jpg
Source: CBC News

A CBC News investigation has unearthed a critical report that the federal regulator effectively buried for several years about a rupture on a trouble-prone TransCanada natural gas pipeline.

On July 20, 2009, the Peace River Mainline in northern Alberta exploded, sending 50-metre-tall flames into the air and razing a two-hectare wooded area.

Few people ever learned of the rupture — one of the largest in the past decade — other than the Dene Tha’ First Nation, whose traditional territory it happened on.

... Environmental policy expert Nathan Lemphers questions whether TransCanada’s contentious Keystone XL proposal, under environmental review in the U.S. at the same time, had a bearing on the regulator not publishing the Peace River Mainline draft report.

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/pipeline-rupture-report-raises-questions-about-transcanada-inspections-1.2521959
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Damning' TransCanada pipeline rupture report uncovered (Original Post) Newsjock Feb 2014 OP
the whole pipeline-tar sands cluster*ck is sick from start to finish Berlum Feb 2014 #1
This wasn't tar sands laundry_queen Feb 2014 #3
Pipelines always break, all of them. another_liberal Feb 2014 #4
It isn't necessary that they do so, though. JoeyT Feb 2014 #5
If pigs could fly . . . maybe. another_liberal Feb 2014 #6
I have lived in that area. laundry_queen Feb 2014 #2
you hit the nail on the head with onethatcares Feb 2014 #7

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
3. This wasn't tar sands
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 11:42 AM
Feb 2014

this was the opposite side of the province...north west, the tar sands are in the north east. This was a natural gas pipeline - like the thousands of miles of pipelines that already criss cross the US and Canada. This shows that no new pipelines should be built - be it natural gas or bitumen - until there are strict regulations regarding pipeline maintenance - real regulations with teeth and strict enforcement. It also demonstrates the danger that is lurking everywhere currently - there are pipelines in populated areas - had this happened there it would've been a catastrophe. Pipelines need tons of maintenance and companies are dropping the ball on pipelines that already exist - what makes us think they will do better with the newer pipelines?

Of course the real solution would be to stop using fossil fuels...but that won't happen until we have no other choice because...well, that's humans for you.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
4. Pipelines always break, all of them.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:29 PM
Feb 2014

That is an inescapable fact the industry's apologists desperately try to cover up. If the Keystone is built, sooner or later it will break as well. That will be a disaster for anyone who lives anywhere near the break.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
5. It isn't necessary that they do so, though.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 04:01 PM
Feb 2014

Regulated properly and with those regulations enforced strictly enough, you could virtually guarantee safety until the end of time. Will we regulate them properly or bother to enforce what little regulation we pass? Fuck no.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
6. If pigs could fly . . . maybe.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 04:29 PM
Feb 2014

What you suggest is like asking the Koch brothers to give a damn about the people they're poisoning. In fact, it's exactly like that.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
2. I have lived in that area.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 11:36 AM
Feb 2014

There's a big problem with lack of qualified people running those pipelines. If you can read and write and show up on time, you got a job. My ex did a lot of pipeline maintenance in that area - lots of companies skimp on inspections, maintenance etc. He often had a hard time convincing the people who ran the pipelines that they needed basic things like corrosion inhibitor, because that shit costs money. This is the problem with pipelines - in theory, they can be very safe. Realistically, with companies always trying to make that extra 0.000000001% profit margin you will have assholes cutting things like pipeline safety and maintenance.

onethatcares

(16,206 posts)
7. you hit the nail on the head with
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 05:03 PM
Feb 2014

"that shit costs money".

And no one in the upper echelons wants to spend money on some gauddammmm safety or maintenance item.

hell,it could screw up their bonus or sumpin.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Damning' TransCanada pip...