General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Wyden is slowing Obama on trade
By Vicki Needham
The next chairman of the Senate Finance Committee is making it plain to President Obama that he will not rush forward with fast-track legislation that would spur on the White Houses trade agenda.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has no plans to take up the fast-track bill written by outgoing Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.)...Instead, he says he will hear out other senators on trade, a policy area he says has changed tremendously since the last time a fast-track bill was approved, in 2002.
<...>
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), a member of the panel who has been critical of free-trade policies, said his view is that Wyden will ditch the bill Baucus wrote with Sen. Orrin Hatch (Utah), the top Republican on Finance, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.).
Brown expects Wyden to start from scratch.
Were not going to pass a 2002 fast-track and thats pretty much what the Hatch-Camp-Baucus bill was, he told The Hill. It was dressing up the pig to make it look a little better ...It has to be fundamentally different, Brown said of a future bill.
- more-
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/trade/197610-sen-wyden-says-not-so-fast-on-trade
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)It's bizarre that we need to contain a Democratic president for the next three years... but here we are.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"It's bizarre that we need to contain a Democratic president for the next three years... but here we are."
Makes you wonder why Obama didn't just leave Baucus in place.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)are his right-wing aspirations of free trade and cutting the social safety net. We need to make sure it doesn't happen.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Realistically, the only things he can achive in 3 years are his right-wing aspirations of free trade and cutting the social safety net."
Friggin failure.
quakerboy
(13,923 posts)Oh what a joy it is to have mostly decent senators, and no more Smith.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)We need a few more states to be similarly blessed.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"We need a few more states to be similarly blessed."
...NJ got lucky. Our newest Senator might not turn out to be a tool: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024464953#post4
Senator Booker (D-NJ) Delivers Maiden Speech, Begins Colloquy to Urge Extension Passage
Feb 4, 2014
Video of Senator Warren's Remarks Available Here
Washington, DC As part of a colloquy on the floor of the Senate led by Senator Cory Bookers (D-NJ) maiden speech on Monday evening, United States Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) called on Congress to pass an extension of unemployment insurance. She advocated for the 60,000 people in Massachusetts and 1.6 million Americans across the country who lost their unemployment insurance benefits when Republicans filibustered multiple attempts to pass an extension and cut off many families only means of paying the rent or putting food on the table.
Unemployment insurance is a critical lifeline for people who are trying their hardest and need a little help a recognition that Wall Street and Washington caused the financial crisis, but Main Street is still paying the price, said Senator Warren. And theres the rub: Republicans line up to protect billions in tax breaks and subsidies for big corporations with armies of lobbyists, but they cant find a way to help struggling families trying get back on their feet.
The senator read a letter she received from Terry, a 41 year old resident of Gardner who was suddenly let go from her job last year, leaving her unemployed for the first time since she started working at age 15. I know Im one of 1.3 million faces, but Im a face from near your home, she wrote. Im a face that never thought Id be in this situation. Im a face that needs the help of my governments services that I have paid into for many, many years. Im a face that has done everything Im supposed to but I feel like Ive fallen aside and no one sees me. Im not an abuser of the system. Im someone who really needs my government to be there for me now. Please see me.
Senator Warren also addressed the misguided comments of some Republicans that unemployment insurance is bad for struggling families and that unemployment insurance keeps individuals from finding work. This is an insult to hard working people across this country people who are doing their best and cant find a job. This is an insult to people like Terry, she said.
Senator Warren held a roundtable in Worcester last month to discuss the expiration of unemployment insurance and her continued fight to help families struggling to find work.
http://www.warren.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=330
madinmaryland
(64,934 posts)that is not favorable to this country? We've seen what has happened with NAFTA.
pampango
(24,692 posts)of NAFTA, a few other FTA's and WTO trade policies with the countries involved. If we could have done that in a way that protected labor rights and the environment that would have been the "renegotiation" that many of us have been looking for for 20 years.
Now we are left with the same NAFTA and other trade rules that we have had for the past 20 years and more. It is a testament to how bad the TPP is and what a missed opportunity it was that most of us liberals think that keeping NAFTA and our other trade agreements as-is is the better option. We still want to change them, but a new opportunity to do so is probably not on the near-term horizon.
So there is no problem with Sen. Wyden slowing it down, just the missed opportunity that the whole thing represents.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)And Ron is our more conservative Senator, relatively speaking of course. We have Jeff Merkley as well.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Senator Merkley was responsible for the Volcker rule.
December 10, 2013
Washington, DC Senators Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Carl Levin (D-MI) released the following joint statement after approval by the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Commission (FDIC) of the final Volcker Rule, a firewall between traditional banking and hedge fund style gambling. Merkley and Levin led the fight to pass the provision during the debate over the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act in 2010.
We fought for the Merkley-Levin provision of the Dodd-Frank Act in order to put a strong firewall between banks and hedge fund-style high-risk trading. Today is a big step toward that goal. We are still reviewing the details of the final rule, but early indications suggest that persistence and common sense can prevail in the face of even the fiercest special interest lobbying campaigns: hedging looks tougher, market-making looks simpler, trader compensation remains appropriately structured, and CEOs are required to set the tone at the top. No regulation is ever perfect, and we will carefully monitor implementation and hold regulators and firms accountable. If problems emerge for whatever reason we will quickly press regulators to address them. Overall, though, the final rule looks improved over the proposal from two years earlier.
The Merkley-Levin Amendment was intended to change the culture and practices at our nations largest financial firms, to prevent Wall Street and the big banks from making swing-for-the-fences bets that put depositors and taxpayers at risk. The regulators have taken a serious step forward in mandating critical changes.
Hedge-fund style proprietary trading at our nations largest financial firms was a high-risk, conflict-ridden activity that played a central role in the 2008 financial crisis. Banks should be in the business of serving customers including taking deposits from and making loans to ordinary families and businesses. Speculative investing should be left to hedge funds, private equity funds, and other private investors that, if they get in trouble, wont imperil the lending so critical to our economic growth.
The Volcker Rule firewall, as embodied in the Merkley-Levin Amendment to Dodd-Frank:
- Bars our lending banks and their affiliates and subsidiaries from engaging in the speculative, conflict-ridden activities of making bets on the stock, bond, derivatives, and other markets and limits those activities at systemically important nonbank financial institutions;
- Allows for customer-oriented services, such as underwriting and market-making to facilitate capital formation for clients, risk-mitigating hedging activities to permit safe and sound operations, and fund management services for customers.
Enforcement and public accountability for it will be critical. The provision is implemented by the relevant federal regulator, including the Federal Reserve Board, the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the FDIC, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).