Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 09:10 AM Feb 2014

Asphyxiating Education

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/02/14-1



“The standards are designed to be robust and relevant to the real world, reflecting the knowledge and skills that our young people need for success in college and careers. With American students fully prepared for the future, our communities will be best positioned to compete successfully in the global economy.”


This is how we talk about learning, growth and the human future?

Things are getting worse in the American classroom, not better. The experts and the special interests purporting to fix the educational system are continuing, instead, to asphyxiate it.

The grandiose quote, above, in which “our young people” show up as abstractions needing to be prepped for some simplistic, highly competitive imaginary future (fully understood by the experts), is part of the mission statement of the Common Core State Standards Initiative, the Obama administration’s showcase education reform initiative.

Just like the disastrous No Child Left Behind Act of the Bush era, in whose wake it follows, it’s all about testing and uniform standards and the “rigorous” evaluation of schools and teachers; and it’s clueless about the nature of childhood development, not to mention reality. Its primary mission, as with NCLB, is to pull education out of the hands and hearts of teachers and turn its administration over to politicians and their corporate sponsors. It both defunds and belittles the learning process.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
1. K and R. But this guy gets an " I " ( that's "Ineffective"; Obamaspeak for "F"/Failure).....
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 09:26 AM
Feb 2014

...'cause he doesn't indent his paragraphs.

Such progress we've made.

jopacaco

(133 posts)
8. So we sacrifice a generation of students for an experiment
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 11:15 AM
Feb 2014

As someone who has been in the classroom for more than 30 years, it is not working. Proven instruction is being thrown out because it does not translate well to the test. Social Studies does not get tested so it is given less and less emphasis and time. So we will have students who don't know history and will believe the rewritings of the media and politicians.
Teachers are discouraged and teaching content that they feel is not suited to their students but have no choice because everyone must make measurable gains on the test. Thanks to this administration, jobs are now tied to student test scores. Hungry, poor students in abusive, drug addicted households must make the appropriate gains or it is the teacher's fault and there is no money to offer any additional support to these kids. I spend a lot of my own money buying essentials for my classroom.
I used to tell students what a great profession teaching was, now I tell students to find another career.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
11. No, we really don't want to give this a chance.
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 04:02 PM
Feb 2014

We've gone way beyond teaching to the test. The system has finally arrived where I figured it was headed as early as 2000. With days lost to weather this winter and the inflexibility of standardized testing schedules, I am spending more time administering tests than I am preparing students to take them. The result will be lower pass rates, more political interference, more teacher scapegoating, and more evidence that public schools are failing and need more of the same reforms that have caused them to need reform. The word that comes to mind is Kafkaesque.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
3. I think attitude is caused by our government being infected by business ideas.
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 10:19 AM
Feb 2014

I have always thought one of the biggest red flags about the qualification of a candidate is whether or not they ever earned an MBA. In spite of the assurances of those who wish to control government, business is nothing like government. It might be the antithesis of government; at least democratic government.
Business is concerned with extracting the most while expending the least (buy low, sell high). They are focused on mainly short term goals. There is a built in disposition to serve a master; be that master stockholders, (due to stock options frequently the company executives making the decisions) or an owner.
Democratic government shouldn't be extracting anything, but building a framework which allows the greatest amount of satisfaction for the greatest amount of people. While maintaining the best level of equality. Governmental goals should be hundreds of years long; or at least decades. There should be no masters, just participants, each worth the same amount.

We do not have that. We, once, were on the path to that.

Having suffered for many years under the inept hand of Corporate America, I recognize this administration's obsession with standardized testing as the product of Corporate obsession with benchmarks. The insane idea that a cookie cutter check point can be crammed onto every situation and produce reliable results. It doesn't work that well in the far more regulated and mature world of the workplace. So, expecting it to work in the exuberant dynamic world of a school is insane. But, it will produce information which can be interpreted in any number of ways. Remember, figures don't lie, but liars can figure.

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
5. Your last paragraph is bookmark-able:
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 10:40 AM
Feb 2014

>>>Having suffered for many years under the inept hand of Corporate America, I recognize this administration's obsession with standardized testing as the product of Corporate obsession with benchmarks. The insane idea that a cookie cutter check point can be crammed onto every situation and produce reliable results. It doesn't work that well in the far more regulated and mature world of the workplace. So, expecting it to work in the exuberant dynamic world of a school is insane. But, it will produce information which can be interpreted in any number of ways. Remember, figures don't lie, but liars can figure.>>>>

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
4. You don't really know something, till you understand it.
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 10:34 AM
Feb 2014

Our schools "Teach to the Test" curriculum, does not have time to impart understanding. The curriculum object is to teach the students enough of the answers to the test, so the schools get enough money to continue in the business of teaching to the test.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
7. There is ample documentation to support a massive lawsuit across states against the federal policies
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 11:05 AM
Feb 2014

imho...these policies negate the law which stipulates each child be given a free and appropriate
education.

Nothing would please me more than to see a challenge of that magnitude.

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
10. Let teachers TEACH.
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 02:25 PM
Feb 2014

They didn't sign up for, and were not expected to be, anything else - and they're the best, because they WANT to!

 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
12. "Compete in the global economy" = compete for jobs doled out by multinational corporations financed
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 04:31 PM
Feb 2014

& owned by multinational elites.

IOW, compete against workers all over the world for jobs.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Asphyxiating Education