Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 10:45 AM Feb 2014

Is Latest U.S. Drop in Press Freedom Rankings Due to Obama’s Attacks on Whistleblowers/Journalists?

The United States has long prided itself on having a supportive atmosphere for the media to operate and uncover the news. But an international group of journalists say the U.S. reputation for press freedom has plummeted this year, leaving the country behind others not known for promoting the fourth estate.

According to the World Press Freedom Index, the U.S. now ranks 46th in the world. Last year, it ranked 33rd.

Today, countries like Ghana, Poland, and El Salvador rank higher for press freedom than the U.S.

Reporters Without Borders, which produces the annual rankings, says the decline in U.S. position is due to the Barack Obama administration crackdown on whistleblowers who have leaked classified information to journalists.

The administration, in fact, has gone after more whistleblowers through criminal prosecution than any other presidential administration in history.

http://www.allgov.com/news/us-and-the-world/is-latest-us-drop-in-press-freedom-rankings-due-to-obamas-attacks-on-whistleblowers-and-journalists-for-their-sources-140214?news=852436&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is Latest U.S. Drop in Press Freedom Rankings Due to Obama’s Attacks on Whistleblowers/Journalists? (Original Post) The Straight Story Feb 2014 OP
The US has the best press freedom in the world treestar Feb 2014 #1
more reading required.. G_j Feb 2014 #3
Find one case that allows punishment for publication of anything treestar Feb 2014 #8
Sounds a lot like the arguments saying we have the best healthcare in the world. clffrdjk Feb 2014 #4
We don't have the best healthcare in the world treestar Feb 2014 #9
Journalists are an endangered species as this country descends into a national security state. L0oniX Feb 2014 #2
Obama has arrested what 100, 200+ Journalists by now I guess? JoePhilly Feb 2014 #5
But don't you know, El Salvador has a freer press! treestar Feb 2014 #10
Ouch! JoePhilly Feb 2014 #11
No. TheMathieu Feb 2014 #6
Well, we could blame Bush or Clinton. Autumn Feb 2014 #7

treestar

(82,383 posts)
1. The US has the best press freedom in the world
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 10:48 AM
Feb 2014

With the First Amendment, there is a guarantee. As has been shown over and over, the actual journalists are never punished, only the leaker. What a ridiculous ranking system. Do the other countries allegedly ahead of us have a First Amendment or a Whistleblower Protection law?

Anyone in the US can publish anything saying anything. There are no laws against publishing anything whatsoever and never will be.



G_j

(40,372 posts)
3. more reading required..
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 10:52 AM
Feb 2014
http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2014/feb/12/journalist-safety-press-freedom

The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) is carrying eight essays on its website based around the theme of "attacks on the press in 2013."

One, by San Francisco lawyer and university tutor Geoffrey King, deals with the threats to freedom posed by the National Security Agency.

It is long, 4,500 words long, so a précis doesn't really work. But it merits reading so set aside 20 minutes to absorb it. Among the people who should definitely read are those who think the wholesale collection of metadata is an innocent and unthreatening activity.

See also Maya Taal on the threats to journalists by the supranational sphere of cyberspace and Joel Simon on the implications of the US-China dispute over control of the internet.

Another piece that shouldn't be missed is on impunity by Elisabeth Witchel, "When journalists are killed, witnesses may be next". One factual paragraph stands out:

"In the last 10 years, 348 journalists have been murdered for their work worldwide. In only a handful of cases- one in 10 - have any perpetrators been brought to trial and sentenced."

Witchel shows how dangerous it is becoming for the witnesses to such murders. They are being killed in turn to prevent them giving testimony.

Michael Casey, in "Without stronger transparency, more financial crises loom", argues that the press needs to overcome secrecy in a market economy because of the threat to everyone's well-being posed by banks and financial institutions.

The other three articles are about censorship; the role of journalists as the voices of the poor and powerless; and the risks journalists must take in certain countries in order to report rape and sexual violence.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
8. Find one case that allows punishment for publication of anything
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 11:01 AM
Feb 2014

You can't. Even the attempt is immediately crushed by the First Amendment.

Reading opinions of the agenda'd is not education. No one is "murdered" in the US for publishing anything.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
10. But don't you know, El Salvador has a freer press!
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 11:04 AM
Feb 2014


http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=368504&CategoryId=23558

El Salvador’s High Court Deals Blow to Press Freedom

SAN SALVADOR – El Salvador’s Supreme Court ruled that the media and television station owners, editors and managers may be brought to trial for slander, injury or defamation in a decision interpreted as a blow against press freedom.

The high court’s Constitutional Chamber issued a 4-1 decision on Friday regarding the “unconstitutionality” of the third clause within Article 191 of the Criminal Code, which guarantees protection against criminal rulings against the press, Supreme Court spokesman Mario Larin said.

In reaction to the ruling, the country’s main dailies, including El Diario de Hoy, La Prensa Grafica and El Mundo, agreed that the decision constitutes a “blow to freedom of expression.”

“The ruling of four justices will foment fear and intolerance,” warned El Diario de Hoy, while El Mundo wrote that “it removes the protection from owners, managers, editors and people in charge” of media outlets.

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
7. Well, we could blame Bush or Clinton.
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 10:58 AM
Feb 2014

But neither of them are sitting behind the big desk in the White House at this time.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Latest U.S. Drop in Pr...