General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBridge-Ghazi Experts: Help, Please. So Christie Called *Cuomo* to Complain that the NYS Appointee...
... on the Port Authority ( Patrick Foye) was interfering with Bridgeghazi?
If I have that right ( And perhaps I do not, so correct me if that's the case.), why would Christie feel (apparently) that Cuomo would be sympathetic to Christie's dilemma?
And exactly what did they talk about? Is there a transcript? Is there a tape? If Cuomo gave sound and legit ( as in "legal", as in "not illegal" advice, what was it, exactly?
I find this aspect rather curious. The story below ends with the explanation that conversation between the two governors was "private."
Oh?
>>>New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie called his counterpart in New York to complain about a Port Authority of New York and New Jersey appointee's handling of the flap over lane closures at the George Washington Bridge, according to a report.
Citing a source familiar with the call, the Wall Street Journal said Christie called New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo to tell him that PA Executive Director Patrick Foye was pushing too hard to uncover the truth behind the lane closings, which have been the subject of hearings by the Assembly Transportation Committee. Foye was appointed by Cuomo.
Cuomo and Christie share authority over the massive bi-state agency.
The Port Authority's ranking member from New Jersey, Deputy Executive Director Bill Baroni told the committee members that the study had been ordered by Port Authority employee David Wildstein. Wildstein resigned his position last week, effective January 1. The study was done in order to gauge the impact of diverting lanes currently restricted for local use by Fort Lee residents, Baroni told the committee.
But earlier this week, Foye said he had no prior knowledge of the study and shut it down when he realized the extent of the traffic backup in Fort Lee. Other PA employees said Wildstein ordered the lane closures but advised them not to tell anyone it was happening.>>>>>>>
http://www.examiner.com/article/could-private-call-from-christie-to-n-y-governor-cuomo-blow-lid-off-bridge-gate
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)... I believe this was very early on and Christie was trying to stop any investigation from happening.
If memory serves, this was all done on private phone lines so there was no recording, transcript etc..
I could easily be wrong on both counts.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)That doesn't mean one or both of them didn't tape it of course.
But... why all the secrecy? Why doesn't someone just ask Cuomo what the call was about?
Or Christie.... if he hasn't been asked already.
okaawhatever
(9,478 posts)being said and done. They would call Cuomo in to testify, take statements, etc. Believe me, they would use all of their energy to make the story about Cuomo.
The point is not why won't Cuomo just answer the questions, but rather is there anything to learn or gain from it. If Christie didn't say anything illegal, and I'd guess the call was just "I'm innocent, stop picking on me, I'll make this look like it's the Democratic party bullying me" because if it was something more why didn't Cuomo do anything to his appointee? If the appointee backed off or was fired shortly after the call there might be some "there, there" but the evidence seems to back up Cuomo saying it was just Christie calling to ask for advice.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)>>>but the evidence seems to back up Cuomo saying it was just Christie calling to ask for advice.>>>>
I can't find that anywhere.
okaawhatever
(9,478 posts)Did the appointee stop looking into the scandal? Since nothing changed after the phone call, I'm not concerned with happened during it. The investigations will be thorough and if Cuomo did anything wrong I feel confident we'll find out. Too many eyes on this.
I've read many articles about this and followed it closely. I can't remember which ones specifically dealt with Cuomo describing the conversation.
Response to Smarmie Doofus (Original post)
rocktivity This message was self-deleted by its author.
rocktivity
(44,583 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 17, 2014, 08:27 PM - Edit history (1)
It proves that at the very least, he knew that there was no traffic study, and that he knew it a month sooner than he claims he did. And if this story is true, Cuomo has to explain what he did -- or didn't do -- in response, or his White House ambitions will sleep with the fishes, too.
P.S. Have you visited the DU Christie Crime Digest?
rocktivity
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)I'd like to know what was said.
Thanks for the linkage.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Should we be interested in what was said?