Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSetting the stage for a net-neutrality fight
Reposting.
Setting the stage for a net-neutrality fight
By Steve Benen
During a Google+ hangout last week, a voter in Arizona asked President Obama if he supports net neutrality. Obama said the policy is something that Ive cared deeply about ever since I ran for office and he continues to be a strong supporter of net neutrality.
As for the recent federal appeals court ruling against the policy, the president added that FCC Chairman Ted Wheeler, who also supports net neutrality, and his team are looking at all the options at their disposal potential appeals, potential rule making, a variety of tools that they may have in order to continue to vindicate the notion of a free and open Internet....Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), a long-time opponent of net neutrality and the co-chair of the Congressional Internet Caucus, spoke at the annual State of the Net policy conference and called for fewer consumer safeguards.
It would seem from his comments that Thune may not fully understand what net neutrality is...the general thrust of the policy is about making online content equally accessible to users, regardless of service providers...imagine an online landscape in which your service provider had a package of preferred websites customers could access those sites quickly and easily, and they would function as theyre supposed to. But the ISP also had websites with unfavorable status when customers tried to access sites the service provider doesnt like for whatever reason, maybe the sites would load slowly. Maybe consumers would have to pay more to access them. Maybe both.... consumer advocates think thats unfair service providers shouldnt be in a position, the argument goes, to make website access easier or harder based on the ISPs business decisions. The point of net neutrality is to create a level playing field, prohibiting service providers from playing favorites.
Thats the policy the Obama administration adopted, and its the same policy the D.C. Circuit struck down last month, leaving officials scrambling for an alternative.
- more -
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/setting-the-stage-net-neutrality-fight
By Steve Benen
During a Google+ hangout last week, a voter in Arizona asked President Obama if he supports net neutrality. Obama said the policy is something that Ive cared deeply about ever since I ran for office and he continues to be a strong supporter of net neutrality.
As for the recent federal appeals court ruling against the policy, the president added that FCC Chairman Ted Wheeler, who also supports net neutrality, and his team are looking at all the options at their disposal potential appeals, potential rule making, a variety of tools that they may have in order to continue to vindicate the notion of a free and open Internet....Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), a long-time opponent of net neutrality and the co-chair of the Congressional Internet Caucus, spoke at the annual State of the Net policy conference and called for fewer consumer safeguards.
I wish more government officials shared my optimism about how successful the Internet is about facilitating individual economic empowerment, he told the conference, which was hosted by the nonprofit Internet Education Foundation.
There are exceptions of course, but far too often, when you hear someone say, We need regulations to protect the Internet, what theyre actually saying is they dont really trust the entrepreneurs and Internet technologists to create the economic growth and to increase public welfare. < >
The remarks from GOP lawmakers seemed to be a direct challenge to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler, who spoke at the event earlier in the morning. Wheeler made the case for government action to ensure equal treatment of content online as well as oversight of the ways that networks connect to each other on the Internet, known as peering.
It would seem from his comments that Thune may not fully understand what net neutrality is...the general thrust of the policy is about making online content equally accessible to users, regardless of service providers...imagine an online landscape in which your service provider had a package of preferred websites customers could access those sites quickly and easily, and they would function as theyre supposed to. But the ISP also had websites with unfavorable status when customers tried to access sites the service provider doesnt like for whatever reason, maybe the sites would load slowly. Maybe consumers would have to pay more to access them. Maybe both.... consumer advocates think thats unfair service providers shouldnt be in a position, the argument goes, to make website access easier or harder based on the ISPs business decisions. The point of net neutrality is to create a level playing field, prohibiting service providers from playing favorites.
Thats the policy the Obama administration adopted, and its the same policy the D.C. Circuit struck down last month, leaving officials scrambling for an alternative.
- more -
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/setting-the-stage-net-neutrality-fight
FCC chair exploring net neutrality enforcement options
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024417388
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 350 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post