Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 09:11 AM Apr 2015

Supreme Court’s Big Gay Pandora’s Box - By Michael Tomasky

The idea that we should make gay marriage the law of the land and yet refuse to force businesses to follow that law is unjust and absurd.

Everybody’s up in arms about Mike Pence, Mike Pence, Mike Pence. My arms are up too. In fact I have anti-Pence cred going way back, to his chairmanship while in the House of the Republican Study Group, which played a key role in dragging the whole House GOP caucus hard to starboard. Indeed he was a protean figure in the lower chamber, a man ahead of his time, in whose breast dwelt deeply reactionary tendencies driven both by fiscal malevolence and alleged Biblical prophecy. There weren’t nearly as many of those in his day, so he was worth noticing, and to longtime Pence students, this law he’s signed is as unsurprising as a thing can be.

But I suggest to you, friends and comrades, that we also concern ourselves with the Supreme Court here. The High Court started all this, with the Hobby Lobby decision, and it’s the court that is steering us into some potentially dark and dangerous waters here.

Consider this. As we all know, the court is set to release its decision on same-sex marriage, probably at the end of its term in June. Virtually everyone thinks that a five-justice majority is going to uphold a federal right for same-sexers to marry. That would consist, of course, of the court’s four liberals plus Anthony Kennedy.

Okay, that’s great, if it happens. But remember: This is the same court that just said that it is okay, on the basis of religious conscience, for businesses to discriminate against gay people and refuse to photograph or cater or be-flower their wedding ceremonies. (The court actually ruled that privately held corporations could discriminate, but I guess since corporations are people, the various red-state legislatures have extended the principle to smaller enterprises.) So if the court rules for same-sex marriage this June, it will have said, in the space of exactly one year: Same-sex marriage is the law of the land, but refusing to honor same-sex marriage is the law of the land, too!

more
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/01/supreme-court-s-big-gay-pandora-s-box.html
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court’s Big Gay Pandora’s Box - By Michael Tomasky (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2015 OP
Being a member of the LGBT community, marym625 Apr 2015 #1
This from article >>> RKP5637 Apr 2015 #2
Yes. This is the crucial point. Presidents nominate Supreme Court justices. yardwork Apr 2015 #3
Yep, far too many people IMO still think they are voting for old time republicans and RKP5637 Apr 2015 #4

marym625

(17,997 posts)
1. Being a member of the LGBT community,
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 09:26 AM
Apr 2015

I am obviously incensed about the RFRA in Indiana. But we can't forget about the implications this has on women's rights. Thank you for bringing it up.

On a side note, I hope that SCOTUS does make marriage equality the law of the land and does it on June 25th. That would be wonderful!

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
2. This from article >>>
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 09:27 AM
Apr 2015
... and here is where I remind you that the next president will probably nominate three and maybe even four Supreme Court justices and yes you love Elizabeth Warren and yes you’re down on Hillary but Warren isn’t running and Clinton is and no she’s not perfect but please just deal with it and if nothing else think about a liberal majority on the Supreme Court for the next 30 years and counting all right?—we might get back to that understanding some jurisprudentially provident day.

yardwork

(61,719 posts)
3. Yes. This is the crucial point. Presidents nominate Supreme Court justices.
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 09:43 AM
Apr 2015

I had no idea that Mike Pence was so extreme. Learning about his background is very eye-opening. Disappointing that Indiana elected him governor. Probably many of the voters had no idea about his beliefs, either. That's a big problem in the U.S. right now.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
4. Yep, far too many people IMO still think they are voting for old time republicans and
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 09:50 AM
Apr 2015

just robotically vote R, not realizing in many cases the new republicans are dangerous and intent on dragging this nation down and backward in so many ways.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court’s Big Gay P...