Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,066 posts)
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 12:39 AM Apr 2015

Can anyone remember a time Arkansas and Indiana elected DECENT people to statewide office?

With Govs. Mike Pence (IN) and Asa Hutchinson (AR) signing "right to discriminate" bills in the name of "religious freedom", it's pretty hard to realize that their states actually elected good people to statewide offices instead of these Religious Right followers.

Arkansas once had William Fulbright as senator. He often challenged US intervention abroad. Once a segregationist Dixiecrat, he voted for a civil rights bill for the first time in 1970. Gov. Winthrop Rockefeller, a moderate Republican, expanded primary and adult education and integrated public schools. He also reformed the state prisons.

And who can forget Bill Clinton, who rose from state governor to US president? I know he had his problems with his personal life and sold out American workers with NAFTA. But if Clinton and Hutchinson competed in an election I'd vote for Clinton.

Indiana - Sen. Birch Bayh drafted what would be the 26th Amendment, granting the vote to 18-year-olds. He also supported the Equal Rights Amendment and Title IX! His son Evan was also a decent senator (despite supporting the Iraq War and being part of the DLC).

Sen. Richard Lugar, a Republican, at least came to oppose US sanctions against Cuba. He was so sane about it that he managed to get primaried out of re-election in 2012 (but because Richard Mourdock pulled a Todd Akin, Democrat Joe Donnelly now has Lugar's seat). Lugar also told the NRA and gun lobbyists to go pound sand, too. Otis Bowen, a Republican governor of the state in the '70s, "vetoed legislation that would have restricted the right of a woman to seek an abortion" and as HHS secretary in Reagan's 2nd term "champion(ed) the cause of securing more funding for AIDS".

Nowadays, it seems that being a complete partisan regressive is a prerequisite to winning statewide office in those states. Look who's representing those states in US Senate and governorships. Tom Cotton. John Boozman. Dan Coats (whose seat rotated between him and E. Bayh twice since '89, after B. Bayh retired). Hutchinson. Pence. They can't hold a candle to their predecessors listed beforehand. (OK, I know Joe Donnelly's a Democrat, but has he really done much good so far?)

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can anyone remember a time Arkansas and Indiana elected DECENT people to statewide office? (Original Post) alp227 Apr 2015 OP
Yes indeed. elleng Apr 2015 #1
I didn't know Lugar lost his Senate seat. Major Hogwash Apr 2015 #2
Yeah, we couldn't have blasted Lugar out with dynamite. Chellee Apr 2015 #3
Meet Charlie Fuqua (R-Arkansas), Christian reconstructionist~ blkmusclmachine Apr 2015 #4

elleng

(131,227 posts)
1. Yes indeed.
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 12:41 AM
Apr 2015

and Rupert Vance Hartke (May 31, 1919 – July 27, 2003) was a Democratic United States Senator from Indiana from 1959 until 1977.

Chellee

(2,102 posts)
3. Yeah, we couldn't have blasted Lugar out with dynamite.
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 01:57 AM
Apr 2015

He had that Senate seat until the day he died or until he didn't want it any more, whichever came first. But the Republicans did him in, because he only voted with them 97% of the time, and that's just not good enough.

They ran Richard "Rape is something God intended to happen" Mourdock, and there was just enough sanity in the voting public for us to slip in Joe Donnelly.

Now, Donnelly is the kind of Democrat that can win in Indiana, which is to say, horrible. He's very nearly a Republican. But he votes with/for us some of the time, and Mourdock would have voted with/for us none of the time, so I guess from a pragmatic standpoint he's better than nothing.

But just.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can anyone remember a tim...