Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 04:47 AM Apr 2015

A Tale of Two Killings: What Happened When Idaho Police Shot a Dog and a Pregnant Woman in One Day

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/312-16/29431-a-tale-of-two-killings-what-happened-when-idaho-police-shot-a-dog-and-a-pregnant-woman-in-one-day

Two fatal police shootings unfolded within 14 hours, both in lakeside towns in the same corner of north-west Idaho.

The first victim was Jeanetta Riley, a troubled 35-year-old pregnant woman, shot dead by police as she brandished a knife outside a hospital in the town of Sandpoint. Her death barely ruffled the tight-knit rural community, which mostly backed the officers, who were cleared of wrongdoing before the case was closed.

The second shooting, in nearby Coeur d’Alene, sparked uproar. There were rallies, protests, sinister threats against the officer responsible, and a viral campaign that spread well beyond the town and drew an apology from the mayor. The killing was ruled unjustified, and the police chief introduced new training for his officers.

The victim of the second shooting: a dog named Arfee.

Two weeks ago, the dog’s owner received a payout of $80,000. Jeanetta Riley’s husband and three daughters have not, so far, received as much as an apology.

Both shootings occurred within a 50-mile radius of remote woodlands and lakes not far from the Canadian border. Each raised complex but different questions over the decision by officers to use their weapons.

The divergent reactions to the police killings of Riley, a mother of three, and Arfee, a Labrador-hound mix, speaks to a disturbing indifference to some human lives lost during encounters with police.
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Tale of Two Killings: What Happened When Idaho Police Shot a Dog and a Pregnant Woman in One Day (Original Post) eridani Apr 2015 OP
There's your 'family values' for ya. postulater Apr 2015 #1
Disturbing indifference to human lives lost in encounters with police Pooka Fey Apr 2015 #2
Brown shirts. blkmusclmachine Apr 2015 #3
Arfee didn't have a knife. Apparently, that's critical to deciding fault and compensation. Shrike47 Apr 2015 #4
Are our police so incompetent that their only option to deal with people who are clearly sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #18
I did shake my head malaise Apr 2015 #5
There's nothing free about this country. Madmiddle Apr 2015 #6
Two very different emotional chords Boomer Apr 2015 #7
You've encapsulated it quite well. Animals, esp ones like Arfee, arouse our feelings of Nay Apr 2015 #9
IT is only predictable in a certain segment of people Drahthaardogs Apr 2015 #10
Perhaps this helps explain the difference alcina Apr 2015 #8
Yah think? Gormy Cuss Apr 2015 #13
Understandable that the dog's shooting evokes a louder outcry Quantess Apr 2015 #11
OK--mental illness makes people into disposable human garbage. Got it. n/t eridani Apr 2015 #15
No, but I'm a dog lover. Quantess Apr 2015 #16
Only in a severely dysfunctional society. So considering which nation we are talking sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #19
That woman's life was diminished long before she got shot by cops. Quantess Apr 2015 #21
China agrees with you. I believe the death penalty for drug addicts is still the law in sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #22
No, China does not agree with me. Nice try. Quantess Apr 2015 #24
In terms of the death penalty for drug addicts, yes they do. Though even there I believe sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #27
#1 You just said I approved of her killing by cop. Quantess Apr 2015 #34
What about a feral, rabid dog? progressoid Apr 2015 #30
Am I required to feel a certain way? Quantess Apr 2015 #35
One thing that highlights Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #12
Maybe whatthehey Apr 2015 #14
You are supposed to display an appropriate level of outrage, whether genuine or not. Quantess Apr 2015 #17
Is that a joke? Because that is exactly what my reaction is to the murder of civilians with obvious sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #23
And I have no idea why OUR police have so little ability to deal with the mentally ill and feel sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #20
Was the dog armed? Stinky The Clown Apr 2015 #25
No, but he was shot in a town that values dogs over human beings jmowreader Apr 2015 #28
The person who wrote this doesn't read the Bonner County Daily Bee jmowreader Apr 2015 #26
Which makes the lack of so much as an apology even worse n/t eridani Apr 2015 #31
I think the lawyers have a lot to do with the lack of apology jmowreader Apr 2015 #32
Good point. Rhanks for the background n/t eridani Apr 2015 #33
Misanthropy is the default setting. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2015 #29

Pooka Fey

(3,496 posts)
2. Disturbing indifference to human lives lost in encounters with police
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 05:14 AM
Apr 2015

Humans are adaptable and Americans have adapted to their police state like so many other cultures - it's just more ironic when it happens in the Land of the Free.

It's hard to comment on a piece that describes how our culture has become so resigned to police murdering citizens, yet police killing a dog awakens normal outrage. This is an important story.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
18. Are our police so incompetent that their only option to deal with people who are clearly
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 03:52 PM
Apr 2015

disturbed is the death penalty?

How come the cops in other civilized nations can handle situations like this, which they do, so much more courageously and competently?

A recent statistic on our 'civilian police' as compared to the UK police eg, showed that our police killed more US Citizens in the month of March than theirs since the 1900.

Is there something wrong with their police or with ours?

 

Madmiddle

(459 posts)
6. There's nothing free about this country.
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 07:49 AM
Apr 2015

Fools coming to America think they're coming to riches and freedom. With the corruption growing stronger each and everyday, and the cops murdering people with impunity across this country, we are not free.

Boomer

(4,170 posts)
7. Two very different emotional chords
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 07:58 AM
Apr 2015

Our relationships with our pets is like having children and so many people can immediately identify with Arfee's owner and share his distress. We do everything we can to protect our furkids and then someone comes along and blows them away. This kind of event taps the fear of anyone with parental feelings of protectiveness and responsibility for a vulnerable loving creature. It's an intensely personal sense of tragedy.

We don't have that kind of emotional relationship with adults suffering from mental illness and/or substance abuse problems. Quite the contrary, our country as a whole recoils from people with mental illness, and substance abusers are seen as a threat to our personal safety and as a scourge in our communities.

This doesn't justify the different reactions and the indifference to the loss of human life at the police, but it's quite predictable.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
9. You've encapsulated it quite well. Animals, esp ones like Arfee, arouse our feelings of
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 09:02 AM
Apr 2015

protectiveness toward innocent creatures. Grown humans CAN be innocent in the sense that they are not guilty in a legal way of doing anything, but they are never assumed to be "innocent" in the sense that children and animals are, and our ire is often much stronger toward those who would wantonly hurt the innocent. Many people's experiences with other grown humans have hardened them toward feeling kindly toward any random human, and police can get away with much more brutality because of that.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
10. IT is only predictable in a certain segment of people
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 09:08 AM
Apr 2015

I could never figure out how people can value the life of a dog or a cat more than a human child. I do not see this about indifference to police brutality, but rather indifference to our fellow man.

alcina

(602 posts)
8. Perhaps this helps explain the difference
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 08:47 AM
Apr 2015
Jeanetta Riley was never going to be the kind of victim to elicit sympathy in a small, conservative town like Sandpoint. A Native American who was addicted to methamphetamine and alcohol, her life seemed in a downward spiral in the months leading up to her death on 8 July 2014.

My mother is half Pueblo Indian, and that heritage is very apparent in my sisters. (Me, on the other hand -- people around here usually think I'm Finnish, of all things.) But I forwarded this to them, and one replied: "Yup. Some people think we're no better than dogs."

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
13. Yah think?
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 09:54 AM
Apr 2015

The fact that she was Native American with substance abuse history probably had a lot to do with it.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
11. Understandable that the dog's shooting evokes a louder outcry
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 09:26 AM
Apr 2015

than a knife wielding, intoxicated person high on meth. Sorry.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
16. No, but I'm a dog lover.
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 03:39 PM
Apr 2015

I feel worse for innocent animals being brutalized than I do for humans, often.

Drinking and doing meth while pregnant makes me feel bad for her fetus, as well, may s/he rest in peace.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
19. Only in a severely dysfunctional society. So considering which nation we are talking
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 03:59 PM
Apr 2015

about, you are correct. There is simply little value placed here on human life.

This probably was always the case with Imperial nations. It's necessary to diminish the worth of human life in order to be able to dispose of it when it is 'in our interests to do so'.

'Treat the Iraqis like Dogs' ~ General Miller to his troops when going on his patriotic mission to 'turn Iraq into a Democracy'

Too bad we didn't do that.

A whole lot more innocent Iraqi men, women and children would be alive today.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
21. That woman's life was diminished long before she got shot by cops.
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 04:09 PM
Apr 2015

Otherwise she probably wouldn't be drinking and doing meth while pregnant. A person who is devalued from the start is going to be more likely to create that kind of life for herself, and lack regard for her fetus. I think it's gross to have that kind of disregard for your baby-to-be. She should have had an abortion, in my opinion.

I realize she had most likely had the odds stacked against her from birth, but I don't admire this person's behavior. Not saying she deserved to be killed, of course, but why am I required to feel worse about her killing than the dog's?

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
22. China agrees with you. I believe the death penalty for drug addicts is still the law in
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 04:14 PM
Apr 2015

that most democratic nation! Saudi Arabia also. Among other 'admirable' democracies. Though I don't think it is okay to mow them down on the street. I could be wrong of course.

Let me ask you something, do you think we should include drug addiction in death penalty cases?

And, have you ever known and/or loved someone who was afflicted with this disease?

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
24. No, China does not agree with me. Nice try.
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 04:28 PM
Apr 2015

They (often) eat dogs in China.

I see a lot of strawmen in your reply to me.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
27. In terms of the death penalty for drug addicts, yes they do. Though even there I believe
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 04:56 PM
Apr 2015

there is some kind of farce of a process. I am responding to your comment in which you totally condemned a pregnant mother of three who clearly was suffering from the disease of addiction, a minority, powerless in this society, and approved of her killing by cop.

Where are the strawmen?

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
35. Am I required to feel a certain way?
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 07:01 AM
Apr 2015

The whole point of the OP seems to be a definition about how an uninvolved person SHOULD FEEL.

The reality is, both the dog and the woman are dead, and how you or I FEEL about it makes very little difference. If I furrow my brow and shake my head disgustedly, what does that do? It's just a pointless gesture to others that I display the appropriate FEELINGS.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
12. One thing that highlights
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 09:36 AM
Apr 2015

beyond those pointed out by other commenters is that Idaho is acting different than most states. Most places, the dog's owner's wouldn't have gotten an apology or money either.

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
14. Maybe
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 12:49 PM
Apr 2015

Last edited Sat Apr 4, 2015, 02:39 PM - Edit history (1)

It's because the dog wasn't drunk/high, waving a knife, and capable of understanding verbal commands to stop brandishing deadly weapons.

An opinion formed before any hint of the person's ethnicity was mentioned, and not changed by it, any more than the opinion would have changed if the dog had been a schnauzer or poodle.

I certainly am concerned about the loss of human life by police actions. I am also unapologetically concerned at different levels dependent on what kind of human in what kind of situation. A 12 yr old kid in a park who was shot within a couple of seconds with no attempt made to ascertain his (nonexistent) threat level? Outrageous murder pure and simple. A knife-wielding unco-operative adult out of their gourd on mind-altering substances who had several chances to drop the knife? Maybe they might have tried tasers first, but not going to do too much second guessing. A criminal kid given a second chance at life who fled an armed assault and wrapped his car around a stationary object fleeing police? My only concern there is for his actual and potential victims, and the better human who missed the chance of his wasted organ donation.

I have no idea how or why people seemingly cannot react differently to different deaths, or why it is acceptable that they cannot.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
17. You are supposed to display an appropriate level of outrage, whether genuine or not.
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 03:44 PM
Apr 2015

You are supposed to furrow your brow, shake your head, and make an appropriately outraged comment. A bit less for the dog, a bit more for the meth addled, pregnant, knife wielding drunk woman. Apparently.

That is the whole point of this OP.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
23. Is that a joke? Because that is exactly what my reaction is to the murder of civilians with obvious
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 04:18 PM
Apr 2015

mental problems by the 'civilian' police in this country.

Do you believe in our judicial system where people have the right to be charged with a crime, to a defense once charged, before the Death Penalty is issued?

Consider that the 'appropriately outraged comment', emphasis on 'appropriately' in any civilized society.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
20. And I have no idea why OUR police have so little ability to deal with the mentally ill and feel
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 04:04 PM
Apr 2015

justified in administering the death penalty on the street to a pregnant, clearly disturbed, pregnant mother of three.

Are they so cowardly and afraid that this is all they can think to do?

I, eg, have dealt with a violent mentally ill family member where my own life was definitely in danger, he was almost twice my size and strength and yet, managed to deal with it without the need to murder the person.

Or is it just that we are a society that is traumatized by fear of those who are 'different', bigotry etc, that we have come to the point where killing those who we view as 'worthless' has now become acceptable?

There was another society that came to that point. Not so long ago.

I'm thankful to be able to say, count me out of such a society.

jmowreader

(50,567 posts)
26. The person who wrote this doesn't read the Bonner County Daily Bee
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 04:55 PM
Apr 2015

People in Sandpoint are PISSED over the Jeanetta Riley shooting.

jmowreader

(50,567 posts)
32. I think the lawyers have a lot to do with the lack of apology
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 11:11 PM
Apr 2015

The family of the woman who was shot are seeking $2 million in damages, and you can understand why. If the city apologizes for shooting her, the family's lawyers could use that as an admission of guilt.

Wonderful country we live in.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
29. Misanthropy is the default setting.
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 05:06 PM
Apr 2015

We don't value people as much as animals. Unless those animals can be made into casseroles.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Tale of Two Killings: W...