products or services to LGBT people.

Here is the original text:

https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2015/bills/senate/568#digest-heading

Religious freedom restoration act. Provides that a state or local government action may not substantially burden a person's right to the exercise of religion unless it is demonstrated that applying the burden to the person's exercise of religion is: (1) essential to further a compelling governmental interest; and (2) the least restrictive means of furthering the compelling governmental interest. Provides that a person whose exercise of religion has been substantially burdened, or is likely to be substantially burdened, by a state or local government action may assert the burden as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding, regardless of whether the state or a political subdivision of the state is a party to the judicial proceeding. Allows a person who asserts a burden as a claim or defense to obtain appropriate relief, including: (1) injunctive relief; (2) declaratory relief; (3) compensatory damages; and (4) recovery of court costs and reasonable attorney's fees.

Them the social network can do the rest. Or with the Yearning for Zion group in Texas, get many women to provide young girls for the pleasure of Warren Jeff's and his fellow pedophile buddies. They claim this is their religious beliefs.

Maybe best we keep this in the down low.

I assume you have not read the law. I do not want the law but this is just ridiculous. The law does not allow some "anything goes" just because of religion. The law requires a government balance between religion and society. It would never allow female mutilation. No court would allow it. We have had these laws for over two decades and the only thing these laws have allowed is the use of peyote by certain Native Americans. You have lost credibility with this OP.

http://www.csicop.org/si/show/faith_healing_religious_freedom_vs._child_protection

One of the first deaths Rita discovered that was not related to Christian Science was in Indiana. As Stauth tells the story:

4-year-old Natali Joy Mudd was found dead by detectives in her own home, with a tumor in her eye that was almost as big as the rest of her head. At the horrific scene, a police sergeant found horizontal trails of blood along the walls of the house. The trails matched the height of the girl’s head. Natali had apparently been leaning against the wall as she dragged herself from room to room, blinded, trying to find a way to freedom, before the tumor killed her. (Stauth 2013)

Natali’s parents belonged to the Faith Assembly Church, a Pentecostal offshoot. They didn’t believe in medical care, and they were not prosecuted because Indiana had strict religious shield laws. Two years later, Natali’s five-year-old sister died from an untreated tumor in her stomach the size of a basketball.

18 U.S. Code § 116 - Female genital mutilation. That is a federal law prohibiting the practice. IN is still part of the federal government. So it is prohibited in all 50 states.

You remind me of conservatives who said if we allowed gay marriage then people would be marrying their dogs, etc. There are no laws about that but I have yet to see it happen. Have you? The OP is totally false.

Ohh I see you changed your post completely before I put my reply up.

of the parents' religious beliefs.




They'd allow FMG based on religious beliefs, too, if the Federal govt. wasn't in the way.

http://www.csicop.org/si/show/faith_healing_religious_freedom_vs._child_protection

After you were caught. I won't join you in trying to run from the OP.

Good for the Federal law. But it doesn't change the fact that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act would allow FMG if the Federal law weren't standing in the way. And the law already allows child neglect and abuse under the guise of religious freedom.