Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riqster

(13,986 posts)
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 08:59 AM Apr 2015

Reagan’s Teabagging followers are wrong: Government is GOOD for Business.

Loads of source info at the link.

https://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2015/04/07/reagans-teabagging-followers-are-wrong-government-is-good-for-business/


Latest example of Adam Smith’s wisdom: Chattanooga, Tennessee. Since the private sector wasn’t going to provide the requisite infrastructure to support 21st-century businesses, the local and Federal (but not state) governments did the job. And now businesses are clamoring to relocate to the city with some of the best Internet access in the country:

Chattanooga rolled out a fiber-optic network a few years ago that now offers speeds of up to 1000 Megabits per second, or 1 gigabit, for just $70 a month. A cheaper 100 Megabit plan costs $58 per month. Even the slower plan is still light-years ahead of the average U.S. connection speed, which stood at 9.8 megabits per second as of late last year, according to Akamai Technologies.

As federal officials find themselves at the center of controversy over net neutrality and the regulation of private Internet service providers like Comcast (CMCSA) and Time Warner Cable (TWC), Chattanooga offers an alternative model for keeping people connected. A city-owned agency, the Electric Power Board, runs its own network, offering higher-speed service than any of its private-sector competitors can manage.

” People understand that high-speed Internet access is quickly becoming a national infrastructure issue just like the highways were in the 1950s,” Berke said. “If the private sector is unable to provide that kind of bandwidth because of the steep infrastructure investment, then just like highways in the 1950s, the government has to consider providing that support.”


The comparison to the Eisenhower Interstate Highway is appropriate. One might also consider the government’s essential role in providing electricity, water and flood control, and a host of other infrastructural necessities on which businesses rely.

Businesses need to make a profit. It’s what businesses do. No ethical (or rational) business would or could build something like public infrastructure. If a CEO were to propose building a, say, city-wide fiber network that would not make his or her company a profit, they would be (rightly) escorted to the door with their personal effects and never allowed back into the building. In fact, they could even be sued.

That is why governments are good for business: they provide an environment in which businesses can provide goods and services, and by so doing earn a profit. Anybody who thinks otherwise should try starting a business in a place with little or no government and see how they fare. Somalia comes to mind.

We should also note that the state government of Tennessee is full of Teapublicans and is a royal mess: they think that the Randians and Paulbots are correct about Reagan’s “government is the problem” crap. Indeed, the state is busily shooting itself in its supply-side foot. The Feds and Chattanooga locals pulled off their huge Internet success in SPITE of their Red State, not because of it.

(Teapublicans like to pretend that Adam Smith was somehow an Ayn Rand/Ron Paul/Rand Paul anti-government ideologue. But anyone who has actually READ his work knows that he was a lot smarter than that: he knew that some things that businesses wouldn’t build on their own were necessary for the people, society, and indeed businesses themselves to survive, thrive, and prosper.)
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reagan’s Teabagging followers are wrong: Government is GOOD for Business. (Original Post) riqster Apr 2015 OP
I wish I could relocate to Chattanooga. House of Roberts Apr 2015 #1
Comcast and its ilk were a big reason Chattanooga did what it did. riqster Apr 2015 #2
Yeah. Good for business, but bad for the ruling class' profits. Orsino Apr 2015 #3
Yep. The irony is, most businesses are not down with the Reaganistas. riqster Apr 2015 #4

House of Roberts

(5,190 posts)
1. I wish I could relocate to Chattanooga.
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 09:21 AM
Apr 2015

I'm 90 miles west of there now, so the weather would be pretty much the same. I'd get the 1 gig service, then try to afford a computer powerful enough to use it. With that kind of speed, I doubt you'd need cable TV at all. Then, bye-bye Comcast.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
2. Comcast and its ilk were a big reason Chattanooga did what it did.
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 09:33 AM
Apr 2015

IMNSHO, cable and other such companies are being too short sighted in this area. Some infrastructural investment now could be beneficial to their long-term profitability.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
4. Yep. The irony is, most businesses are not down with the Reaganistas.
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 11:00 AM
Apr 2015

But their voices, like ours, get drowned out by the plutocrats who buy lots and lots of "speech".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reagan’s Teabagging follo...