General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFL House Overwhelmingly Passes ‘License To Discriminate’ Adoption Bill (AA's, Gays, Single Moms)
On Thursday afternoon, the Florida House of Representatives voted 75-38 to pass a bill (HB 7111) that would allow the states adoption agencies to engage in any kind of discrimination if serving a particular family violates its religious or moral convictions or policies. The state contracts with several private agencies to manage its child-placement services, some of which are religiously affiliated. Under the bill, the state could not revoke a license nor refuse any funding to these agencies based on their decision not to place children with certain families.
Unlike how the religious freedom bills played out in Arkansas and Indiana, proponents of Floridas legislation were quite open during this weeks debates about the bills discriminatory intentions. On Wednesday, Rep. David Richardson (D) spearheaded efforts to undermine the bill with various amendments that would have carved out nondiscrimination exemptions. His first amendment would have prevented the state from funding organizations that discriminate; the bills sponsor, Rep. Jason Brodeur (R) responded, This amendment does the exact opposite of the entire bill. I was ask that you vote it down. It was, in fact, voted down 38-78.
From there, other members introduced separate amendments carving out discrimination exemptions for specific classes: one for race, one for marital status, one for sexual orientation, one for gender, etc. Among the amendment sponsors was Rep. Janet Cruz (D), who explained, I have a daughter whos gay and I want to make sure shes never discriminated against if she decides to adopt a child. In each case, Brodeur offered a substitute amendment each of which was identical adding instead only the words, An act by a private child-placing agency under this subsection does not constitute discrimination. The substitute amendments passed every time as the House essentially voted in favor of discrimination based on all of those classes.
When Brodeur was repeatedly asked to confirm that his bill would allow the various types of discrimination addressed by the proposed amendments, he usually demurred. Most times, he rejected the premise of the questions, insisting that he was simply protecting religious freedom. On at least one occasion, Brodeur did, however, admit the discriminatory intentions of his legislation. Richardson asked him, If a child-placing agency decided that they had a moral objection to having single moms adopt, would they be permitted under your bill to have that policy and then reject all single mothers from adopting in the state of Florida? Brodeur responded with a simple, Yes. Watch it:
more
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2015/04/09/3645307/florida-house-adoption-discrimination-vote/?
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)but this pisses me off. grrrrr
Oklahoma will be sure to follow.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)they work hard to embolden. It's an ugly political party.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)toward others. In other words, an ugly despotic group.
Rex
(65,616 posts)You got some competition in the EVIL FUCKWAD department! Here comes Florida to the rescue!
What country is this again? Stop the ride, I want off!
Rex
(65,616 posts)Set up companies that adopt children and the state cannot discriminate...just you watch. The GOP fuckwads have no IDEA what they've done here!
People many many many many times smarter then they, will exploit these laws to embarrass the GOP and more importantly help out the soon to be victims of discrimination.