Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 05:15 PM Apr 2015

Don't Expect Hillary Clinton to Stand Up to Wall Street

On March 24, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC) joined with progressive leaders in Iowa and New Hampshire to launch “Ready for Boldness,” a campaign to encourage presidential candidates to adopt populist economic ideas.

<snip>

Clinton reportedly will make her candidacy official this weekend. With Senator Elizabeth Warren showing no signs of running, Clinton likely won't have a formidable challenger for the Democratic nomination (few are bullish on Martin O'Malley's ability to put up a fight). But that doesn’t mean she won’t face pressure over the next 12 months. Progressives groups like the PCCC are deeply suspicious of her on a number of issues, most notably on financial regulation and Wall Street. “The big unchecked box when it comes to Hillary Clinton is where she stands on issues related to corporate power and economic populism,” Green told me recently. “Is she willing to really challenge powerful interests when that is needed to help the whole country?”

If her comments over the past year are any guide, then the answer to that question is no.

<snip>

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121385/hillary-clinton-announcement-dont-expect-populist-policies

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Smithryee

(157 posts)
14. Fantastic. It just means more for Bernie
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 07:49 PM
Apr 2015

And Hillary will be left behind, again, just like 2008.

I wonder if there will be anti-<NOMINEE> party group like the PUMAs from the 2008 after Hillary Clinton lost?

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
10. She also won't get my money,or support.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 07:09 PM
Apr 2015

If she is the nom, I won't be volunteering, manning phones, stuffing envelopes, or walking the precinct,
like I have done for Democrats for over 40 years.


She can win without me, but you are being unwise throwing away votes and activists at this point.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
12. That is GREAT,
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 07:33 PM
Apr 2015

because if Hillary is the nom, I will have cash and time to spend on myself & loved ones
instead of Wall Street puppets.

 

Smithryee

(157 posts)
15. Agreed. My cash is going to Bernie, if he announces
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 07:50 PM
Apr 2015

and I will knock doors, put flyers at the door, just to get people to learn about Bernie, and what he represents.

And I have never done that in my 39 years of existence..

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
5. cognitive dissonance among the BOG/pumas/3rd way
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 06:36 PM
Apr 2015

1. "Her coziness with wall street is a big lie!!!!"

2. "Of course she is a corporatist. You have to be to get elected!!!!"

They have us surrounded

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
13. I am not only concerned with her pro-Wall Street stance but also I don't
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 07:47 PM
Apr 2015

trust her to get the NSA/CIA Deep State under control.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
18. Yes. And the GOP loonies are designed to scare us into voting for a corporate suckup
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 08:17 PM
Apr 2015

Well, I'm not going to do it.

Each time we settle for the lesser of two evils the subsequent candidates become a little more evil.
Franklin and Eleanor would be appalled to see what this party has become.

I won't vote for Hillary. And I'll let the chips fall where they may.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Don't Expect Hillary Clin...