Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 06:29 PM Apr 2015

"America’s Pacific Century"- a detailed article by Hillary Clinton, Foreign Policy.com 10/2011

The future of politics will be decided in Asia, not Afghanistan or Iraq, and the United States will be right at the center of the action.

Hillary Clinton October 11, 2011

As the war in Iraq winds down and America begins to withdraw its forces from Afghanistan, the United States stands at a pivot point...

Snip

...With Iraq and Afghanistan still in transition and serious economic challenges in our own country, there are those on the American political scene who are calling for us not to reposition, but to come home. They seek a downsizing of our foreign engagement in favor of our pressing domestic priorities. These impulses are understandable, but they are misguided. Those who say that we can no longer afford to engage with the world have it exactly backward — we cannot afford not to. From opening new markets for American businesses to curbing nuclear proliferation to keeping the sea lanes free for commerce and navigation, our work abroad holds the key to our prosperity and security at home. For more than six decades, the United States has resisted the gravitational pull of these "come home" debates and the implicit zero-sum logic of these arguments. We must do so again.



Beyond our borders, people are also wondering about America’s intentions — our willingness to remain engaged and to lead. In Asia, they ask whether we are really there to stay, whether we are likely to be distracted again by events elsewhere, whether we can make — and keep — credible economic and strategic commitments, and whether we can back those commitments with action. The answer is: We can, and we will...snip

...Our treaty alliances with Japan, South Korea, Australia, the Philippines, and Thailand are the fulcrum for our strategic turn to the Asia-Pacific. They have underwritten regional peace and security for more than half a century, shaping the environment for the region’s remarkable economic ascent. They leverage our regional presence and enhance our regional leadership at a time of evolving security challenges...snip

...We are also making progress on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which will bring together economies from across the Pacific — developed and developing alike — into a single trading community. Our goal is to create not just more growth, but better growth. We believe trade agreements need to include strong protections for workers, the environment, intellectual property, and innovation. They should also promote the free flow of information technology and the spread of green technology, as well as the coherence of our regulatory system and the efficiency of supply chains. Ultimately, our progress will be measured by the quality of people’s lives — whether men and women can work in dignity, earn a decent wage, raise healthy families, educate their children, and take hold of the opportunities to improve their own and the next generation’s fortunes. Our hope is that a TPP agreement with high standards can serve as a benchmark for future agreements — and grow to serve as a platform for broader regional interaction and eventually a free trade area of the Asia-Pacific...

Complete article (free registration required) http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/

Some of Hillary's foreign policy, as described by Hillary. A must read.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"America’s Pacific Century"- a detailed article by Hillary Clinton, Foreign Policy.com 10/2011 (Original Post) nationalize the fed Apr 2015 OP
"...opening new markets for American businesses..." - H.R.C. Wilms Apr 2015 #1
Uh, yeah. That's what they said about NAFTA. How did that work out? nationalize the fed Apr 2015 #4
"Opening new markets for American businesses" via a military presence? arcane1 Apr 2015 #2
All Hail to the Wonderfully Benevolent, Workers' Rights truedelphi Apr 2015 #3
Yet another example of why... 99Forever Apr 2015 #5
why not bold this part OKNancy Apr 2015 #6

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
4. Uh, yeah. That's what they said about NAFTA. How did that work out?
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 07:03 PM
Apr 2015

Hillary said (at 4:04)

"Nafta did not do what many had hoped"



Not a fan of NAFTA during many debates. There are plenty of juicy quotes.
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
2. "Opening new markets for American businesses" via a military presence?
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 06:35 PM
Apr 2015

A bunch of fucking slogans to justify continued empire.

Read this with George W's voice in your head, and you won't know the difference.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
3. All Hail to the Wonderfully Benevolent, Workers' Rights
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 06:53 PM
Apr 2015

Protecting TPP!

And ALL Hail to Ms Clinton, for her efforts in bringing about this New Brave World!

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
6. why not bold this part
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 07:15 PM
Apr 2015
We believe trade agreements need to include strong protections for workers, the environment, intellectual property, and innovation. They should also promote the free flow of information technology and the spread of green technology, as well as the coherence of our regulatory system and the efficiency of supply chains. Ultimately, our progress will be measured by the quality of people’s lives — whether men and women can work in dignity, earn a decent wage, raise healthy families, educate their children, and take hold of the opportunities to improve their own and the next generation’s fortunes.

lofty goals --- of course it's been 3 1/2 years since this article or the time she was in the State department working for her boss, President Obama.

I'd say wait to find out how she feels about it's progress since then. She has had no part of it for several years.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"America’s Pacific C...