That was an interesting trick of my eyes.

Yeah I agree 1, 2 and 3, I'll think of more later.

there is a reason none have jumped in,,,,,,,,,

$. Hillary has it all.

the Fat Cats are not going to back a Progressive who wants to skin the Fat Cats.... Thank all those those you refused to vote over the last 20 years and let the GOP stack the SCOTUS to rule that Corps are people.

I turned 18 in 1991 and have voted in every election since. The very first vote I cast was for Clinton. Dont blame me.

Yeah. You blamed me.

that was supppose to read "Thank all those who refused to vote over the last 20 years". I really wasn't blaming you. I have no idea of your voting habits. Please accept my apology..

Really weak sauce.

you said you wanted a strong healthy primary battle for the Dems.... all we are lacking is a candidate.

your reasoning? You suggest there is a reason

And that reason is?

(+I should note that being half blind (and sort of lightheaded because of the champagne LOL) I don't type very fast and did not see the above back and forth)

I know a lot here back Sanders, but he cannot win. he's too old and that was one of the big strikes against McCain

because the Clintons are vacuuming up all the corporate money available to Democrats?

Named after Bill Halter, a liberal Democratic candidate for governor of Arkansas who was pushed out of the running by the state party establishment before the primary in favor of the more conservative Mike Ross, whose ass was subsequently handed to him on a platter in the general election.

Excellent questions! Don't expect any answers though.

Very well said.

Fuck you.

Eom.

If and when she answers these questions let's post them here at DU.

I want to be as informed as possible.

I'm much less interested in any one poster's personal opinions on these three vital questions.

I want to hear her explanations straight from her, unvarnished & unedited.

I started to put that in my post too.

I am not interested in some diehard Hillary supporters telling me their opinion or feelings - not that I don't respect those - but I want to hear answers squarely put and directly from the lady herself.

See 2008.

FDR made it happen in federal hiring and spending. Truman, Eisenhower, JFK, LBJ and, to an extent, Carter saw it through in policy and action.

The pukes have worked to destroy all their work for unions since Reagan in 1981.

if money wins campaigns every candidate will be looking for money from Wall Street. That is where the money is. The only way to negate money is with votes, many of them. To inspire the apathetic should be the goal.

is reserved for a future Clinton campaign, should they take the hint from promises in Blade Runner

I'd like to know how long she thinks she is going to live. Who takes on what may be the most difficult job in the world at an age when most people retire?
I honestly can not understand what she thinks she can contribute beyond what she already has that would make a grueling campaign and job worth it. She has done a lot for us. It seems a little absurd to me- and even to many of my die hard, feminist, Democratic, female friends in her age group.
I have wondered if she is caught up in the romance of a 2nd wave feminist being president or something?

I trust that Warren will only support her if she believes Hillary will actively pursue the goals that Warren strives for.
If she did, I would feel a lot better about Hillary being our candidate.

( It's odd how we refer to Hillary by her first name and Warren by her last but that's what seems to communicate clearest right now.)

whether Clinton adapts her ideas or not. She'll pretty much have to as a Democrat. Until then Warren should stay neutral.

If Warren advocated for Hillary as someone who will genuinely fight excessive power for the moneyed elite, it would pull Warren supporters to Hillary's side.

I doubt this will happen though.
I don't think Hillary really wants Wall Street reigned in.
It seems nearly all politicians of both parties think that Wall Street and large corporations grabbing more riches for themselves, even at the expense of our citizens, is good for the country.

But if she's not out there hitting the stump for Hillary after the nomination is tied up (assuming she is the nominee) she'll get a lot of shit from the DLC wing.

I am so sick of this DLC/Third Way crap, and the way that Hillary's husband has embraced the Bushes and campaigned against at least one liberal Democrat.

But I am almost resigned that we are stuck with who we are stuck with. There will be no Barack Obama this time around.

Candidate Hillary will likely not be the same as President Hillary. Hope for the best and continue pushing her in the right direction.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]

a place we never go.

There is no reason anyone should jump all over you about your post. I hope you get the answers you are looking for.

She is no friend to public education, at least, not any more. She needs to explain that and make some real strides to get the teacher vote back.

I refused to work for the Obama re-election campaign or give any money after he ended up being W. Bush 2 when it comes to education. I will continue to refuse to work for or give to any campaign that is against public ed.

I've said it many times-- those who voted to invade Iraq are unfit for public office.

I need to know what she's going to do about Wall Street's grip on us.

It's early yet, but continued silence is going to mean more of the same.