[font size=3]"I care that she is a violent authoritarian warmonger who supports bombings, drones, wars of aggression, the DHS, TSA, failed drug war, NSA, Gitmo, torture, bank bonus bailouts, corporatism, violations of human rights abroad and at home."

[/font size]


Thank you.

We marinate in lying propaganda and willful delusion to deny what our government and our corporate-purchased candidates have really become as a result of the billions in corporate cash corrupting our government. Hillary is not remotely a liberal. It is beyond surreal to even suggest that she is....yet this is the type of blatant, lying, Orwellian delusion that is repeated like a drumbeat to try to make us deny reality itself.

Hillary represents the continued corporate coup of our nation and the deliberate replacement of democracy with secret laws, secret courts, mass surveillance, suppression of dissent, mass propaganda, endless war for profit, and the systematic looting of the lives and futures of millions of human beings for the profit and power of a tiny elite.


Two plus two equals four. No more pretending.

Equating Clinton and the Republican field as one and the same tells me pretty much all I need to know about your political viewpoint.

I suspect you'd be hard pressed to find any Democratic candidate acceptable, and we've in you did, I'm not sure you'd be particularly concerned if they won as long as you could stick to your exacting purity standards.

Unfortunately, those us who DO have to vote here, also have to live with the consequences.

I'd love to see a sensible socialist as the Leader Of The Free World™. Since that's not going to happen, I'm going to speak my mind about the candidates that ARE available. Good luck with those consequences!

were one and the same.
He said he had problems with BOTH sides.

"Watching American politics serves to confirm my views - Cotton, Cruz , McCain and another Bush on one side, Hillary on the other."

Is that HRC made a video that showed how inclusive she was...what she has done and will do is not important at all...images on your TV is all that matters to many.

So we will continue with the insanity of doing the same thing and expecting different results...well perhaps we don't even have expectations anymore.

We do have horrible problems with low voter turnout.

As would a system that isn't so obviously oligarchic.

we'll take it from here

yet she is a 1000 times more Progressive than all the "other side" put together,,,,

Remember those that refuse to vote for the "lesser evil- greater good" candidate , votes against their own best interest!

Don't you think that is a tad hyperbolic?...considering they both support the wars, the banksters, and the same right wing policies?

When I hear that hyperbole I automaticly don't believe it...and with good reason.
And the right moves farther to the right so that the left is always the lesser evil, and we don't seem to notice that we have been moved right because of it.
And that is why they have the clown car out there...to scare us to the right. And it seems to be working.

from your logic,,,,you might as well take down her pic and put up a Stand with Rand ,,,

With us or against us was made popular by Bush and now we hear it all the time on a Democratic board...just what does that tell us?

I support Warren now and will support her until the democrats nominate someone...fuck that inevitability meme.

They *seek* 100 deliberately black-and-white, vitriolic threads about Hillary.

Anything to make sure the debate is narrowed to the topic of Hillary and only Hillary. What they *cannot* tolerate is to have the conversation begin to focus on possible non-predatory, less corporate alternatives.

And it is kind of insulting to think that people will fall for that "you are this or you are that" and one of them is always the awfullest one.
There are way to many intelligent people around here for that to work very well.