General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLook at this way, you might not like Hillary, but at least we have something.
We have a candidate in Hillary who is very popular and highly qualified. Compare that to the GOP clown car.
We don't have Ted Freaking Cruz being a frontrunner for our nomination. Those idiots are going to rip each other apart in the primary and most importantly blow through all that corporate cash fighting each other. If Hillary is the democratic primary winner, she'll rip whoever emerges from that GOP mess for sure.
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)Hmm. Very Popular.
47.9% Favorables. http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/hillary-clinton-favorable-rating
Barely breaking 50% now in the polls, and that is including ones from a couple months ago where she was well into the 50% zone. But hey, just because her numbers are slipping doesn't mean she's not popular.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_cruz_vs_clinton-4034.html
OK, if that's the new definition of Popular, I'm glad to be informed of it now.
Highly Qualified. Um.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_5:_Qualifications_for_office
Yeah. OK. She meets the qualifications. But then again, so do I. I'm pretty sure that nobody wants me in the Oval Office however. I could argue that I'm old enough, been born here, and have been a Resident within the United States my entire life.
Kurska
(5,739 posts)okaawhatever
(9,478 posts)Skinner
(63,645 posts)...EVERY two-term senator who has also served as secretary of state? Or do you only consider that comparison valid when the two-term senator/secretary of state is Hillary Clinton?