have you noticed her popularity among Democrats at all????

all show the same thing....

I also have links to sites with poll after poll showing the same thing too!


they are all in cahoots though right? Hillary bought them all off right?

Or do you have some for the future?

they have consistently said the same thing...

The betting sites....those are the ones predicting the future! That is what odds setting is....you know that right?

that A.Polls strongly reflect name recognition.
B.Hillary has been running for nearly 8 years.
C.Bernie has been running -1 days

Give it 90 days and THEN let's look at polls...

its called her record....

Bernie has been in the public eye for quite some time as well.....

currently Bernie has 0 odds....Hillary...77%

Even for Bernie...that is a snowballs chance in hell...

you think he can bridge THAT gap...hell thats not a gap...thats a freaking chasm!!!

resort to negative campaigning before your candidate has even announced.

Desperate defensiveness against what they believe to be a significant threat to their candidate's possibilities of winning is clear. If they believed that it was true that Bernie had no chance of winning, they wouldn't be getting so freaked out over his almost candidacy.

clinton is a shoe in.

freaked out? a simple question is a freak out?

what is this that some are trying to fabricate here? why?

clinton has had an amazing amount of trash dumped on her. much of it inaccurate and just plain stupid.

for sander supporter to portray he is being unfairly picked on is a fail.

but, like in all democratic primaries, there will be people questioning both, legitimately. there is no reason to expect that both candidates wont be challenged on their elect-ability, beliefs or any number of legitimate issues.

people are not gonna treat sanders with kids glove, nor does sanders need us to.

and you are right. sanders has a good record.

clinton does not have nearly the right record that a LOT on du like to project.

was equivalent to Rubio's or an African American's was to Carson's. Somehow I doubt it but when it comes to women they are all just the same.

defend hillary and hillary supporter. who fuggin' knew.

think it is accurate, hence my comment in that thread. but there is absolutely no reason someone cannot discuss about those too candidates social perception.

the first thing my 17 yr old said was.... he is a socialist. no way he would win.

we have discussed it since and he appears to be learning about sanders, looking for a candidate to get behind.

if i had gotten on the kids ass for daring to say something negative about sanders, instead of an informed discussion, he might not be open to sanders now, and excited about the race.

NOTHING comparable to a republican, teabagging, inarticulate and unaccomplished palin.

one was an appropriate question

one was just an ugly attack

You seem to be confusing "underhanded tactics" with completely legitimate questions about his viability as a general election candidate.

If Sanders supporters can't handle a few frank questions anyone would ask of any candidate without throwing a massive tantrum like we've seen tonight, then maybe the problem isn't with the other candidates' supporters.

Looks like the same cast of characters on DU, and like Kucinich his support is virtually nonexistent in the real world.

It's fine to support a hopeless candidate to make a statement, but I don't understand how anyone can sincerely believe that Sanders chances are any better than Kucinich.

comparing Bernie and Kucinich, both of whom are wonderful progressive liberals,

is a whole lot different to comparing HRC to Palin.

Night and day different.

The HRC to Palin connect would make sense if you were disputing a Bernie/Rand Paul comparison.

But that crap, thankfully, isn't happening.

I love Bernie Sanders, but at the moment I'm am supporting Hillary Clinton.