Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,869 posts)
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 07:42 PM Apr 2015

Baltimore riots: 'They even took the ATM' – Pakistani shop owner may have lost $100,000 to looters

"They even took the ATM," Faizan Shaheed declared as he and his sister, Kanwel, were helping to nail plywood sheets over the shattered windows of their aunt’s small Pakistani grocery on Charles Street in the downtown area of Baltimore, just one of so many properties ransacked by rioters, who went on the rampage following the funeral of a young black man who died in police custory.

The shop, Annapurna Grocery and Gifts, came under attack from a small mob in the middle of the afternoon. They smashed the windows and double doors before stripping nearly everything they could find. All that was left last night were lines of stripped shelves, some onions and a few empty sweet boxes.

===================================

"What is she going to do? This isn’t her fault. Is the city going to help her? She doesn’t even have insurance," said Kanwel, who said she left her children at home crying to come to help with the clean-up. "We wouldn’t even think that something like this could happen in Baltimore." She speculated that the young men may have targeted the shop because they knew it was owned by Pakistanis.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/baltimore-riots-they-even-took-the-atm--pakistani-shop-owner-may-have-lost-100000-to-looters-10208502.html



If they targeted this business because it was owned by Pakistanis they should be charged with hate crimes.

238 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Baltimore riots: 'They even took the ATM' – Pakistani shop owner may have lost $100,000 to looters (Original Post) ForgoTheConsequence Apr 2015 OP
"If they targeted this business because it was owned by Pakistanis" KamaAina Apr 2015 #1
Can't speak to this case in Baltimore SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #5
I remember the korean guys shooting back but I don't remember them being targeted. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2015 #10
Many Vietnamese businesses Texasgal May 2015 #97
I remember watching that on CNN. NaturalHigh May 2015 #27
"Widely known"? ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #110
Crickets? SickOfTheOnePct May 2015 #116
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #118
Burning down anyone's business is horrible SickOfTheOnePct May 2015 #120
Back to the ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #124
It's not up to me to educate you SickOfTheOnePct May 2015 #126
True ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #134
Yes, it was widely known. Desert805 May 2015 #184
This is not new: XemaSab May 2015 #187
Just FYI... NaturalHigh May 2015 #189
And because a Hip Hop Artist ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #190
Interesting NY Times article from 1992: NaturalHigh May 2015 #191
No ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #192
More victim blaming. Nice. NaturalHigh May 2015 #193
I did say that; but, I'll tell you a story ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #195
"One day, I" NaturalHigh May 2015 #196
No, the "One day I" was a mistake ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #197
Wow, that's really awful XemaSab May 2015 #198
That's the thing about the ghetto and poverty ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #200
Would it be better if the store wasn't there at all? XemaSab May 2015 #201
Good question ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #206
Would I shed a tear? Of course not. NaturalHigh May 2015 #199
My post has EVERYTHING to do with why ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #202
Do you have any evidence that the store owner in the OP mistreated anyone? NaturalHigh May 2015 #203
No, I don't ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #209
"are not burned by members of the community" NaturalHigh May 2015 #211
Okay. 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #212
I tend to agree it wasn't because of ethnicity. Shops and cars were damaged as a group effort still_one May 2015 #204
I completely agree ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #210
Maybe because gang leaders have said in interviews XemaSab May 2015 #213
And now we believe the words of "gang members" ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #214
Did the leadership of the city meet with gang members to discuss the riots? XemaSab May 2015 #215
I don't know. n/t 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #216
As the authority on the topic Desert805 May 2015 #217
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #218
Here's my source: XemaSab May 2015 #236
I don't think 1SBM thinks "people are making it up"; 1SBM is questioning an old facile narrative Recursion May 2015 #222
Ahh! Someone has actually read what I wrote ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #237
Many of the Korean merchants in the LA riots were specifically targeted. Xithras Apr 2015 #9
Thanks for taking the time. Desert805 May 2015 #186
Koreans were not in the wrong place at the wrong time in LA. craigmatic May 2015 #108
The rioting seemed pretty indiscriminate Cali_Democrat Apr 2015 #2
Are you watching "American Crime" by chance? ScreamingMeemie Apr 2015 #3
No. I haven't watched that show. Cali_Democrat Apr 2015 #4
Excellent! ananda Apr 2015 #6
It's incredible. Painful to watch at times, but worth it. ScreamingMeemie Apr 2015 #11
It is good! Agschmid May 2015 #25
I'm watching. Excellent show. one_voice Apr 2015 #8
google up ... CountAllVotes Apr 2015 #7
Tell that to the elderly in that community. former9thward May 2015 #53
"The city had begged CVS to put a store in that neighborhood." NaturalHigh May 2015 #71
WTF? CountAllVotes May 2015 #146
I said the elderly were using that CVS. former9thward May 2015 #159
Pack up and simply go away would suit me just fine! CountAllVotes May 2015 #172
Look up the business relationship romanic Apr 2015 #12
So you have no evidence they were targeted because they were Pakistani Cali_Democrat Apr 2015 #15
And you didn't try romanic May 2015 #17
Oh get a clue rjsquirrel May 2015 #104
So it's only racism by default against AA? Oktober May 2015 #44
they were targeted because they weren't black, because they were Chinese and Arab geek tragedy May 2015 #47
NONE here expressing sudden "concern"about ATM's or CVS's actually give a shit NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #78
So it's beyond phil89 May 2015 #109
Maybe we care about the people who aren't criminals XemaSab May 2015 #177
In a NY Times article, gang members said they directed looters... NaturalHigh May 2015 #18
I read that in a Salon article as well riderinthestorm May 2015 #21
Unfortunately I don't see this getting a lot of attention or concern here riderinthestorm Apr 2015 #13
Yep n/t SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #14
I noticed that too. NaturalHigh May 2015 #19
Particularly as they are Pakistani, and muslim. Two double whammies closeupready May 2015 #48
Brovo! Accurate comment. Calista241 May 2015 #67
Sounds familiar...... Beacool May 2015 #221
where have you been, young lady? i had some spare time this weekend, and made something for you... dionysus May 2015 #227
A banky!!!!!! Beacool May 2015 #234
Pretty much right. AngryOldDem May 2015 #225
Somebody should do a GoFundMe campaign for them. Seriously. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2015 #16
They should sue the mayor Boudica the Lyoness May 2015 #145
Damn, that's terrible! Duppers May 2015 #20
Definitely a hate crime Harmony Blue May 2015 #22
the looters successfully purged the neighborhood of the plague of small businesses. geek tragedy May 2015 #23
Why don't they have insurance? Agschmid May 2015 #24
Depending on a policy, it can run $55k or more/year riderinthestorm May 2015 #26
$55K per year? NaturalHigh May 2015 #28
Yup. And they may not have even been able to GET insurance riderinthestorm May 2015 #33
The "long term repercussions" are still rooted in police treatment of black folks Blue_Tires May 2015 #77
Some of us can walk and chew gum at the same time nt riderinthestorm May 2015 #82
You can mourn for the uninsured property loss; I'll mourn for the tragically needless dead... Blue_Tires May 2015 #84
Some of us do both. I'm sorry if that's too hard to understand riderinthestorm May 2015 #85
And some of us can fucking evaluate which one takes precedent over the other... Blue_Tires May 2015 #87
I'm bi-racial. That said, there's plenty of folks of all color concerned here riderinthestorm May 2015 #89
rider with all due respect JustAnotherGen May 2015 #105
Agreed and yes, I remember that conversation riderinthestorm May 2015 #119
I just see which side of the story you've spent all this energy arguing... Blue_Tires May 2015 #144
The property loss feeds the poverty and segregation Recursion May 2015 #223
I have my thoughts on this ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #238
Also it might not cover riots treestar May 2015 #99
Yep. Force majeure clause. Manifestor_of_Light May 2015 #207
That caught my attention too yeoman6987 May 2015 #29
I don't see them OR the CVS reopening. NaturalHigh May 2015 #32
Yep. I agree. The community will be hurt for years due to this. yeoman6987 May 2015 #35
CVS can afford to write off a rebuilt (and possibly reburned) store for PR purposes nt geek tragedy May 2015 #43
Yeah, I guess, but why would they? NaturalHigh May 2015 #51
As I said, as PR expense. Generate some nice warm fuzzy stories about not giving up on geek tragedy May 2015 #55
You're assuming CNN and 60 minutes actually give a shit about this store. Calista241 May 2015 #69
I doubt the publicity is worth a million dollars Travis_0004 May 2015 #81
Bitter laugh. Watts, Detroit, Newark and other riot torn neighborhoods prove otherwise riderinthestorm May 2015 #52
Yup, that's Detroit. roamer65 May 2015 #171
Sadly I don't think they're just trolls NobodyHere May 2015 #68
Because if you own a business in a high crime area insurance is prohibitively expensive./NT DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #37
most of these policies have force majeure clauses - so would not cover these circumstances DrDan May 2015 #38
Well there's one more store the rioters don't have to worry about. NaturalHigh May 2015 #30
Come on, sorry the store was victimized but are we expected to believe . . . brush May 2015 #31
No that's the expected amount of merchandise lost. NaturalHigh May 2015 #34
No but there is the cost of the merchandise dsc May 2015 #40
That ATM probably charged $3.00 per transaction Yavin4 May 2015 #36
so that justifies the looting? DrDan May 2015 #39
They were stealing daily from the community with that ATM Yavin4 May 2015 #60
Didn't ask if you felt sorry for them - i don't either DrDan May 2015 #61
"They were stealing daily from the community with that ATM"... NaturalHigh May 2015 #62
If the ATM fees were double what they are everywhere else, then you could say they were okaawhatever May 2015 #63
They're higher in that community n/t Yavin4 May 2015 #64
No they are not. nt Logical May 2015 #90
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #154
So it was the ATM going out an mugging people? NobodyHere May 2015 #65
Oh FFS, really silly comparison! nt Logical May 2015 #70
Yeah you would think so treestar May 2015 #101
Because there is nothing of value to them? Only paper. n/t oneshooter May 2015 #188
Absolutely pathetic. nt B2G May 2015 #41
Great opportunity for you Lurker Deluxe May 2015 #42
Because that totally justifies destroying a family's sole source of income nt geek tragedy May 2015 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author XemaSab May 2015 #46
That's the most clueless post I've read today. NaturalHigh May 2015 #59
Then dont use it Travis_0004 May 2015 #88
Instead of looting a local business treestar May 2015 #100
200 media filming & watching looters break in and steal from the charles street businesses, & Sunlei May 2015 #49
Why was that? B2G May 2015 #50
stand down and not have any police at all at area small businesses? Sunlei May 2015 #54
Oh they were there. They watched it all happen. B2G May 2015 #57
Because "it's only property". Meanwhile she lives in a gated community. Just sayin'. WillowTree May 2015 #58
From the mayor's own mouth: XemaSab May 2015 #56
That meme gets passed around a lot NobodyHere May 2015 #66
Is it true? If so, that's really all that matters. NaturalHigh May 2015 #72
Remember conservatives harping about Al Gore's "I created the internet" guote? NobodyHere May 2015 #73
So if it's taken out of context XemaSab May 2015 #79
That by giving the protesters the space to protest ... kwassa May 2015 #92
A good friend from high school lives in a "gentrified" part of the city JustAnotherGen May 2015 #106
Maybe, but Columbia Heights in DC took 40 years to get there Recursion May 2015 #224
There's a small difference JustAnotherGen May 2015 #230
I saw Wilkerson give a talk about the re-migration (at Howard, oddly enough) Recursion May 2015 #231
If you find it - post it in the AA Group JustAnotherGen May 2015 #232
"Old Country" was a literal quote Wilkerson got from kids in Chicago Recursion May 2015 #233
I've got a bunch of questions, but I'll start with Blue_Tires May 2015 #74
Small businesses 1939 May 2015 #75
Well, they didn't even have liability, much less property... Blue_Tires May 2015 #76
How does that happen? JustAnotherGen May 2015 #112
Liability insurance almost always has force majeure clauses riderinthestorm May 2015 #128
I'll answer riderinthestorm May 2015 #80
Just a goddamned minute Blue_Tires May 2015 #86
You can ask that question of the NYT then. They first reported it. riderinthestorm May 2015 #91
The OP title implies the shop owners somehow lost their $100,000 in the ATM kwassa May 2015 #93
It's the title of the article if you follow the link riderinthestorm May 2015 #94
Maybe, maybe not. kwassa May 2015 #95
I hope so. The seniors of that community lobbied CVS for that pharmacy riderinthestorm May 2015 #96
"I hope they are successful in persuading CVS to re-build"... NaturalHigh May 2015 #98
Challenge - the insurance thing treestar May 2015 #102
No ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #113
Yes, after reading the article treestar May 2015 #114
See my Post #115 n/t. 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #117
Yeah, since she didn't have insurance, she definitely deserved this. NaturalHigh May 2015 #103
We need to keep this in perspective Taitertots May 2015 #83
Okay. I haven't read the article at the link; but ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #107
That's what I'm thinking too JustAnotherGen May 2015 #111
Besides ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #115
Did you read the article? NaturalHigh May 2015 #121
Righteous rant? Is that what I wrote? n/t 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #129
100K seems a lot for a store that size treestar May 2015 #133
It adds up faster than you think. NaturalHigh May 2015 #135
$20,000 or more treestar May 2015 #137
More than I thought even. NaturalHigh May 2015 #138
Oh drat - sorry. I thought your post said "$200,000 or more." NaturalHigh May 2015 #169
I wonder if that $100K ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #139
How hard would it be for you just to B2G May 2015 #140
Not hard at all. No. ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #149
It just seems you are doing your best to minimize B2G May 2015 #151
From reading the OP title ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #158
No. You clearly haven't read the article. The $$ loss and the ATM are unrelated riderinthestorm May 2015 #161
What the HELL is "Reverse Bigotry"? 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #165
That is where a black person is ahead of a white person in line at the movie theater NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #174
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #175
The unfortunate headline implies something the article clarifies riderinthestorm May 2015 #123
Silly statements ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #131
#3 sounds right treestar May 2015 #132
one thing in your post made me have to reply.. dionysus May 2015 #228
A riot falls under force majeure. I'm sure they aren't covered in that case riderinthestorm May 2015 #122
I didn't know that. NaturalHigh May 2015 #125
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #127
I'm a small business owner with a force majeure clause in my policy. riderinthestorm May 2015 #130
This message was self-deleted by its author 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #136
So 10 years on DU talking about my small biz are all a front for this moment? riderinthestorm May 2015 #141
How many minks and rolexes are in YOUR storeroom? B2G May 2015 #142
My husband has on hand JustAnotherGen May 2015 #168
Does he want a steel/black/blue GMT, the new one? Ask him, he will know what I mean NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #176
I apologize and have deleted that post .. 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #147
Nicely done. nt B2G May 2015 #148
He has insurance: and Afrian American boy got his neck snapped! lewebley3 May 2015 #143
It is ABSURD to compare the MINIMAL property damage done when you realize NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #152
Agree: ATM and CVS are insured, and can be made whole with money! lewebley3 May 2015 #155
This thread is not about them B2G May 2015 #156
They are not wiped out: They have insurance: and the Have their lives!! lewebley3 May 2015 #163
Had insurance and were made whole 1939 May 2015 #167
They do have their lives, the boy with the snapped neck dosent have his life! lewebley3 May 2015 #170
Is Baltimore under the rule of white people? XemaSab May 2015 #173
this entire society is under the rule of white people mwrguy May 2015 #180
Who are the white people in charge in Baltimore? XemaSab May 2015 #181
Well they are only 16% of population! That put them at a disadvantage lewebley3 May 2015 #194
+1000 n/t 951-Riverside May 2015 #153
Freddie Gray was not a "boy". He was a 25 year old man. philosslayer May 2015 #219
No I actually thought he looked about 15, He just looked young! lewebley3 May 2015 #235
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #150
I'd ask ann--- May 2015 #157
i am saying, these criminals finally got up to what middle white crime steal, and get away with. seabeyond May 2015 #160
That totally makes it okay. romanic May 2015 #162
why do you do that? why do some argue in that manner? it isnt factual, it isnt a productive seabeyond May 2015 #164
Really? How much does the white middle class steal? NaturalHigh May 2015 #166
Am I reading your post as you meant it? Quantess May 2015 #229
I wonder how they treated their African American customers mwrguy May 2015 #178
Victim blaming, that's original! XemaSab May 2015 #179
Way to blame the victim. GGJohn May 2015 #182
That is a horrible thing to post. NaturalHigh May 2015 #183
Why wouldn't they take the ATM? PeteSelman May 2015 #185
Many rioters don't realize that RandySF May 2015 #205
Riots aren't a message; that's mostly a white liberal fantasy Recursion May 2015 #226
The ann--- May 2015 #208
Looters, loot. They don't care who owns the businesses they rob and burn. Beacool May 2015 #220
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
1. "If they targeted this business because it was owned by Pakistanis"
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 07:45 PM
Apr 2015

As my Scottish grandfather, who lived in suburban Baltimore for many years, would say, "I hae me doots". It is far more likely that the Shaheeds were just in the wrong place at the wrong time, like many Korean merchants were in south-central L.A.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
5. Can't speak to this case in Baltimore
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 07:51 PM
Apr 2015

but it was pretty widely known during the LA riots in 1992 that Korean businesses were targeted...it wasn't a case of wrong place, wrong time.

Texasgal

(17,048 posts)
97. Many Vietnamese businesses
Fri May 1, 2015, 09:12 PM
May 2015

were also targeted.

I have a few friends who's family lost everything during the LA riots. They never recovered.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
110. "Widely known"? ...
Sat May 2, 2015, 09:11 AM
May 2015


Korean-owned businesses burn = targeted
White-owned businesses burn = targeted
Jewish-owned businesses burn = targeted
Vietnamese-owned businesses burn = targeted

Black-owned businesses burn = CRICKETS
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
118. Okay ...
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:09 AM
May 2015

Black business burned = Not targeted, but burned anyway? ... Targeted, too?

Either way, it kind of weakens the racial argument, no?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
120. Burning down anyone's business is horrible
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:36 AM
May 2015

Targeting a business to burn down based on the race or ethnicity of the owner/operator is even worse, because it's based on bigotry.

I have no idea whether such targeting occurred in Baltimore - I haven't heard that it did. But it certainly happened during the LA riots in 1992, and yes, it was widely known at the time.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
126. It's not up to me to educate you
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:51 AM
May 2015

If you don't believe it happened, and can't take the time to learn about it for yourself, that's your problem, not mine.

Desert805

(392 posts)
184. Yes, it was widely known.
Sun May 3, 2015, 02:47 PM
May 2015

I was living just a few miles west. the Koreans that came in to the neighborhoods and opened up liquor stores were frowned upon. There's references to such in hip hop as well.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
189. Just FYI...
Sun May 3, 2015, 04:09 PM
May 2015

A sentiment expressed in a 1991 Ice Cube song:

So pay respect to the black fist
Or we'll burn your store, right down to a crisp
And then we'll see ya
'Cause you can't turn the ghetto, into Black Korea


Ice Cube is from Los Angeles, by the way.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
191. Interesting NY Times article from 1992:
Sun May 3, 2015, 04:20 PM
May 2015

In the South-Central area, where Korean shops have become the object of resentment even as they provide what is often the only retail service to residents, some shopkeepers climbed ladders to remove the Korean lettering from their signboards. At the Korean consulate, where National Guardsmen stood watch, an identifying plaque had been covered up by tape.

Yumi Park, the former director of the Korean American Grocers Association, said about 600 Korean-owned retail outlets had been damaged in the South-Central area and about 200 in Koreatown.

Lawrence Aubry, a member of the Los Angeles County Human Relations Commission, said Korean merchants had become a lightning rod for the discontent of some black residents. Many blacks in Los Angeles have remained poor as, one after another, immigrant groups have arrived and climbed past them to prosperity.

http://www.nytimes.com/1992/05/03/us/riot-los-angles-pocket-tension-target-rioters-koreatown-bitter-armed-determined.html


You seem to think people are making this up.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
192. No ...
Sun May 3, 2015, 04:34 PM
May 2015

I think that if the shops were targeted, it was not because of the ethnicity of the shop owner; but, rather, how the shop owner treated members of the community.

But what would I know? I have only been Black and have lived (and been active) in Black neighborhoods the majority of my life.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
193. More victim blaming. Nice.
Sun May 3, 2015, 04:37 PM
May 2015

Apparently everyone who gets their stuff looted or burned in a riot has it coming.

Stay classy.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
195. I did say that; but, I'll tell you a story ...
Sun May 3, 2015, 05:13 PM
May 2015

in 1994, I bought a house in a really impoverished community ... my house was surrounded on 3 sides by public housing. The entire block had 6 habitable houses on it.

At the corner of the street was a "grocery store"/gas station, that sold very little gas (as they charged 40 cents a gallon more than most gas stations) and was stocked with over-priced goods, and just right priced cigarettes, wine and malt liquor.

Being a smoker, I would stop in there about 2 or 3 times a week. On one occasion, I happened into the store. I noticed there was young woman (probably 15 or 16 years old) holding some "Pampers". She was clearly upset.

I came to learn that she was less than a dollar short on the price of the over-priced diapers ... she had been pleading with the shop owner to give her credit for the difference, until that coming Friday ... when her mother got a check.

I came in just in time to hear the shop owner telling her that she could have the diapers for what she had, if she gave him a BJ.

Of course I was aghast ... I reached into my pocket and gave her the money for the diapers.

The shop owner got mad at me for giving her the money. He refused to accept the money from the young woman ... AND he refused to sell me the cigarettes; telling me that I should just mind my own business.

Tell me you would shed a tear for that shop keeper if his shop burned down.

One day, I

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
196. "One day, I"
Sun May 3, 2015, 05:22 PM
May 2015

I think you hit the post button before you finished your reply. Please finish what you were planning to say.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
198. Wow, that's really awful
Sun May 3, 2015, 05:36 PM
May 2015

I bet most people who run small stores in the ghetto are just like that. They should all have their stores burned down.

Or, you know, people could stop patronizing that business.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
200. That's the thing about the ghetto and poverty ...
Sun May 3, 2015, 05:44 PM
May 2015
Or, you know, people could stop patronizing that business.


The lack of shopping choice, and the expense of transportation, makes not patronizing abusive store owners a non-option when you have an immediate need.
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
206. Good question ...
Sun May 3, 2015, 06:04 PM
May 2015

I vacillate on that ... On the one hand, the store does provide stuff the community needs and wants; but, at what cost?

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
199. Would I shed a tear? Of course not.
Sun May 3, 2015, 05:37 PM
May 2015

If someone burned it down, though, I would want the arsonist prosecuted.

Your story really has nothing to do with the family in the OP or the Korean families in L.A. The store owner that you described was a reprehensible cockroach, but it doesn't cast guilt on these victims.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
202. My post has EVERYTHING to do with why ...
Sun May 3, 2015, 05:52 PM
May 2015

shop owners get targeted for burning ... and it has NOTHING to do with their ethnicity; but rather, everything to do with how they treat the community wherein they are located.

Do I know this particular shop owner mistreated the community? No. I don't. But I know that store owners that treat the community well, are not burned by members of the community.

But again ... what do I know? I've only lived it.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
203. Do you have any evidence that the store owner in the OP mistreated anyone?
Sun May 3, 2015, 05:55 PM
May 2015

You are using the example of one store owner in your past to justify the crime described in the OP.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
209. No, I don't ...
Sun May 3, 2015, 06:14 PM
May 2015

that's why I said;

Do I know this particular shop owner mistreated the community? No. I don't. But I know that store owners that treat the community well, are not burned by members of the community.


But if you think that is not the norm, you are woefully, ignorant/mis-informed.

still_one

(92,470 posts)
204. I tend to agree it wasn't because of ethnicity. Shops and cars were damaged as a group effort
Sun May 3, 2015, 05:56 PM
May 2015

Which is what happens when crowds becomes disorderly, and riot





 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
210. I completely agree ...
Sun May 3, 2015, 06:16 PM
May 2015

but some wish to make this about race. I wonder why? Maybe it's the "reverse discrimination" thing.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
213. Maybe because gang leaders have said in interviews
Sun May 3, 2015, 06:37 PM
May 2015

that they told the crowd to go after non-black-owned businesses.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
214. And now we believe the words of "gang members" ...
Sun May 3, 2015, 06:44 PM
May 2015

but more, the media sources reporting said self-serving "interviews"?

Okay.

Desert805

(392 posts)
217. As the authority on the topic
Sun May 3, 2015, 09:15 PM
May 2015

Maybe you should?


You could also accept the words of the Angelenos who lived it, and the rioters who perpetrated it, but whatever.

You've got an axe-- grind it.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
218. LOL ...
Sun May 3, 2015, 09:25 PM
May 2015

I have not claimed authority status.

I could accept "the words of the Angelenos who lived it" ... but Los Angeles is a big place with some "experiencing" it and others "experiencing" it via the media. Right? But whatever.

the words of the Angelenos who lived it




Please tell me ... What ax do you think I have to grind?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
222. I don't think 1SBM thinks "people are making it up"; 1SBM is questioning an old facile narrative
Mon May 4, 2015, 01:13 AM
May 2015

and asking (quite reasonably, IMO), if there is any actual evidence that Asian-owned businesses were "targeted" or damaged at a greater rate than black-owned businesses. If anybody has any numbers that speak to that, it would be a good response to 1SBM's question.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
9. Many of the Korean merchants in the LA riots were specifically targeted.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:01 PM
Apr 2015

There had been racial tensions between the African Americans and Korean American communities in that area long before the Rodney King incident. Area residents had complained for years about the Korean shopkeepers treating them all like criminals, and many were still furious about a Korean shopkeeper who had shot and killed a 15 year old African American girl she accused of shoplifting. Even though witnesses and video recordings clearly showed that there was no danger and that the shopkeeper had essentially executed her with a shot to the back of the head, and even though the police showed that she had the money to pay for the item IN HER HAND and was going to pay for it, the shopkeeper was still only given probation and a $500 fine. A $500 fine for cold-blooded murder.

That conviction came down only a few months before the Rodney King verdict. That anger, combined with years of (real or perceived) abuse at the hands of the Korean merchant community, led a lot of the rioters to target Koreatown.

 

craigmatic

(4,510 posts)
108. Koreans were not in the wrong place at the wrong time in LA.
Sat May 2, 2015, 09:08 AM
May 2015

Sure people back then were mad at the white cops but they took the opportunity to get even with Koreans who they viewed as just as racist towards blacks when they went into their stores and got profiled and followed around like they were going to steal something just because they were black. It's not right but it is understandable considering they knew they were in black neighborhoods but disliked black people. I'm not saying these Pakistanis did the same thing but if they did its understandable.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
2. The rioting seemed pretty indiscriminate
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 07:46 PM
Apr 2015

I don't see evidence the shop owners were targeted because they're Pakistani.

Was CVS targeted because most of the shareholders are white?

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
3. Are you watching "American Crime" by chance?
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 07:47 PM
Apr 2015

The parallels to some of the stuff I have seen posted here lately are jawdropping.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
11. It's incredible. Painful to watch at times, but worth it.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:03 PM
Apr 2015

Felicity Huffman deserves an Emmy for portraying the hate that exists in this country by those who don't even realize they are racist.

CountAllVotes

(20,878 posts)
7. google up ...
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 07:58 PM
Apr 2015

Jeb Bush Caremark and see what you find my friend!!!

While it is old news, it is NEWS nonetheless and makes any Democrat with a brain wish to BOYCOTT CVS Caremark if at all possible!!!

former9thward

(32,100 posts)
53. Tell that to the elderly in that community.
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:37 AM
May 2015

That CVS was the only place they could get their prescriptions. The city had begged CVS to put a store in that neighborhood. I'm sure you will be right there to help...

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
71. "The city had begged CVS to put a store in that neighborhood."
Fri May 1, 2015, 01:29 PM
May 2015

And I doubt that CVS will be in any hurry to rebuild there.

CountAllVotes

(20,878 posts)
146. WTF?
Sat May 2, 2015, 11:39 AM
May 2015

What makes you think I am "elderly"? I am far worse than being elderly believe me.

I am totally 100% disabled and forced to used this Nazi fascist pharmacy.

I hate the fuckers ok? They SUCK and they are ripping me off!!!!



former9thward

(32,100 posts)
159. I said the elderly were using that CVS.
Sat May 2, 2015, 12:30 PM
May 2015

I said nothing about your age or condition. Maybe some rioters will come around and burn your CVS down. That way you will not be forced to use a "nazi fascist" pharmacy that "sucks" and is "ripping you off".

CountAllVotes

(20,878 posts)
172. Pack up and simply go away would suit me just fine!
Sun May 3, 2015, 01:32 AM
May 2015

Last edited Sun May 3, 2015, 02:59 AM - Edit history (2)

and no, I am not the only one being ripped off by them and being told what I can and cannot have. I frankly hope I see the day when some rich person out there sues the hell out of them writing for telling a physician what drugs they can and cannot RX. FUCK THEM.

Since when has this fascist pharmacy gotten so damn powerful?

Answer: The day the BFFE became involved in their "business practices".

On edit: If you think the elderly have it bad, you should see what people in my boat go through. It is much worse as they discriminate and give the disabled the lowest level crud they can push off and the cheapest crummiest generic drugs that can be found from third world countries and no, I am not kidding about that! Shame on them!! They get away with it because ... they can.

They are like a cancer in this land, spreading out of control and acting as if they are GOD when in fact they are a disastrous company that deserves to go belly up ASAP! I cannot tell you how many mom and pop pharmacies have had to hang the out-of-business signs on their door thanks to the likes of CVS/Caremark! Bad for jobs and bad for business!! The last time I was in there they gave me the wrong RX and still attempted to collect money from me!






romanic

(2,841 posts)
12. Look up the business relationship
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:24 PM
Apr 2015

between Arab/Chaldean owned businesses located in mostly-black neighborhoods.

Maybe the owners weren't specifically targeted for being Pakistani; they could've been targeted for not being black in a black area.

romanic

(2,841 posts)
17. And you didn't try
Fri May 1, 2015, 01:30 AM
May 2015

to look up Arab/Black economic relationships in black neighborhoods. Or maybe you did and it ruined your narrative so your pretending it doesn't matter. Whatever.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
47. they were targeted because they weren't black, because they were Chinese and Arab
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:29 AM
May 2015

and Muslim

Which is still racist.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
78. NONE here expressing sudden "concern"about ATM's or CVS's actually give a shit
Fri May 1, 2015, 07:08 PM
May 2015

and I am SICK of them



but I better not EVER respond directly to any of them, i will be silenced if I do

this thread is sickening...disgusting

 

phil89

(1,043 posts)
109. So it's beyond
Sat May 2, 2015, 09:11 AM
May 2015

your understanding that people may care about the aging population? Or that people can thin critically about the effects of losing resources in a community?? Have fun wallowing in anger.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
177. Maybe we care about the people who aren't criminals
Sun May 3, 2015, 11:59 AM
May 2015

who have to live with the consequences of what the criminals did.

Why don't you care about the 99.9% of people in that neighborhood who protested peacefully or who--gasp! horror!--had other things to do like work and take care of their families?

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
21. I read that in a Salon article as well
Fri May 1, 2015, 09:57 AM
May 2015
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/crime/2015/04/baltimore_gang_violence_is_the_city_overrun_with_crips_and_bloods_or_is.2.html#

Lost amid the viral frenzy over that seemingly encouraging segment was the fact that, in a separate conversation, a member of the Crips told a New York Times reporter that he and other gang members had sought to protect only black-owned businesses from looters, while directing them instead toward Chinese- and Arab-owned stores.
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
13. Unfortunately I don't see this getting a lot of attention or concern here
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:26 PM
Apr 2015

The collective DU mindset appears to be "too bad, so sad" - these folks just don't realize they should be honored their business was destroyed to send a "message" to the world.

Thanks for posting though.



 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
48. Particularly as they are Pakistani, and muslim. Two double whammies
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:30 AM
May 2015

in the view of many DU members. I've learned that the hard way.

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
221. Sounds familiar......
Mon May 4, 2015, 01:12 AM
May 2015

The poor souls had no choice but to loot and burn. How dare Obama call them thugs. They are just misunderstood.




The only thing these people did was undermine those who were legitimately protesting against police abuse without resorting to violence.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
227. where have you been, young lady? i had some spare time this weekend, and made something for you...
Mon May 4, 2015, 07:07 AM
May 2015


I was wondering if you were around to receive it!

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
234. A banky!!!!!!
Mon May 4, 2015, 01:20 PM
May 2015

How do you manage to find so many new bankies???

I get tired of the constant fighting around here. I poke my head a little and when I get sick of getting smacked around, I go away for a while.

It's always nice to see you, my friend.

Hugs........

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
225. Pretty much right.
Mon May 4, 2015, 06:30 AM
May 2015

Who are we, after all, to criticize how people express their rage against the societal machine? An ATM lifter, or someone who cleans out a liquor store, is just as outraged over Freddie Gray as the next person, and we have no right to point it out as the shameless crime and opportunism that it is.

 

Boudica the Lyoness

(2,899 posts)
145. They should sue the mayor
Sat May 2, 2015, 11:31 AM
May 2015

for telling the police to stand down and not do their job.

"Give the space to destroy".

Duppers

(28,127 posts)
20. Damn, that's terrible!
Fri May 1, 2015, 09:23 AM
May 2015

In the long run, these "kids" have hurt themselves. Merchants will be reluctant to come back into the neighborhood. I'm sympathetic to their plight but they shouldn't have done this. I don't have any good answers.




 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
23. the looters successfully purged the neighborhood of the plague of small businesses.
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:02 AM
May 2015

Empty storefronts and vacant lots will do wonders for the community. Lots of jobs I hear.



 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
26. Depending on a policy, it can run $55k or more/year
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:09 AM
May 2015

Im guessing as a small business in an impoverished neighborhood, they simply couldn't afford it.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
33. Yup. And they may not have even been able to GET insurance
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:16 AM
May 2015

some of the worst poverty stricken neighborhoods are simply uninsurable.

I will tell you now, that Baltimore neighborhood is now uninsurable. Anyone who opens up a shop there now will not have insurance. This has been repeated numerous times over the past few days but too many DUers have been glossing over the long term repercussions for this community.



Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
77. The "long term repercussions" are still rooted in police treatment of black folks
Fri May 1, 2015, 07:06 PM
May 2015

and how so many of us "accidentally" end up dead...Keep your eye on the ball...

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
85. Some of us do both. I'm sorry if that's too hard to understand
Fri May 1, 2015, 07:39 PM
May 2015

The pain and horror of deaths like Freddie Grays, and the long term devastation to this community from the rioting aren't mutually exclusive.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
87. And some of us can fucking evaluate which one takes precedent over the other...
Fri May 1, 2015, 07:56 PM
May 2015

I'm saddened that you're so indifferent to treat them both equally...

But I don't blame you, since DU always seems to go through this song-and-dance when racial strife is on primetime news, and it's something you'll never fully understand if you're not one of us...

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
89. I'm bi-racial. That said, there's plenty of folks of all color concerned here
Fri May 1, 2015, 08:10 PM
May 2015

I haven't prioritized the economic fall-out over the deaths of people in the AA community at the hands of the police. Please don't put words in my mouth.

JustAnotherGen

(31,961 posts)
105. rider with all due respect
Sat May 2, 2015, 08:37 AM
May 2015

A few months ago you and I engaged in an exchange where you point blank explained - you don't have the same experience of America because you don't appear as a bi racial woman - the way I do as a bi racial woman. It was the exchange where you seemed upset that I couldn't give weight in the modern era to the issues in Ireland of years past . . . Remember? I couldn't feel empathy because My Irish ancestry is solid Protestant - lace curtain variety.

How we experience things, the influence of our elders will make us lean in different directions.

You may not feel as connected to the black American experience as others do. My father was an expat from Alabama ((I grew up in Western NY )For me - this brutality is nothing new. This has been going on for 150 years - but now we have citizen surveillance on our side. I had his real time experience to look to, my own in a majority white community in the 70's and 80's, the warmth of being able to retreat into my friends whose mom's were also involved in Jack and Jill, etc etc that alone provided a shared empathy and experience in America.

Now we can document these things real time - The cell phone is mightier than the gun. Who knew? And what the cell phone showed was so horrific - that charges and arrests have been made.

If these were hate crimes - then that too shall be revealed. But - if you stand back and really take a look at the OP-

You can't see where he has been visible in calling things hate crimes when it is human beings who are black and losing their lives.

Maybe I'm wrong? If I am I will apologize to him.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
119. Agreed and yes, I remember that conversation
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:32 AM
May 2015

I'm not taking the bait that this is or is not a hate crime. I don't know enough about the neighborhoods dynamics to speak to that. If you search this thread, I specifically offer no commentary about the racial aspect of the destruction other than the words of a single reporter from the NYT.

My only concern on this thread, is the long term destruction to this community and how they overcome what's happened there.

This concern doesn't outweigh the greater problem of police violence towards black men.

That is first and foremost the greater issue. This thread is tangential to that and caught my eye because of the lack of economic recovery in similarly riot-torn neighborhoods historically.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
144. I just see which side of the story you've spent all this energy arguing...
Sat May 2, 2015, 11:31 AM
May 2015

So what conclusion am I to make?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
223. The property loss feeds the poverty and segregation
Mon May 4, 2015, 05:57 AM
May 2015

You're acting like these two problems can be treated separately; they can't.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
238. I have my thoughts on this ...
Tue May 5, 2015, 08:36 AM
May 2015

but it is, admittedly, a "chicken and egg" argument ... does The property loss feeds the poverty and segregation? Or, does the poverty and segregation feed the property loss?

No one destroys what is theirs ... It has been shown, people take much better care of the house where they hold the title/mortgage; than, they do for houses they rent ... Likewise, people tend to protect/protected the shop owners that treated the community members with respect, i.e., acted as community members, rather than, (and I know folks will react negatively to this word) "parasites".

treestar

(82,383 posts)
99. Also it might not cover riots
Sat May 2, 2015, 08:01 AM
May 2015

I remember clauses in auto insurance policies - Acts of God or war or riots were not covered.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
29. That caught my attention too
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:13 AM
May 2015

I don't see them reopening. It would cost a lot of out of pocket money to reopen. Sad. I was surprised when many here said it didn't matter about these places. I hope they were trolls and not liberal.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
32. I don't see them OR the CVS reopening.
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:15 AM
May 2015

Who would want to take the risk of doing business in an area like that?

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
51. Yeah, I guess, but why would they?
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:34 AM
May 2015

Take the insurance, remove the rubble, sell the site, and write off the loss. That would make a lot more sense than rebuilding in a high-risk area.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
55. As I said, as PR expense. Generate some nice warm fuzzy stories about not giving up on
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:40 AM
May 2015

Baltimore, rebuilding together, part of your community, blah blah blah.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
69. You're assuming CNN and 60 minutes actually give a shit about this store.
Fri May 1, 2015, 01:21 PM
May 2015

In any case, it will be a at least a year before they even attempted to rebuild the store. And we'll be 2/3 of the way into a Presidential election.

Somehow I doubt 10 seconds of positive PR will prompt a public company to build a store in an "unsafe" location.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
81. I doubt the publicity is worth a million dollars
Fri May 1, 2015, 07:16 PM
May 2015

People move on quickly. In 6 months this wont be a front page story anymore.

I would be very suprised if they rebuild.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
52. Bitter laugh. Watts, Detroit, Newark and other riot torn neighborhoods prove otherwise
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:35 AM
May 2015

Most stores in those neighborhoods, including the chain stores, never came back. On top of the fact that they can't get insurance, they can't even get any loans to re-build.

roamer65

(36,747 posts)
171. Yup, that's Detroit.
Sat May 2, 2015, 04:23 PM
May 2015

Endless rows of vacant lots, abandoned or burned out homes and empty storefronts.

 

NobodyHere

(2,810 posts)
68. Sadly I don't think they're just trolls
Fri May 1, 2015, 01:18 PM
May 2015

Many people here have a hatred for anything related to "business".

brush

(53,925 posts)
31. Come on, sorry the store was victimized but are we expected to believe . . .
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:15 AM
May 2015

there was $100,000 lost from the ATM of small neighborhood grocery store?

And there was no insurance to cover their loss?

Come on!

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
34. No that's the expected amount of merchandise lost.
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:17 AM
May 2015

The ATM and its contents are likely property of the sponsoring bank.

dsc

(52,170 posts)
40. No but there is the cost of the merchandise
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:24 AM
May 2015

the cost of the shelves etc, the cost of the building, the cost of the ATM. I can easily see 100k

Yavin4

(35,453 posts)
60. They were stealing daily from the community with that ATM
Fri May 1, 2015, 11:04 AM
May 2015

So, in this case, no. I don't feel sorry that the ATM was stolen.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
62. "They were stealing daily from the community with that ATM"...
Fri May 1, 2015, 11:38 AM
May 2015

You know that for a fact, or are you just making that up to justify the destruction of this family's business?

BTW, you know that the ATM almost certainly didn't belong to this little business, right?

okaawhatever

(9,469 posts)
63. If the ATM fees were double what they are everywhere else, then you could say they were
Fri May 1, 2015, 12:02 PM
May 2015

taking advantage of the local market. Truth is, those fees are high everywhere you go.

Response to Yavin4 (Reply #64)

 

NobodyHere

(2,810 posts)
65. So it was the ATM going out an mugging people?
Fri May 1, 2015, 01:10 PM
May 2015

Or was it sitting there waiting for people to VOLUNTARILY use it.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
101. Yeah you would think so
Sat May 2, 2015, 08:03 AM
May 2015

I mean look what the evil "banksters" have done. Maybe they should go to Wall Street and loot there, we could cheer them on.

Lurker Deluxe

(1,039 posts)
42. Great opportunity for you
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:26 AM
May 2015

Now that the greedy bank owned ATM is gone, it gives you the opportunity to go purchase one and place it in a high risk area. Of coarse you will charge no fees for this service and when it gets vandalized, and it will, just call it a life lesson on how the world works.

Luck!!

Response to Yavin4 (Reply #36)

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
88. Then dont use it
Fri May 1, 2015, 07:59 PM
May 2015

That wasnt difficult to figure out.

Also, ATMs cost money, you have to pay somebody to fill it etc. It takes up space in a store.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
100. Instead of looting a local business
Sat May 2, 2015, 08:02 AM
May 2015

shouldn't they look for Baltimore's version of Wall Street and break in and loot there? Hit the banksters and the corporatists rather than their neighbors?

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
49. 200 media filming & watching looters break in and steal from the charles street businesses, &
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:31 AM
May 2015

not a police officer in sight.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
50. Why was that?
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:33 AM
May 2015

Because there appears to be ample evidence that they were told by the Mayor to stand down that day.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
54. stand down and not have any police at all at area small businesses?
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:40 AM
May 2015

sure had enough police for City Hall.

 

NobodyHere

(2,810 posts)
73. Remember conservatives harping about Al Gore's "I created the internet" guote?
Fri May 1, 2015, 01:47 PM
May 2015

Same thing here. Things have to be put in context.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
92. That by giving the protesters the space to protest ...
Fri May 1, 2015, 08:22 PM
May 2015

they inadvertently gave space to the opportunists to start looting. It was not intentional.

JustAnotherGen

(31,961 posts)
106. A good friend from high school lives in a "gentrified" part of the city
Sat May 2, 2015, 08:51 AM
May 2015

She is of the mindset - we will see that area turned into a place of $1.2 million dollar brownstones and Starbucks with a Lulumon store and maybe a White House Black Market store. It will be back - but not what it was.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
224. Maybe, but Columbia Heights in DC took 40 years to get there
Mon May 4, 2015, 06:09 AM
May 2015

I remember back in the 90s half of the storefronts on 14th street were still shuttered (and plenty of lots were still burned down). U Street had Ben's (perennially) and that one chicken and waffles place, and that was it. You wanted groceries? There was Sonya's on 11th which might or might not have lunchmeat or produce that day. You wanted anything else? Take the bus to Ft. Totten and get on the Metro out to Maryland. Oddly enough, all of the complaints I heard about Target finally moving in were from white people who were worried the neighborhood wouldn't be "authentic" anymore; most people really liked that they could go buy underwear in their own neighborhood for the first time in a generation.

Anyways, my point is I'm sympathetic to the Nero argument here to some extent (he burned down parts of Rome to redevelop them), and I know Baltimore isn't DC, but it's an incredibly expensive way to do what already happens.

Starbucks with a Lulumon store and maybe a White House Black Market store. It will be back - but not what it was.

Yeah, but that was always true. Neighborhoods in cities change every generation or so, and there's not really a way to change that.

JustAnotherGen

(31,961 posts)
230. There's a small difference
Mon May 4, 2015, 08:51 AM
May 2015

The children of the last of the great migraters? If you look at my preparatory high school class - those of us who are black? I'm the only as far North as I am. With the Great Lakes being so slow to come back to life? Baltimore could have some pick ups (that friend was one in early 2009 - scooped up a great home on the cheap post the implosion) of more affluent/rich blacks moving into it. That will drive the development as it did is some part of Atlanta. I.E. the Morehouse and Spelman grads going back to Atlanta 10/15 years later with their North East and West Coast Salaries - but a much lower cost of living.


When I was looking to leave the Great Lakes in 2004/2005 - Maryland/DC was third on my list of cities. Especially for the collegiate level of education and 'affluence' - there were more opportunities for social life/dating life in that area than say - Boston.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
231. I saw Wilkerson give a talk about the re-migration (at Howard, oddly enough)
Mon May 4, 2015, 09:19 AM
May 2015
If you look at my preparatory high school class - those of us who are black? I'm the only as far North as I am.

And that's not unusual. Atlanta, Charlotte, Memphis, Dallas... a lot of children of Migrators are heading back to the Old Country.

That will drive the development as it did is some part of Atlanta. I.E. the Morehouse and Spelman grads going back to Atlanta 10/15 years later with their North East and West Coast Salaries - but a much lower cost of living.

OK, now I really want to see if I can find a recording of Wilkerson's talk somewhere... I think you'd really be interested, because it's exactly what you're getting at.

there were more opportunities for social life/dating life in that area than say - Boston.

I'm a fan of Boston, though I think I'll always call DC home (specifically a four-block stretch of Georgia Ave, which is actually 7th St at that point).

I really wish more people had run with Wilkerson's story. The Great Migration is probably the most important sociological event in US history, and it needs a lot more study before we lose the last of the people who participated in it. The impoverishment of the South, the boom of the industrial midwest, white flight, black flight (another understudied phenomenon), the creation of the national black middle class (as opposed to the regional ones of the 1930s and before), mobility of labor within the US being used as a wedge issue by management, the (eventual) opening of unions to persons of color.... there's so much absolute historical red meat there.

JustAnotherGen

(31,961 posts)
232. If you find it - post it in the AA Group
Mon May 4, 2015, 11:30 AM
May 2015

I'd love to take a peek at it.

My dad spent the last 40 years of his life in town outside of Rochester NY - and he always referred to himself as an expat!

I went as far south as Central NJ - but being in Telecom and building on my career - you really only have 3 places to live if you want to work for what we used to a call a dumb pipe.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
233. "Old Country" was a literal quote Wilkerson got from kids in Chicago
Mon May 4, 2015, 11:40 AM
May 2015

She thought they were being ironic (the kids have a way of doing that) but that was actually what they said and as she asked around it seemed people meant that.

you really only have 3 places to live if you want to work for what we used to a call a dumb pipe

Amen to that.

If I can dig it up I will post it to AA here; it was an amazing speech.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
74. I've got a bunch of questions, but I'll start with
Fri May 1, 2015, 06:00 PM
May 2015

1. That writer saying those folks were targeted for being Pakistani is a really fuckin' inflammatory thing to dangle out there without further proof or corroboration...

2. The less said about that writer's slant and innate biases (especially his closing paragraph), the better...

3. I don't know how anyone dares run a small business without Liability, Property and Workman's Comp at the minimum, and don't anybody dare say she couldn't afford it...(In case anybody was wondering, this is the *real* nut of the story here, since this shop could have been burgled, struck by lightning, had an embezzling employee, a shady accountant, accidentally burned to the ground, sued, flooded, had some dangerously substandard/negligent work done by a contractor, suffered an accidental HAZMAT spill, had a drunk driver crash through the main window, a drunk pilot crash through their roof, etc. etc...And they'd *STILL* be in the same position, riot or no riot...)

4. How the hell do people run off with an ATM and not be seen?

1939

(1,683 posts)
75. Small businesses
Fri May 1, 2015, 06:55 PM
May 2015

1. Try to carry liability insurance.

2. Have at most one or two employees and do not carry workman's comp (employees are often family members).

3. Are usually bare-assed for fire, driver crashing inot the store, robbery, theft, or riot.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
76. Well, they didn't even have liability, much less property...
Fri May 1, 2015, 07:04 PM
May 2015

and are now allegedly $100k lighter...

You can bet your ass they'll find some money for an insurance plan next time around...

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
128. Liability insurance almost always has force majeure clauses
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:53 AM
May 2015

in a high crime area, I'd bet big money their liability insurance policies have exclusions for things like riots.

I'm a rural farm/ag business and I have a force majeure clause in my liability insurance. I could pay a hundred grand/year to get that clause dropped but I can't afford that. This is a small shop in a depressed area - I'd find it bs if they DID have extensive liability insurance (or workmen's comp etc).

Liability insurance isn't all or nothing. All of them are negotiated. Live on a flood plain, your policy is going to exclude flooding for example.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
80. I'll answer
Fri May 1, 2015, 07:14 PM
May 2015

1. That's not a question

2. That's not a question

3. You have obviously never run a small business nor taken a chance nor been a poor immigrant desperate to climb up. Besides, you can have a bare bones insurance policy that still wouldn't cover what happened to them. and I'd argue the NUT of the story is that their business shouldn't have been targeted at all!

4. During looting people run off with everything from big screen teevees to toilet paper. The folks stealing the ATM were seen. Nobody's going to turn them in regardless of the size of the item.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
86. Just a goddamned minute
Fri May 1, 2015, 07:49 PM
May 2015

Sensationalist headline aside, I'm gonna want some PROOF that these folks were *specifically* targeted, aside from the speculation of one person...

So please enlighten me, small business owner: What general percentage of small business owners would you say forgo all types of insurance completely?? Because I very rarely hear the word "uninsured" in the news when they get robbed or have a fire...

And now that I think about it, why is the ATM a major loss? Isn't that like someone stealing a leased coke machine?? It's not like he owned the physical machine and was responsible for all the money inside...

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
91. You can ask that question of the NYT then. They first reported it.
Fri May 1, 2015, 08:22 PM
May 2015

lay the fuck off me. I'm not some random whipping post. If you think the NYT hasn't satisfied you sufficiently take it up them.

As for insurance, they could have had it structured any number of different ways including a force majeure clause (which would be common in a high crime rate area). I'm not privy to what they were insured for exactly or not.

My neighbor also owns the same business as I do and carries no workmen's comp or trainer liability insurance. She's a fool but she says she can't afford it. She continues to operate her business despite that so I know firsthand people who make foolish decisions all the time when it comes to insurance.

Like I said, I'm guessing you've never done it before and certainly never done it while poor, since your making assumptions all over the place.

Lastly, as far as the ATM, for me, this story isn't about the goddamn ATM which I'm guessing IS insured by the bank that owns it. That tidbit is just illustrating how open the looting was at the time and is included as part of the story.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
93. The OP title implies the shop owners somehow lost their $100,000 in the ATM
Fri May 1, 2015, 08:33 PM
May 2015

This article only records two ideas:

1) That this store was looted. Demonstrably true.

2) That the owners suspect they were targeted because they were Pakistani. Of this they have no proof. It might be true, it might not.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
94. It's the title of the article if you follow the link
Fri May 1, 2015, 08:47 PM
May 2015

I'm actually not arguing or debating the veracity of the statement that they were targeted while AA owned stores were protected fyi.

I was touched by the grieving community members over the loss of their community resources.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026588768#top

This is another part of that story imo and will have long lasting detrimental effects as we've seen in other riot torn neighborhoods like Watts, Detroit, Newark etc.

Furthermore, I'm not prioritizing the economic losses over the deaths of actual human beings and the grotesque injustices of those deaths despite others' attempts to put those words in my mouth.

Peace!

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
95. Maybe, maybe not.
Fri May 1, 2015, 08:54 PM
May 2015

The impression I'm getting is that this area is close to very gentrified areas of Baltimore. That might be the long-term outcome here, too. This is what is going on in DC right now, with the development of U Street. It might happen here, too.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
96. I hope so. The seniors of that community lobbied CVS for that pharmacy
Fri May 1, 2015, 09:03 PM
May 2015

I hope they are successful in persuading CVS to re-build but the fact remains insurance and re-building loans may be impossible to secure.

The historic precedent in other areas that have experienced similar isn't encouraging.



NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
98. "I hope they are successful in persuading CVS to re-build"...
Sat May 2, 2015, 07:48 AM
May 2015

I seriously doubt that will happen. Nobody wins in this situation.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
114. Yes, after reading the article
Sat May 2, 2015, 09:35 AM
May 2015

It's mostly speculation by the owner's niece and nephew.

No real evidence of what happened.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
103. Yeah, since she didn't have insurance, she definitely deserved this.
Sat May 2, 2015, 08:12 AM
May 2015

Please note the Your eagerness to put the blame on the store owner is appalling.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
107. Okay. I haven't read the article at the link; but ...
Sat May 2, 2015, 08:59 AM
May 2015
"What is she going to do? This isn’t her fault. Is the city going to help her? She doesn’t even have insurance," said Kanwel


The store doesn't have insurance coverage against theft ... I call BS.

JustAnotherGen

(31,961 posts)
111. That's what I'm thinking too
Sat May 2, 2015, 09:11 AM
May 2015

Would their landlord have allowed that? I would think they would need it under liability for insurance? I wonder if they were following the rules?

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
115. Besides ...
Sat May 2, 2015, 09:56 AM
May 2015

While appearing to be such a horrible thing ... the, now, atmless shop owner is (likely) NOT out of the $100,000K.

I just got off the phone with a close friend whose family owned and operated a corner store (the business was sold when his father suffered a heart attack and my friend and his brothers, all lived in different cities and had no interest in going back to working 18 hour days, for $40k/year, net). They had an atm machine in the store. I posed this scenario to him and he literally dropped the phone laughing ... His first comment was, "What? Do you think an atm machine is like a pool table or pinball machine in a bar?!?"

1) The atm was, likely, not owned by the shop keeper, the machine was placed in the store by an atm (financial services) vender and the shop keeper, gets a space rental fee (or, might not).

2) The shop keeper isn't the one stocking the atm machine with cash, the owner of the machine does.

3) No atm vender would place an atm machine in a uninsured location (for just this reason)

4) No store housed atm machine contains $100K, it might contain $20K (if it's located in a high traffic area with no banks in sight)

5) If the atm was owned by the shop keeper DID own the ATM and had it stocked with $100K, they damned sure could afford/would have had insurance.

So I guess I should say about this loss:

Cool Story non-atm having shop keeper Bro!
So


NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
121. Did you read the article?
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:37 AM
May 2015

Pretty sure the $100K figure is referring to all of the merchandise lost. The ATM undoubtedly doesn't belong to the store owner. Don't let facts get in the way of your righteous rant, though.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
135. It adds up faster than you think.
Sat May 2, 2015, 11:01 AM
May 2015

I would be willing to bet that the average convenience store has that much in merchandise.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
139. I wonder if that $100K ...
Sat May 2, 2015, 11:06 AM
May 2015

includes the mink coat, the 18 Rolex watches and the 20 carat Diamond ring missing from the storage room?

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
140. How hard would it be for you just to
Sat May 2, 2015, 11:12 AM
May 2015

express sorrow about this family's plight and move on?

Do you think blacks are the only group impacted by this?

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
149. Not hard at all. No. ...
Sat May 2, 2015, 11:48 AM
May 2015

Where do you get that I might think Black folks were the only onestatue affected?

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
151. It just seems you are doing your best to minimize
Sat May 2, 2015, 11:56 AM
May 2015

the family's loss.

Maybe I'm not understanding what you're trying to say here.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
158. From reading the OP title ...
Sat May 2, 2015, 12:29 PM
May 2015

I got this family lost an atm machine with $100k. This is a claim I disbelieve, for the reasons I have provided.

Now ... how does that translate to a belief that only Black folks were negatively affected?

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
161. No. You clearly haven't read the article. The $$ loss and the ATM are unrelated
Sat May 2, 2015, 12:59 PM
May 2015

The monetary loss is speaking to the store's contents.

The ATM comment was used to illustrate the extent of the looting.

This consistent, dishonest smear despite the facts, and your persistent refusal to read the article are a prime example of what makes DU suck.

Your posts on this reek of reverse bigotry and I'm sorry to see it.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
174. That is where a black person is ahead of a white person in line at the movie theater
Sun May 3, 2015, 11:41 AM
May 2015

and the black person wont give his or her place to the white person.

They are just being obnoxious you see, insisting on keeping that position they worked for, earned.

Not handing it over to the white person who is supposed to have everything, etc

In this scenario the black person is being bigoted to the white person

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
175. LOL ...
Sun May 3, 2015, 11:50 AM
May 2015

Or, apparently, when a Black person voices disagreement with a (presumably) non-Black person and the (presumably) non-black person thinks the Black persons position is informed by the Black person's race.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
123. The unfortunate headline implies something the article clarifies
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:45 AM
May 2015

the ATM machine was simply illustrative of the extent of the looting if you read the article.

Everything large and small was taken, "including the ATM".

It's not connected to the store and having been owned by a bank is almost certainly insured by the bank.

But keep on making silly statements or read the article and get a grip.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
131. Silly statements ...
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:58 AM
May 2015

One can tell when one's arguments start running thin ... that's when the aggression starts.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
132. #3 sounds right
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:59 AM
May 2015

My experience with such stores also is they don't own the ATM but get a cut for allowing it to be there. Also true of lottery tickets. They have to keep a separate account for those.



dionysus

(26,467 posts)
228. one thing in your post made me have to reply..
Mon May 4, 2015, 07:19 AM
May 2015

2) The shop keeper isn't the one stocking the atm machine with cash...

the indian-owned store I get 40s from, one time their ATM was out of cash, and they asked me if they wanted me to put more cash in it!

i'd never even heard of that, and the most they would have put in it was a couple hundred bucks anway, so i'm not wading into the argument of the thread here; I just wanted to point out that it happened, and it surprised the hell out of me!

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
122. A riot falls under force majeure. I'm sure they aren't covered in that case
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:40 AM
May 2015

Im not in a high crime area and my small business liability policy has a force majeure clause.

Liability insurance isn't all or nothing.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
125. I didn't know that.
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:47 AM
May 2015

That hardly seems fair - insurance companies get the premiums and then pay out nothing.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
130. I'm a small business owner with a force majeure clause in my policy.
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:56 AM
May 2015

and I'm a rural/ag business so I'm not in danger of riots but if war erupts on my street, the damage I sustain is not covered for example. Insurance policies aren't all or nothing. I happen to live this reality daily.

Actually, thank you for the laugh. Someone looks silly....



Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #130)

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
141. So 10 years on DU talking about my small biz are all a front for this moment?
Sat May 2, 2015, 11:14 AM
May 2015


Now THAT'S funny. Your desperation is hilarious.

My posting history and my hundreds of references to my horse training/organic veggie business are consistent throughout my many years here. My personal identity is also known - if you searched old DU I posted my personal story that was published in the Chicago Tribune by Dawn Turner Trice, a good friend and a prominent AA columnist.

I even posted a link to the reality genealogy teevee show that I was featured in, about the same story.

While I don't post under my real name here, I'm certainly not a mystery if anyone cared to take a moment to figure it out.

I can see you care not a whit for this community's long term prospects, and obviously anyone who suffered that isn't AA merely results in derision and disdain from you.

Pretty sad and says a whole lot more about you than anything else. Feel free to have the last word here.

JustAnotherGen

(31,961 posts)
168. My husband has on hand
Sat May 2, 2015, 02:35 PM
May 2015

At any given time between $100 K and $500 K in metals - copper being of extremely high value. He's also an immigrant upstart.

I cannot fathom not having insurance on your stock.

And he owns 7 Rolex watches that we riders on our home owners policy for.

 

lewebley3

(3,412 posts)
143. He has insurance: and Afrian American boy got his neck snapped!
Sat May 2, 2015, 11:24 AM
May 2015



The city could help make the payments of his new policy:
they boy will not get back his life!


NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
152. It is ABSURD to compare the MINIMAL property damage done when you realize
Sat May 2, 2015, 11:59 AM
May 2015

if everything was reversed the past 200 yrs, and white people were suffering this under the rule of black people, the property damage would be the last thing anybody would care about (because it would go WAY beyond minimal property damage)

I think there is enough evidence that the AfAm community is the most PATIENT and PEACEFUL imaginable, and based on the behavour of US white people the past 200 yrs, well I should not have to finish that comment.

Sudden "concern" about an ATM or CVS store is nothing but complete and total BULLSHIT hiding a different agenda

 

lewebley3

(3,412 posts)
155. Agree: ATM and CVS are insured, and can be made whole with money!
Sat May 2, 2015, 12:07 PM
May 2015



The boys life, can't be put back or made whole;
 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
156. This thread is not about them
Sat May 2, 2015, 12:12 PM
May 2015

It's about the Pakistani family that was essentially wiped out.

Maybe you could muster up a smidgen of sympathy for them...

 

lewebley3

(3,412 posts)
163. They are not wiped out: They have insurance: and the Have their lives!!
Sat May 2, 2015, 01:24 PM
May 2015


The Boy with snapped neck was wiped out for years: and lost his life
because of a bully cop!


The Pakistani family can rebuild, the boy can not rebuild he's dead.

1939

(1,683 posts)
167. Had insurance and were made whole
Sat May 2, 2015, 02:30 PM
May 2015

Just like all of those homeowners and renters in New Orleans had insurance and were made whole for their losses.

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
219. Freddie Gray was not a "boy". He was a 25 year old man.
Sun May 3, 2015, 10:27 PM
May 2015

Or are you in the habit of calling all African American men "boys"? This is an offensive post.

 

lewebley3

(3,412 posts)
235. No I actually thought he looked about 15, He just looked young!
Mon May 4, 2015, 07:45 PM
May 2015

Last edited Tue May 5, 2015, 10:45 AM - Edit history (1)



You are right, I should of thought about that, the news reports kept talking
about his mother looking for him.

I jumped to the conclusion, he was very young. (from his pictures I thought he was tall teen)

I am in the North, the word boy is not topically used to refer African American:
you are right it could be mistaken for something else. (I will be more careful)

Thanks;





Response to ForgoTheConsequence (Original post)

 

ann---

(1,933 posts)
157. I'd ask
Sat May 2, 2015, 12:12 PM
May 2015

how does this help the cause of those who protested.
Looting is theft and setting fires is arson. Here's hoping
those who committed those crimes are caught and tried.

Disgracing Freddie Gray's family like that was wrong - period.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
160. i am saying, these criminals finally got up to what middle white crime steal, and get away with.
Sat May 2, 2015, 12:32 PM
May 2015

lets just really keep that in mind.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
164. why do you do that? why do some argue in that manner? it isnt factual, it isnt a productive
Sat May 2, 2015, 01:24 PM
May 2015

way to discuss, it is lazy.

do you think i am suggesting it is ok for white middle class to steal and get away with it?

that can be the only conclusion one draws from your fabricated argument you just gave me.

it is not even logical.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
166. Really? How much does the white middle class steal?
Sat May 2, 2015, 02:00 PM
May 2015

The middle class in general - how much do we steal, Seabeyond?

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
229. Am I reading your post as you meant it?
Mon May 4, 2015, 07:21 AM
May 2015

It sounds like you are implying that white middle class is a notorious crime bloc or something. You lost me there. Did you mean to say the banksters and wealthy oligarchs, super wealthy tax-cheats, but instead inexplicably typed "middle white crime"?

RandySF

(59,457 posts)
205. Many rioters don't realize that
Sun May 3, 2015, 06:03 PM
May 2015

when they damage a business, they're not always hitting the 1%, but people making very thin margins.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
226. Riots aren't a message; that's mostly a white liberal fantasy
Mon May 4, 2015, 06:45 AM
May 2015

New Englanders looking at pumpkins aren't an oppressed minority seeking their rights. It's odd to me that so many people here make that comparison to call out people, but never follow it to its conclusion: somebody breaking in to a CVS and taking stuff is really behaving just like a college kid in New Hampshire.

This isn't rocket science. Alcohol + young males + bad police response leads to rioting in pretty predictable ways, and it's no more a "statement" than a stampede at a soccer match is.

 

ann---

(1,933 posts)
208. The
Sun May 3, 2015, 06:13 PM
May 2015

looters and stealers have disrespected the memory of Freddie Gray.
Shame on them. I hope they were arrested and charged.

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
220. Looters, loot. They don't care who owns the businesses they rob and burn.
Mon May 4, 2015, 01:04 AM
May 2015

In every one of theses recent riots, such as Ferguson for example, some of the businesses that were looted and burned to the ground were owned by AA. There are opportunists in every crowd, just like there are in every natural disaster.

I don't think that this business was targeted because the owner is Pakistani. It was targeted because they saw an opportunity and they took it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Baltimore riots: 'They ev...