General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDevelopments in the perception of Bernie Sanders
I have never been more optimistic about Sander's chances. I attending our local Art Walk here in Gainesville 2 days ago, and I heard so many people talking about him. I made small talk with a few of the people, and they were literally from all walks of life. There was a 70-something year old "traditional Republican," a 35 year old Green party member, and a few young women in the their mid-twenties that said they had never voted before but would for Sanders.
If Clinton is the nominee, I will certainly vote for her. That being said, I know with certainty that she would not be able to build a coalition of such varied groups as Bernie can, and is, building. All the people that are saying he won't raise as much money are probably correct, but that doesn't mean he can't win. Tea Party people didn't originally have the most money, but they still beat some of their entrenched Republican opponents because they energized people. Both Sanders and Clinton will do that, but I think Sanders will be able to do it better, and for more people. Greens and environmentalist, old-school Republicans (the opposite of Modern Republicans), young people and the apathetic.....Sanders is going to get a lot of people voting for Democrats that would not be voting for Clinton.
If you want to have an honest discussion about Sanders vs. Clinton, those things need to be taken into account.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)To me it is funny how Bernie supporters tell the truth and facts about Hillary in an effort to bolster their people. But not the other way around.
Neither side takes the other serious.
We all have our opinions and observations.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)That's kind of the core of a discussion board, isn't it?
Response to Scootaloo (Reply #5)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Hillary to support Bernie is not discussion.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Or are you just trying to derail this thread?
840high
(17,196 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)May come on hard. Chuck toad asked him about it
Be prepared. Bernie was talking about gender roles etc back when. I've read worse on fan fiction.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)in this country are very powerful. No one else sounds like him or says the things he is saying. People are tired of bullshit and the truth is like a long drink of fresh, cold spring water on a hot and muggy day. His message isn't tailored by focus group research,
I have no doubt that Bernie can generate mass popularity largely by word-of-mouth.
well said - I saw nothing wrong with the stated observations in the post...
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Probably used to describe Palin also
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I think there will be a good number of Dems who won't show up. Sanders will bring in a lot of voters to the polls who had given up and stopped voting, or are new voters. And I think he'll do better with x-over Rs, and Independants as well.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Clinton will energize and depress the wrong parties. The Republicans will come out in droves to "beat Clinton" even if they hate their own nominee (and trust me, they will.) On the other hand, there's a significant portion of Democrats who will simply opt to not show up - and it's not just those "evil awful leftists" who are dissatisfied with her, but also the pro-Clinton people who live in a private universe where her win is guaranteed.
Now people can argue all day about how wrong-headed it is to "protest" by skipping a vote. but it doesn't matter, people will do it anyway. And the issue isn't "how DARE you be dissatisfied?!" as many try to roll with, it's an issue of the candidate actually being dissatisfying to the voters in question.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)If you don't offer them something they will just stay home...that is the only vote they have other than the lesser of two evils...it is a vote of no confidence.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)here in 2016.
Urban Dems turn out for presidential elections, and Feingold is likely to bring dem voters off the sideline.
Walker is well known here and it's likely he'll have a place on the GOP ticket. That's going to motivate the anti-Walker voters, and the consequences of FitzWalker governance is going to be even more obvious.
I think the Dem turnout will be at least 5% larger than we saw across the Walker recall and re-election. It could be bigger that.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)That the democrats going with the "money candidate" cost the election vs. Walker. I admit i'm not familiar, do you have any take on that?
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Last edited Mon Jun 1, 2015, 07:06 AM - Edit history (1)
Urban dems have low turnout in our off-year gubernatorial elections, so it's somewhat fair to say the non-urban dems weren't impressed by the establishment candidate Burke.
Urban dems in WI also don't turn out strong for the primary. That's going to mean non-Milwaukee dems are likely going to be rather more important in the primary. That combination could make the hurdle for HRC in the primary higher.
Nonetheless, things are going to happen in 2016 that will lift dem turnout in the general.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)If she ends up the nominee...
Our home will not give money...we will not buy her stuff...and there will be no work in an office of hers or a Dem location.
We had said we would probably hold our nose and vote for her.
The last couple weeks, we are considering...not voting if it's her. It will be a gut wrenching decision but she will not be our choice.
840high
(17,196 posts)vote for her.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)ZX86
(1,428 posts)Just take California for example and the race between Jerry Brown and Meg Whitman.
Omaha Steve
(99,879 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Unlike any other Democratic Senator ever.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)state where they stand on the issues I wont rubber stamp them with my vote. Bernie Sanders is my clear front runner.
The party is not in tune with the base and is counting on the lead candidates personality and popularity to win.
Sanders is defining the platform that is appealing to many voters.
Response to ClarkJonathanKent (Original post)
SmittynMo This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)If she wins, no pressure on Wall St. reform. No pressure for tax reform. TPP is in the bag and bugger everyone else.
Maybe a new war or two or continuation of the ongoing wars in Afghan and the drones.
If she is the candidate, I will vote for her, considering the alternative.
But, same as I did for Obama, no contributions, no phone bank work. No tee shirt - I was offered a free Obama tee and turned it down. No bumper sticker.
If Bernie gets the nomination, I'm in 100% and 212 pounds behind him.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)and he seemed a lot more animated and interesting than he did on the weekend closest to his announcement to run. I thought he was rather lackluster then, good to see that he's kicked it up a notch or two.