General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe word "hero"
This word is used ad nauseum when referring to military personnel.
It's all over the radio, TV, and print media.
I'm sorry but not everyone who serves is a hero. There are good and bad people who join the service just like in everyday life.
What the hell is gong on here?
Is this some kind of "guilt complex" at work for cheering on the unnecessary Afghanistan occupation and the illegal and destructive Iraq invasion that left so many dead and injured?
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)to divert attention from what those heroes actually brought about (through no fault of their own) and to infect the 16 year-olds with enthusiasm for enlisting. We're gonna need more heroes for all the upcoming ME wars & occupations, not to mention what's planned for oil-bearing Africa. The agents of state-sanctioned killing are always ennobled like that.
GeorgeGist
(25,327 posts)real compensation costs money.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)I know nothing about the character of their service. If I get deep into a conversation, I add an apology for our misuse/abuse of our troops.
Response to SHRED (Original post)
olddots This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Probably a collective cultural reaction to the way vets and soldiers were treated in the U.S. prior to the interwar period until the mid-thirties.
I'd guess that given a choice between the two extremes, the current is a far better cry than the former.