General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrash-talking Hillary on this board makes me more likely to vote for Hillary.
I was definitely leaning Bernie. The full-on Hate-Hillary slime-spew is changing that, post by post. I'm sure there are many others like me; and frankly, if I saw a tumult of anti-Bernie posts it would probably have the opposite effect.
A poster questioned me -- a post on an anonymous message board would have such power? -- implying that I must be weak-minded, or stupid, or a hidden Bernie-hater. But the posters currently dominating this board with acidic anti-Hillary screeds are not anonymous to me; they are progressives I have seen post before, and whom I generally respect.
There's some basic psychology at work here -- I don't want to see any Democratic candidate trashed, period. The one-upsmanship, the sneering snark, the piling-on -- WTF? Some people seem to be pushing the meme that Hillary is Satan -- 'She drinks milk! She's a pawn of Big Dairy!' -- over and over and over. Someone thinks Hillary might be a pawn of the Family -- yeah, Hippie Hil's whole goal is to spread Crypto-Fascist control, she's just pretending to be liberal -- I'm sorry, but that's just Lying Fucking Bullshit.
Really, is this all just pro-Hillary Black Ops? 'Cause I was voting for Bernie. The slew of Full On Bullshit is skewing me Hillary. Fucking ridiculous behavior from otherwise intelligent progressives. Check yourself before you wreck yourself. Perhaps the excitement of having Bernie in the primaries is driving you into primal tribe-exclusion behavior or something.
If Bernie himself was acting anything like this, I'd stop listening to a single thing he said. However, he's always right, he's awesome, he's the best candidate IMO -- but I don't want to hear Slime, not from anybody, not about any Democratic Candidate, period. Everything I know about both Hillary and Barack tells me I don't agree with many things they believe in; still, I trust that they are civil servants, and have at their core a basic sense of what is best about this seemingly-cursed nation. Bernie would say the same thing.
Association games and barely-based accusations of Pawn-control are not just a logical fallacy -- they're a tactic that demeans the candidate they are purportedly intended to support.
Just saying. Bernie Sanders is a better person than some of his Number One fans are.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Face it. Bernie supporters just don't have what it takes to post OPs tying another candidate to completely unrelated racist pictures and accusations of writing rape fantasy porn.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)He didn't trot out a token black family to show he wasn't at his announcement speech. He must be homophobic too for not trotting out a gay couple like Hillary did.
I personally can't speak for black people, but I certainly can speak for gay ones. The stereotyping NEEDS TO STOP. We're not Republicans, we're f*cking Democrats. Why are we race baiting each other??
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)many hillary supporters you are a hater. I was told today that I was 'shooting my mouth off'. I wish I had the vocabulary to express how angry I still am after several hours between reading that said to me here and now. This sword cuts both ways.
Paka
(2,760 posts)I got banned from the Hillary group for saying it cuts both ways.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)It does cut both ways.
NiceTryGuy
(53 posts)...for pointing out that Ron Paul polled high in online polls, and you can't take them seriously.
Apparently, that was "trolling."
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)5. This is the same thing that happened with Ron Paul...
...the online supporters overwhelmed the Internet and made it look like Paul was a prohibitive favorite. But in reality, there weren't enough Americans willing to vote for a nutty old man speaking populism - especially after the media got ahold of him.
Look, enjoy the little flirt. Just make sure you register to vote so that we have you in line when it's time to cast your vote for the actual nominee. We're going to need everyone to fall in line and get behind the first woman president in our history. We cant have a repeat of Nader.
A Jury voted 4-3 to hide this post on Thu May 28, 2015, 07:37 AM. Reason: This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=9213
Nice try, NiceTryGuy, but some of us know how to use the search function.
Quackers
(2,256 posts)Going to the Bernie group and telling people to fall inline and vote for Hillary. Let me check............Yep, trolling.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)He's gonna need to up his game if he wants to still be here when the real fun starts.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)under dubious circumstances without linking to it..
only to have someone show up with the link and results.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I'm a big fan of your work as well.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)I am of yours as well.
Especially in the A&A group.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I served on a jury for a post in that group.....and posted the Jury Results...without any personal narrative. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=7758
Just a horrid thing that I did there. lol.
Cha
(298,087 posts)Too funny lol
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)but some people..........................
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)I'm sorry you were made to feel bad. Some here glom onto their candidate and defend them as if they were their immediate family as opposed to a politician. It's as ridiculous as it is inappropriate. I recommend fully utilizing the tools available on this website to deal with that such as trash thread, alert, ignore, etc. Cheers.
byronius
(7,413 posts)That is not the case. It does not serve you to accuse me thusly.
MelungeonWoman
(502 posts)Eight years ago I voted for Hillary!
byronius
(7,413 posts)But I'll take the best the Democratic Party has to offer.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)....maybe you should reevaluate the way you pick candidates.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)nt
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)I sure have.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)I'm not sure why you're directing this at me, I think all candidates should be critiqued until someone wraps up the nomination.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Hillary's supporters haven't been able to criticize him on the issues, so they have been going after him personally. Some of the memes have been bizarre.
Compare the two candidates on issues and criticize away.
NYC Liberal
(20,138 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)All of my critiques of her are either policy related or where she gets her campaign funding. I have trouble believing that someone that cashes Wall Street's checks on Tuesday are going to do a good job of regulating them and reining them in on Thursday.
But personally I have cut back on talking about your candidate. She already gets too much press and it is better for my blood pressure to just talk positively about what Bernie stands for.
Martin Eden
(12,887 posts)If the OP thinks some people are talking out of their ass, it's not very smart to let those people influence your vote.
yuiyoshida
(41,872 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)This is Democratic Underground, and I have loved it and leaned from it for a long, long time.
Plenty of hard facts on this board to help me pick my candidate. My point is that quasi-baseless personal assaults on Hillary posted by certain Bernie supporters serve Hillary, not Bernie.
I believe you have entirely missed my point.
quickesst
(6,283 posts)....Will continue missing your point. To me, the situation reminds me of the cartoon where the repuke, his suit overflowing with cash points to the democrat with a couple of bills hanging out of his pocket and yells, "SEE, HE TOOK MONEY TOO!!!". As for Hillary criticism vs Bernie criticism, there is no comparison.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(116,008 posts)And please note also that there's more than enough rudeness to go around. Nobody should be sliming anybody, but it always happens during primary season because people identify too closely with their chosen candidate. "You insult my candidate, you insult ME! So YOU suck, and therefore your candidate sucks because a good candidate wouldn't have assholes supporting him/her!" A few childish or overzealous fans shouldn't determine anybody's vote; unfortunately we always notice the bad behavior of some and don't notice so much the rational, polite behavior of the majority.
byronius
(7,413 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)Bernie's interviews with Randi Rhodes sold me on Bernie. Not hating Hillary is not the same as not being a Bernie supporter. I don't get the intense vitriol for Clinton. Perhaps I'm not pure enough?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)She became a left wing caricature of Ann Coulter.
That was back in 08 I believe. Never listened to her after that and he career took a nose dive after the election. She basically self immolated over Hillary.
byronius
(7,413 posts)And she did engage in invective.
Point taken.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And Ed Schultz and many others.
Randi was the worst though.
neverforget
(9,437 posts)Hillary, Bernie or O'Malley? You're going to decide to support a Presidential contender because some people on the internet are mean?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)What's with these faux "I like Bernie but" posts?
Just another hypocrite looking for a reason to attack DUers who don't support Hillary.
PAY ATTENTION TO MEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!
Puglover
(16,380 posts)We would all howl when Al would say, "Well, I never say anything bad about anyone but........"
It is so transparent.
byronius
(7,413 posts)Dripping with meanness. Really, I'm some sort of Hillary-spy?
Polarization doesn't serve Bernie, it serves Hillary. And maybe some of your wicked inner demons.
It's not transparent at all. You are dead wrong, and proving my point. Turning Bernie's candidacy into a purity test is STUPID. He needs a big tent.
Do you not want him to win? Do you think making dickish comments and excluding people is the key to his success?
He doesn't. Hillary has numbers; Bernie has to attract people away from her. Being vile and mean is not the tactic here, Puglover.
Unless you're up to something else. You know, this post has revealed much to me -- many Bernie supporters are thoughtful and intelligent, and many are complete assholes. Not that it should matter to me; but it does, and to other moderates leaning Bernie.
You're hurting his cause, not helping.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)"Vile and mean." Just telling an old work story that I thought fit here. Seems to have given you a sad. Sorry bout that.
"Unless you're up to something else." LOL did you not just say with some umbrage...."Really I'm some sort of Hillary-spy?" Pot kettle.
"You know this post has revealed much to me." Thank you?
You give me far too much credit.
byronius
(7,413 posts)Your post has revealed that I'm right, and yes, I infer Rat-Fuckery when Bernie clearly does not intend to vilify Hillary unlike some of his supporters here -- these flames and snark do not serve him.
And you inferring that I'm some sort of liar, that I'm manipulating for Hillary's profit -- yes, it makes me sad. You're wrong. You're absolutely so fucking wrong.
I don't think you're sorry at all. And Bernie deserves better.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)I didn't say a word about Hillary. What my comment was directed towards is the passive aggressive disingenuous nature of your OP. And I stand by that as MANY others have in this thread.
Now, do a search Byronius. Find 1, ONE post that I have made trashing Hillary Clinton. I'll wait.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I didn't know that poster from jack until this op, now I'll always associate them with it.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)I guess they didn't like my little work story.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I hope you're happy with yourself.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)You called me a 'faux fundy' indirectly on my own thread, as if I'm not even a real person, just a faceless evildoer of some kind. Now you insist that I'm dishonorable. I haven't suggested that you have personally trashed Hillary. What?
Truly, all of this sucks. At least you're responding somewhat, I suppose.
All right, I give up. Gib's Auf, as Kafka said. You all win, so very much.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 2, 2015, 05:45 PM - Edit history (1)
Do you really expect us to believe that you were trying to start an honest dialog?
If you wanted people to take you seriously you should have checked yourself before you wrecked yourself.
But keep insulting the people who responded to your insults with more insults.
You're really helping dude.
byronius
(7,413 posts)You win. You're the best.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Dude, reread your own op, if you're getting flack there's the reason.
It's not even about Bernie, this is the same result you'd get if you insulted any group of people on DU - pit bull owners, people who had their sons circumcised, smokers, Olive Garden patrons, Walmart shoppers...
Seriously, you've been here long enough to know better.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Posts flame bait and now complains that they're getting roundly flamed in return.
byronius
(7,413 posts)And I've been roundly put in my place.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Calling for civil discourse -- ur doin it wrong.
byronius
(7,413 posts)Major fail.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Pretty lame. I know who I support and believe in and no way is any internet forum going to change my commitment or loyalty.
byronius
(7,413 posts)This is the Democratic Underground. It counts. It means something to me. I learn. I grow. It has changed me in many ways. I respect it, even if you don't.
My point was that Bernie is clearly choosing not to go negative; he and Hillary are friends. Vitriolic assignations of dire intent on her part based on logical assumptions I do not buy are not 'policy' debates. Bernie would not support these allegations; he sticks to the facts. Going negative would be mistake for him, he knows it. All this Hillary-hatred serves Hillary, that is my point.
You know, a lot of knee-jerk bile being spewed at me for this post. I love Bernie, I just don't hate Hillary, and so I must be vilified. Makes me wonder what the baser motivations of my fellow Bernie-supporters are -- it all smacks of primal tribe-exclusion.
I'll probably vote for Bernie anyway, because I choose to. But Hillary-hatred is a thing that will doom his campaign if it gets meme-legs. Mock me if you want, but this is Politics 101. I want him to win, but there is a perverse psychological effect at work here -- I am repelled by mean-mouthed holier-than-thous, and they seem to be swarming lately, all on the 'side of Bernie'.
I don't think you understood the point of my post at all. Maybe read it again.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I too enjoy reading everything via the mechanism of literalism rather than grasping an obvious point...
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)With supporters like you, Bernie's got the smack-talkers vote sewn up. Great job.
Purity tests backed up with snark and troll-accusations -- yeah, winning strategy.
Bernie would tell you to stop it. 'Cause he's actually got a real head on his shoulders. Talks to people. Reaches out. Tries.
You? Not so much. I read small and mean.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)"I was leaning toward the Dem, but you guys were trash-talking Jeb, so now I'm gonna vote for Jeb! Nanny nanny boo boo!"
byronius
(7,413 posts)Mean. Mean mean mean mean mean. And a dull-witted political strategy.
Bernie's a better person than you, dude, that's why I'll vote for him even though most of his supporters on this board appear to be five years old.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Your behaviour is every bit as childish as anything else I've seen here.
The only difference is you seem to think you're above the fray.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)"OMG, the Bernie supporters are sooooooo mean. They make me want vote for Hillary, even though I was leaning toward Bernie."
What crap. You never were leaning toward Bernie. If you were actually interested in Bernie's message, you would listen to what he is saying, rather than what anonymous posters on a partisan Internet message board are saying.
I certainly don't vote for someone based on what anonymous posters on an Internet discussion board say. I vote for someone based on how close they reflect my own beliefs and desires. Your story sounds contrived and deserves the derision that it gets.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... can control your thinking and behavior?
Doesn't seem very rational to me, but if that's how you roll, do what ya gotta do.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)It is both sides.
Me, back to news story writing (and transcription)
Response to byronius (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
byronius
(7,413 posts)I make the point to attempt some call for civil discourse, ESPECIALLY from Bernie supporters, from whom I expected better. Bernie knows that this kind of divisive rhetoric will polarize and insure Hillary's victory, and this forum is an important microcosm of what's going to happen nationwide.
Bernie would tell the commenters on this thread to back off and behave. Purity tests and paranoia are not the path. Ascribing devious motives and hurtful intent to someone pointing out that flame-wars serve no one but Scott Walker is a major FAIL. I am up to nothing but asking for civil discourse, ESPECIALLY from the best candidate, who may yet draw enough moderates to win this thing -- unless his 'supporters' turn on them, which they have in this thread.
The dialogue matters. This board matters. Human perception matters. To say otherwise is blithering idiocy.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Sorry that you missed over two years of hostility, spite, threats, rage, and bile spewed at any poster on this board who identifies as left, or ever dared to say "I'd rather have a different candidate than Clinton." Forgive us if we're a bit snappish, when day after day we see accusations that a candidate we support is hysterical racist gun nut who is unelectable because he's Jewish and doesn't have his lips wrapped around some semi-floppy Koch. We might be a little on edge due to the constant harassment by sock puppets, trolls and repeatedly-banned morons who throw that stupid libertarian recruitment Square at us. Of course after seeing people who hoped for Warren to run being labeled "rapists," after watching people who don't want weddigns to be blown up by robots labeled "haters," and after seeing fake supporters of women and POC happily cheer those peoples' deaths so long as a certain candidate can claim some responsibility for it, we might be just a little edgy.
I am sorry that we do not meet your standards for supporters of a candidate you would support. i am certain you will find that the clinton supporters meet your expectations of saintliness, however. Happy days to you, sir.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Just perfect Scoot!.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)I'm most likely to vote for the candidate who most closely represents my views, regardless of what other people say about him/her.
peecoolyour
(336 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)-none
(1,884 posts)"of all the quality candidates running." Those of us paying attention know how many that amounts too.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The ones associating him with racism and rape fantasies were vomit inducing enough to remind me of 2008.
You seem to be very selective with your outrage and condemnation.
Why is that?
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Recs for Hillary. No recs for Bernie. He should have, as he said "Checked himself... before he wrecked himself"
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I don't know what's worse, the hypocrisy or the insult to our intelligence.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)You know, I didn't see the anti-Bernie posts that have apparently sent this place over the fucking edge. I rec positive news for any Democratic candidate, and I'll likely vote for Bernie no matter what. Attempting to divine my politics by my recommends is foolish and small-minded, and I can tell you that you are wrong.
I stopped recommending for Bernie and started recommending for Hillary when I began to see posts suggesting that Hillary is the servant of Satan. My post was an attempt to point out the critical psychology behind this admittedly non-logical tendency of mine -- Bernie has said emphatically that he's not going to run a negative campaign against Hillary, that they are in fact friends.
Gotta say, you hurt my feelings pretty bad there. Was that your intent? You succeeded. Great job. So wise and thoughtful.
Nobody gets by your purity test, apparently. You're just too smart.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)The administrators set it up that way. You have recommended a few actually 4 Bernie posts since I looked and replied to your OP yesterday so here's a from me on that.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Ignorance is not an excuse, you chose to insult and lecture one group of supporters and now you're complaining about the backlash.
What were we supposed to think?
That you were trying to encourage civility?
You wrecked yourself, don't blame everyone else.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)And I WAS gonna vote for Bernie. And I WILL if he gets the nomination.
Whoever gets the nomination gets my vote.
Team Hillary and team Bernie on DU are both guilty of smearing Democratic candidates. The election's a year and a half away and much can change in that time.
The pukes have been attacking Hillary for YEARS and now they're attacking Bernie. Personally I think they do enough smearing for everyone, and you know they watch what goes on here (when their operatives aren't trolling).
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)You are immediately attacked by Bernie fans.
Sorry friend. Just ride it out till the primaries. That will separate the BS from the reality.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Frankly I don't see attacking very much... A lot of disbelief though... Some chuckling and a bit of amazement. But no attacking. Sorry.
frylock
(34,825 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Bernie Sanders. Condemned by a packed jury of Bernie supporters.
Maybe u get lucky and one person is a Hillary or OMalley supporter and gives u a break but it's not enough to save you so you get a hide.
Then you get a few of those and poof you just dissappear and all is well again in the Bernie Underground.
I can't wait for the primaries!
frylock
(34,825 posts)murielm99
(30,787 posts)I have served on a lot of juries lately. I guess there are just more alerts at this time. The Bernie supporters seem to be judging alerted posts based on their partisan feelings more than on the content of the posts. This place is worse than I have seen it in any of the other primaries. People need to grow up.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)by some of Hillary's Number One fans? This cute little bouncy has been done already. We all know who is and has been supporting who. All anyone has to do is look on your profile. Your Rec's to be specific, it's all there who you support dude. Next time go through and un rec all the Hillary OPs and you might want to rec a few OPs about Bernie to go along with all the ones on Hillary you have recommended, just to make your bouncy a little bit more believable. Nice try. There's an old saying. Don't piss in my ear and tell me it's raining. I can tell the difference.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Smack dab in the middle once again.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Response to Autumn (Reply #62)
Post removed
Autumn
(45,120 posts)I voted on the alerts I have weighed in on today?
Bad form, as usual.
So what about this one? No opinion, I suppose.
Yuck...
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Yep. Yuck...
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 3, 2015, 01:32 PM - Edit history (2)
It is what it is.
eta: there was a cowardly alert based on complete lie which resulted in a hidden post above.
Some people have a real problem when the truth is revealed. This "host's" behavior in this thread and many others shows that she has absolutely no business sitting it judgement of DU'ers...none. It's bad form, and I'll continue to call it out when it happens.
And violet, lol... stalking my ass. Your lying alert was one of the most blatent abuses as I've ever seen here. I haven't had word one with any host, I assumed that this thread had an SOP alert up, and apparently I was right. Coming from the cheif host of the troll protection program, I have to laugh at your attempt at righteous indignation here. Please do alert this one too, as I'm sure you rolled the dice with each of my posts in this thread.
What a pair of backbiting
phonies.
Cha
(298,087 posts)the candidate they support is like that.
Like the OP said.. "If Bernie himself was acting anything like this, I'd stop listening to a single thing he said."
Sorry, you got a bad hide, Bobbie Jo.
Violet_Crumble
(35,992 posts)Seeing yr so interested in the host forum and what Autumn does in there, Autumn abstained from voting. Many hosts do that if they've participated in the thread that's alerted on. If you think that's bad form, tough shit. If yr wanting so badly to talk about what goes on in the hosts forum how about you volunteer to be a host and see for yrself? What you'll find may not be to yr liking because the hosts who participate are all professional and even though I know from reading some of these threads some of them are partisan about this or that candidate, they all act objectively in the hosts forum and leave their partisanship at the door.
Having said that, if a host who participates in that forum is gossiping with you about other hosts and hosting issues, knowing that you pop up in threads having a go at hosts, I'll lose a fair bit of respect for them....
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Gossiping.
Well that's the whole fucking point. Honestly, I've seen both of you in action on this front, and it's anything but "professional."
I have an opinion and I gave it. You don't like it, tough shit.
Violet_Crumble
(35,992 posts)Unless yr just making up knowing what happens in the hosts forum, which wouldn't surprise me. Yr carrying on about bad form? Like I said, many hosts abstain from voting on an alerted OP if they've already posted in the thread, and there's no bad form at all about it. Want to go all super duper fussy about anything else host related?
So, instead of slagging off hosts like you do, why don't you sign up to be one? That way you'll find out that all of us who are active hosts do act objectively and fairly. If you have any complaints or questions, which I suspect you don't, you can always go to Skinner about it. He's over in ATA...
And you got an opinion from someone who's actually in the hosts forum and sees what goes on, as opposed to yr opinion which is based on nothing but some weird dislike thing you've got going. That's the thing when you have opinions. Others who do know what goes on also have opinions and get to express them...
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)I WAS one, Violet. Of course I haven't been a perpetual host all this time, but I've been there done that. Saw it all first hand, and when there was ever any questionable behavior, there always seemed to be a common denominator.
I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that I'm somehow communicating with another host, but I find it interesting that the two of you would jump to that conclusion.
IMO...when "hosts" REPEATEDLY find themselves in the middle of nasty shitstorms, (or instigating such) it's bad form. Period. There is a pattern with this one, I've seen it more than a few times over, and I said so right here. I will continue to say so right here if I want to, and if YOU don't like it take it to Skinner your damn self.
Violet_Crumble
(35,992 posts)Which you obviously know nothing of. That 'common denominator' thing you claim to have seen isn't true either. In my times hosting I've only ever seen three hosts abuse their position and Skinner booted two of them from hosting and nuked the other*. So the only common denominator is that if a host abuses the system Skinner gets rid of them.
Here's a suggestion if you don't want people to get the idea that yr communicating with another host (btw, there's nothing wrong if you are, but then using it against another host would be really bad form). Don't jump into threads carrying on at a DUer you don't like who is a host about how they handled the alert on the thread they're posting in. I'm not sure why you even brought that up. It was just kind of weird and very random.
Well, I don't recall saying you couldn't say what you want. I just made a suggestion that someone who had genuine concerns or questions would have taken. You can continue to say whatever you want to and I'll be right here to tell you yr wrong and explain why yr wrong. It's pretty awesome how that works
on edit: Actually two have been nuked, not just one...
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)I will call them as I see them, yr "suggestions" not withstanding.
Knock yourself out. It is what it is...
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Mail Message
On Mon Jun 1, 2015, 08:11 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
You think so huh? Do you have a problem with the "slime-spew" directed at Bernie
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6764832
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Nasty meta attack. I doubt that this will get a hide, but this kind of passive aggressive belligerence brings this place down further by the day. Just tired of the snotty behavior. FWIW
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Jun 1, 2015, 08:21 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Funny about the alerter⦠not thinking what was just alerted would get hide. yet, tired of snotty behavior. So, move on, for crying out loud.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Totally agree with alerter. Sick of the snark and the intimidation and totally agree about the passive-aggressive lowbrow behavior from this poster and her gang. Ugh.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No violation of the TOS.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I think the alerter is fishing here. Not playing.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This response mirrors the tone of the post to which it is responding. If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)oneshooter
(8,614 posts)On Mon Jun 1, 2015, 08:11 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
You think so huh? Do you have a problem with the "slime-spew" directed at Bernie
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6764832
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Nasty meta attack. I doubt that this will get a hide, but this kind of passive aggressive belligerence brings this place down further by the day. Just tired of the snotty behavior. FWIW
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Jun 1, 2015, 08:21 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Funny about the alerter⦠not thinking what was just alerted would get hide. yet, tired of snotty behavior. So, move on, for crying out loud.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Totally agree with alerter. Sick of the snark and the intimidation and totally agree about the passive-aggressive lowbrow behavior from this poster and her gang. Ugh.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No violation of the TOS.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I think the alerter is fishing here. Not playing.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This response mirrors the tone of the post to which it is responding. If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)Not from Bernie supporters, anyway. HRC is certainly getting her share from Republicans.
Is it possible that you are equating discussing her record and her position on issues with "sliming" her?
Systematic Chaos
(8,601 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)None other than Saint Rand. But that is the GOP's stock in trade, dissing Democrats in every concievable manner. Give it no heed, just because they own the media, they don't own the country, or the votes.
And I agree about trashing the Democratic Party non-stop, if a person is that disgusted, they've already left for what they see as greener pastures. Their opinion on what they left is irrevelant.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)When people get behind a candidate, they sometimes get a little too excited. If anybody says anything negative about their candidate, they get very defensive, sometimes firing back with really inappropriate stuff. All the candidates have problems, but Democrats should be careful to point out these problems in a way that doesn't feed into the Republican BS machine. If you want to criticize Clinton's handling of the Benghazi incident, you could say, "Hillary Clinton had trouble managing information during the Benghazi crisis." Or you could say, "Hillary Clinton lied about people as they were dying." Disregarding the fact that one statement is probably untrue, which one would you attribute to a sane, rational person who is control of his or her emotions? If you want to think of it another way, which statement would be more likely to come from a Republican nut job? We need to think about such things when we feel like firing a volley at the opponent.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)She neither lied or handled it poorly...FOX Noise will tell you otherwise, but no sane person would.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)It's a matter of opinion. You don't have to look very far to find people who believe Clinton should have done a better job verifying information before releasing it. I happen to think she did a reasonable job, considering the circumstances, but I would not question a person's sanity for merely suggesting the State Department could have done a better job analyzing and describing the situation.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)well all on their lonesome. Isn't it better for each camp to have no holds barred attacks on each other in order to find out who will be best to fight in the GE?
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)As they link to sources that have been debunked...fortunately DU does not reflect the real world, although they'll never believe you.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)chillfactor
(7,593 posts)I think Bernie Sanders would be appalled at what some of the Bernie's supporters post on this board..discussing issues is one thing but just plain trashy posts about Hillary is a whole different ball game...I do not think trash posters have enough common sense to realize what they are doing...the more trash I see about Hillary...the more I lean toward Bernie...and just maybe that is a good thing...
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Are making me look at other options. They are so dismissive and nasty. If that's her "base," you have to wonder if you want to be part of it.
TheKentuckian
(25,035 posts)About as believable if I could stop laughing long enough to type about how I was going to vote for Hillary but I'm worried she'll miss too much time with her grandbaby or some such tale.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)And telling the truth isn't trashing talking. She is a corporate pawn.
hatrack
(59,606 posts)When I decide who to vote for, I always find out which tiny subset of a given candidate's supporters seem (to me) to be behaving in the most irritating manner, then choose that candidate's opposite number.
It works every time!
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I am a Bernie Sanders supporter.
I am opposed to Hillary as our candidate.
Why? I have a number of reasons. Some have to do with her personality, that is how she presents and comes across as a candidate. I don't think she is effective in many respects.
But setting that aside, because I can understand that sounds personal, here is one of the things that I and Elizabeth Warren criticize in her voting record: She voted for the 2005 revision of the Bankruptcy Law that affects individuals. One of the changes that law made was to make it so that virtually all, not just the federal government, but virtually all student debt cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.
That means that when students and their parents take on student debt and then can't make the payments, they can't go to a bankruptcy court and obtain forgiveness for their debt. They are indebted and only in certain unusual circumstances can obtain a release from their indebtedness.
Now, Donald Trump or any other businessman can form a corporation, run up the bills, or even buy an existing corporation and empty its bank accounts and then rush off to bankruptcy court and get some kind of relief perhaps total forgiveness for that debt.
Elizabeth Warren did not want that change in the Bankruptcy Law. Why did Hillary Clinton vote for it? It is extremely unfair to young people from families that cannot pay for their education out of pocket.
That's just one example of the poor judgment of Hillary Clinton, of her demonstration of more concern for the banks (who were at that time the primary lenders of the non-government student loans) than for graduates from our universities and colleges.
That's just one example of her many "mistakes," mistakes derived from skewed values.
I have one thing to say about that Bankruptcy revision. John Edwards, the man who told us about the Two Americas and who cared about economic justice more than any candidate prior to Sanders, also voted for it. Why they fell for the Republican pressure to pass it I do not know. But it was a huge mistake.
Those of us who criticize Hillary are not just being mean. It is about her judgment, the many mistakes she made in her relatively short career and questions about her ultimate electability -- that is whether her personality will really get her elected once voters meet her.
blue neen
(12,336 posts)It explains why you do not support Hillary's candidacy in a civil way. You explained an important difference on policy between the candidates, which is important to those many, many of us who are undecided.
I can understand the OP's point. There is a lot of trash talk going on, from both sides. It seems like more from the Bernie supporters (that's just my perception), and it is definitely mean. What you posted was not, and I really appreciate the information you provided.
Kudos.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The fact that the op ignored a reasonable response to their flamebait and came back at you with this tells me everything I need to know about them.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)What specifically do you mean by "trash talk"?
Please give some examples.
byronius
(7,413 posts)You buy into the conclusions that Hillary is a member of the Family? That she's a secret supporter of Keystone? That she's a wealthy Kochbot? That's all fact for you, no flinching, no sarcasm?
If so, then there is no definition of 'trash-talk' we'll agree on.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)She has not said that she opposes the Keystone pipeline. If she did oppose it, I expect her to tell us her point of view.
She is wealthy. I don't think she is a Kochbot.
I don't think Benghazi was her fault although I do wonder why our ambassador was meeting with the ambassador from Turkey in Benghazi rather than in Tripoli. the
My grounds for opposing Hillary as a candidate are her personality as a candidate (not as a person) and her failure to show good judgment in past decisions in Congress as well as the fact that if she counts her time in the Clinton White House as experience, then in my view she has to take responsibility for the many errors that Bill Clinton made during those years including the repeal of Glass-Steagall, changes to welfare, the reappointment of Greenspan to the Fed, the Telecommunications Act which has resulted in a few companies owning great shares of our communications sector, the Defense of Marriage Act and many other terrible pieces of legislation that Bill Clinton signed.
Could you please define "trash-talk."
byronius
(7,413 posts)Saying 'they started it' doesn't validate the bile on this thread.
Have you considered that paid trolls are fanning the flames on both sides for the purpose of damaging either candidate in the general? I have considered it, and I think there's some evidence for it.
I'm glad you don't think Hillary is a member of the Family, but others with Bernie as their avatar do, and are pushing that meme. It hurts Bernie, just like litmus-testing for moderacy. I love Bernie, but unless I hate Hillary, I going to get flamed for it and accused of being a Hillary-bot, which I ain't, buddy, I just ain't.
This is what it is, I've seen it before, I'll see it again, but I hate to see it defining Bernie on this board.
pnwmom
(109,025 posts)Me, neither. And it's starting to have the same effect on me.
She's not the perfect candidate, but every time I defend her from an unfair attack, I remember what I do like about her.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Clearly we must learn from your example.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)to make a point to fools.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)to claim to be a former Sanders supporter and attempt to make a point by being incredibly shallow.
Shockingly, it did not work as they hoped.
And unsurprisingly, you are now here calling people names. That totally proves the OP's point how only the Sanders supporters call people names.
byronius
(7,413 posts)Except you are so COMPLETELY WRONG. Great job! Awesome show!
So smart. You are so smart.
I bet I know more about Bernie Sanders than you do. And I love him dearly.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)But please, keep insisting you really, truly love him but because a few people on the Internet you have to abandon him.
Also, please keep blithely ignoring all posts from Clinton supporters. They were totally right that Sanders doesn't care about POC, and they're totally right when they keep attacking him for the positions you claim to love.
It's a completely believable giant pile of bullshit.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)71. The OP tried to make a point but it is useless
to make a point to fools
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)The riches we enjoy are almost embarrassing.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)How about a couple of laughing smilies?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)They are often substitute for thought.
U4ikLefty
(4,012 posts)Substitute for thought indeed.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Nobody on any message board will make up my mind for me.
Im undecided. I'll figure out my candidate eventually.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)all these HRC trash talker must not be real Bennie supporters since Bennie has asked his supporters not to Trash HRC! covert operation?
Politicub
(12,165 posts)If disruptors are posing as crazed Bernie fans to turn people off to voting for Bernie, they are succeeding.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)worse if you point it out. Who would think
Progressives could be so delusional and mean.
It will last until he is out of the race which will take about until the end of the year.
I thought 2008 was sick but so far this year is worse.
No one is afraid of Bernie not the Repubs not Hillary not anybody.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Seriously, people, do you not understand how the internet *works*? Allowing anonymous posters on a message board to hold that much sway over your vote is pitiful. I'd be embarrassed.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)All of them.
MADem
(135,425 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Still undecided.
But I've decided what I think about DUers of any stripe who can't stop acting childish and freeperish.
Just sayin
MADem
(135,425 posts)I like Clinton and Sanders. I support HTC in the primary, but any Democrat is always better than any Republican...always.
The Democratic nominee gets my vote in the general!
I think we have a lot of people now visiting this board who don't really like any of the candidates running for the Dem nom. That's what is causing most of the hate and discontent.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Stupid iPhone thing.
It was a general response to all of those negative peeps.
Again, not directed at you.
MADem
(135,425 posts)We're good!!
I'm a fumble thumb all the time on my phone.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Sometimes if I don't proofread I say some idiotic things!!!
byronius
(7,413 posts)It's as if Bernie Sanders is being hijacked by rage-driven dickheads, pardon my language.
I do not think he would agree with any of this crap. I suspect if he posted anonymously here, he'd be shredded for his moderacy.
I haven't really solidified an opinion; I just want the screaming freakouts to stop. Jeez.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)I really don't give a damn what anyone else thinks. And I sure don't let it sway my vote.
byronius
(7,413 posts)I think it's an important group of people. I learn a great deal here. I listen. It changes me.
I've been a Bernie Sanders supporter since he started doing regular interviews with Randi Rhodes. He's obviously a great candidate. I think he could win; he seems to appeal to older cloth-coat conservatives who appreciate plain speech.
But read the comments on this thread. Pure bile. And maybe it is just from Sanders supporters who are full of bile, and not from a larger group of Sanders supporters like myself who don't hate Hillary.
Whenever I see progressive 'cleansing' I immediately suspect right-wing trolls or people working out deeper life issues with politics. It makes me hang my head, because an incoherent, splintered left leads to fucking awful things. I'm certain someone will immediately respond with 'a corporate left leads to fucking awful things', and that is true to my ears -- but if the only True Left is a tiny cadre of bitter, venomous banishers then I get stuck with the corporate Left, because that's all that's left.
I lived through Nixon. I lived through Reagan. I remember being mocked at a party in 2000 for wearing a Gore t-shirt by Green Naderites who insisted that GW Bush was exactly the same as Al Gore.
There are some who will still insist such a thing. It is an unhistorical opinion, however. Al Gore was a better person and would have been a better leader, and that's not so much conjecture as common sense backed with a lot of numbers.
Watching it happen all over again this season -- the vitriol thrown back and forth, the scorn, the absoluteness of it all, the permanent scars, as if we are not brothers and sisters at all, but scheming strangers -- it's disheartening. I'll probably take a break for awhile, but I wanted to express an opinion. The comments validate my conclusions succinctly.
MuseRider
(34,140 posts)and that makes only slightly less sense than what you have just said.
You have been here long enough to know it is going to be this way.
Ignore the stupid. It is aggravating as hell and too stupid to even defend. Some of the stuff I have seen the last few days has blown my mind. I did not think we would top all the last elections before we even had a full slate of candidates. Record time, way to go DU!
Trash the threads, ignore people, whatever you have to do to be able to learn enough to make your comfortable decision but please do not vote depending on whose supporters pissed you off the most.
You didn't really mean this did you?
byronius
(7,413 posts)DU sucks right now, and I think I'd better step away. Thought I'd put in my two cents. Bernie deserves better.
MuseRider
(34,140 posts)We all deserve better than what is going on around here.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)We haven't even watched a debate yet... It's only going to get worse.
byronius
(7,413 posts)Vitriol repels. And Bernie needs to draw support much more than Hillary, who already has the numbers. There's no benefit to the invective, and I smell Rat-Fucking, frankly.
delrem
(9,688 posts)ho hum.
I think they must clone them somewhere.
byronius
(7,413 posts)I won't question your Bernie credentials.
byronius
(7,413 posts)Live long and prosper, delrem.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Quite the low bar.
byronius
(7,413 posts)I got picked on by a few really snarky Naderites in 2000 that insisted Gore was Bush, if not worse. And you may not agree, but I think they turned out to be disastrously incorrect.
And yeah, if Bernie supporters who don't hate Hillary are going to get flamed on by Bernie supporters who do, then I'm going to say something about it, because none of this serves Bernie.
It serves Hillary. It is needlessly polarizing. Bernie will lose that fight. That is my point.
Am I not allowed to say how things make me feel? Apparently not. Cast out, I must be, for I am a False Bernie supporter -- just look upthread.
Some people wallow in this acidic muck and think it's high ground. I think it sucks for humanity.
SNARK. Fucking SNARK. Nothing but fucking SNARK. What the fuck is driving your hateful tone, brother? I don't hate Hillary as much as you do.
Cast me out. Fine. Great dialogue. How fucking thirteenth century, not 'progressive'.
And not worthy of supporters of Bernie Sanders.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 2, 2015, 12:48 AM - Edit history (1)
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)technically we all simply exist as a set of probability states that create a discrete reality only when measured - say, by using a ballot box
byronius
(7,413 posts)That recent discovery is extremely weird and amazing.
TM99
(8,352 posts)If you are sincere, I believe this is what you are observe.
A very vocal minority of Clinton supports take every opportunity to attack Sanders and his supporters. They have from day one. Hell, these are the same asshats that call liberals 'far left', 'libtards', 'unicorn lovers'. etc. etc. etc. They post gossip, lies, distortions, accuse POC who support Sanders of being racist, etc. etc. etc.
One such example this evening is another post inferring Sanders wrote 'rape fantasies' in the early 1970's.
I hate that shit. I call it out. I push back against that and those people. Don't confuse me calling out a few wankers who just happen to be Clinton supporters with trash talking Clinton when I am giving legitimate opinions and facts about her stated policies, positions, etc.
byronius
(7,413 posts)The man's a great American. Still, the posts I've seen from some 'Bernie Supporters' haven't been rational at all. A lot of mean-mouthed hatred, invective, cruel words, bitter divisiveness and blanket condemnations of the Democratic Party as a whole -- and I have to wonder how any of that serves Bernie, whom I truly love.
TM99
(8,352 posts)They are here daily.
I will condemn the Democratic party outright. They lost their way when the Third Way New Dems took the reigns in the 1990's. Their policies are not traditional Democratic party ones and while they are the minority they dominate the DNC today.
So give me some example posts of this mean-mouthed hatred, invective, cruel words, and bitter derisiveness.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)When did that happen?
Logical
(22,457 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)Your snark in my face feels so -- mean-mouthed and small. Thanks!! You're a great Bernie Supporter (not).
Use your words, maybe? Or too much Reality Television -- sound bites!! They work!
You should maybe actually read the post before acting like a douche.
Logical
(22,457 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)Wait, I have a degree in Theater. Oops.
Can't wait until our souls are washing around in the vast Main Spirit, and we run across parts of each other and you realize that you could have said something so much more useful and apologize for your mean brevity, the result of personality formations I know nothing about, and then I apologize as well and we lose all coherence and mix to be reincarnated as a bipolar fourteenth century dictator.
Sorry, 'drama' again. I just read too much, you know? I like words, not bits. I like people, not 'the hand'.
I'm talking to your hand.
It's very sad. Your hand is sad. What has your hand been doing?
Aieee, 'drama'. It's like a disease.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Elevate the Democratic candidate of your choice and do not denigrate the Democratic choice of others.
Sounds like a plan.
byronius
(7,413 posts)Thanks.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Instead of subtly slandering me from the anonymity of an internet connection why don't you cite all the instances where I have denigrated fellow Democratic candidates.
I doubt the list is long.
In the alternative I request that you withdraw the calumny you made against me from the anonymity of an internet connection.
Thank you in advance.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)You slandered me from the anonymity of an internet connection and you have the unmitigated gall to play the victim, wow!
Ecclesiastes 7:1
Where do I go to get my reputation back?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Which is not at all surprising. Keep going with "these allegations are unsubstantiated!!". It works so well.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)You spread calumnies about me from the anonymity of an internet connection, you are called out about the calumnies you are spreading about me from the anonymity of an internet connection, and instead of providing evidence to support your calumnies which is in and of itself a contradiction you spread more calumnies.
Priceles...
Let's dispense with the high fallutin language. You implied I talk shit about other Democratic candidates...I have some 54,000 posts. There should be a ton of them.
You have autosearch so please cite them.
I probably have slipped...If somebody talks shit about someone I like I am going to talk shit about someone they like but those instances are rare. I'm not perfect. The last guy that was perfect or held himself out to be was nailed to a cross...
But 54,000 posts..., even if I slipped up 1% of the time that's 540 posts.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Good to know. I'll be sure to not take your political opinions seriously in the future.
Good luck with Hillary
byronius
(7,413 posts)And the verification of my contention in the comments section.
I'll be voting for Bernie, but not because you're a snark-filled quick-draw. In spite of it.
None of this serves Bernie. Do you not see that? Do you not get the point?
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)This is a message board with maybe 1000 active posters. It makes fuck all difference what we say on this forum with respect to any vote anywhere.
So what was the point of the OP? You want internet cred from Hillary supporters or what?
byronius
(7,413 posts)It's been made clear to me on this thread that unless I hate Hillary, I am a Hillary troll. I believe that kind of divide and condemn crap hurts Bernie's cause, and that he would be the first to say so.
"So what was the point of the OP? You want internet cred from Hillary supporters or what?"
I want Bernie's supporters on DU to reflect the utterly reasonable and competent nature of the man himself, and to refrain from the goddamned litmus tests that immediately polarize and isolate moderates away from him. The very nature of your challenge belies a need to shame and exclude. I don't give a fuck what Hillary supporters think of me. I am calling for reasonable, civil discourse, and getting shite flung in my face for saying so.
I made my point, and most of the comments from poster with Bernie's picture as their avatar are proving my point. You want to slander and accuse and litmus-test, fine. Welcome to Hillary.
You know, when my avatar Abbie Hoffman endorsed George McGovern he was vilified for it by a similar crew of purists. I think it's foolish, and that is the point of my post.
I'm probably going to vote for Bernie in spite of the vitriol, because part of me thinks it's all right-wing rat-fucking designed to divide and destroy the party. A few trolls on either side starting a flame war that fulfills their purpose of damaging both candidates. Is this possibility not clear to you?
It's clear to me. Be as dismissive and mean-mouthed as the rest, go ahead. It fucks us all.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)That anyone would try to accuse me of being a paid troll or phony whatever. Jesus fuck, the primary season is just starting and people are LIVID and nasty if you question anything.
Discussing his lack of outreach on racial
issues that cannot be tied to his economic issues, they call you a troll and insist you're insinuating Sanders is a racist. Yet the very same people are in his group writing OPs agreeing he has an "optics" problem while insisting anyone else saying the same fucking thing in GD is a total troll. So much for their integrity.
I have never seen such paranoia and hatred directed toward long time DUers, it's fucking crazy. They will succeed in turning some good activists off, and most of us will just disregard whatever the unhinged haters say. It really has nothing to do wth Sanders and more with the foolish notion that trashing people here is a sort of effective political advocacy. Is guess they've never done any advocacy, because that involves winning people over and only a few quieter ones are courageous enough to admit they do need to win over voters.
Cha
(298,087 posts)Fortunately for Bernie.. he's not his supporters on the internet.
Mahalo byronius
byronius
(7,413 posts)Nice.
840high
(17,196 posts)make up your own mind?
byronius
(7,413 posts)The point of the post is not that I am easily confused. It is that vitriol repels.
Do you understand that?
Vitriol serves neither Bernie nor Hillary, who are friends; it serves no one except Scott Walker.
Do you understand what I'm saying, and do you have a comment relevant to that conclusion?
Or are you just kinda being mean without thinking about it? 'Cause that's what it sounds like.
My wife usually makes up my mind for me, actually. She's wicked smart. And she's not big on Hillary. But she keeps it rational and policy-oriented, and does not devolve to primate shite-throwing.
You know. Snark. Sound-bite wisdom. In place of thoughtful commentary. You get it.
Right?
840high
(17,196 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'll get called names, I'll get nasty PM's, I'll get alert on but I don't care for me it's more important to stick to my guns.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Just curious.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Cosmocat
(14,594 posts)I really like what sanders is doing, but I dont see hillary as the devil.
And, after a quarter century of republican bullshit slandering of her, if I wanted hillary hating bullshit id post at one of the thousands of right wing hell hole websites.
There are some bernie supporters here who get it, but there are a lot more who choose to alienate other democrats out of their emotional instability.
I am voting bernie and am going to support him regardless, but yeah, its hard to be here right now if you arent virulent about him.
byronius
(7,413 posts)Indeed.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)I have seen discussion of her historical record on issues I consider extremely important, as in my top 3-5 issues.
If discussion of her history on specific, critical issues, leaves some people favoring Hillary, that tells me what their real feeling is about those issues. So be it.
FSogol
(45,596 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)Walker.
But mock away, friend, mock away. Such power in your sarcasm, such wit, such deadly effect.
FSogol
(45,596 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)Great job! Awesome show!
So cool. You are so damned cool.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Some have also come back time after time with the same Clinton Foundations smack talk from Gowdy that has proven absolutely nothing except the fact some posters lack critical thinking skills. From claiming Clinton wants to privatize social security, to lying about Blumenthal, to raving about an Andrew Malcolm article. What they are is obvious. Each one of them increases Clintons favorability. It is why I don't even correct one of our west coasters anymore. From their own threads it is becoming clear that others, even supporters of other candidates, are catching on to the pattern.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)Sweet. Let's just splinter up and let them win, then. Good on you for being so pure.
'Burn the earth, but I got my ya-yas out.' Careless, short-sighted, and not in Bernie's interest, but great sound bite, bro!
morningfog
(18,115 posts)So what if steel yourself and make decisions based on a small anonymous discussion site? It is insignificant and meaningless. Vote for who you want. I simply don't believe that you or anyone else makes that decision in reaction to criticism on a political board.
byronius
(7,413 posts)And responding to an honest opinion with nothing but snark is counterproductive.
TBF
(32,155 posts)you can go here if you'd prefer that experience: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026766636
byronius
(7,413 posts)Some people feed off it; I think it's ugly, divisive, and stupid.
Bernie can answer those questions, I think, pretty concisely, without the flames and the accusations of treachery.
I hadn't seen that thread you posted. Bernie's answered all of those questions already, actually, in his series of interviews with Randi Rhodes. Heard any of those? They're great.
TBF
(32,155 posts)that you will see that kind of stuff from various people & they do it against Bernie as well. And they will start doing it against Martin O'Malley. Believe me, I doubt some of these folks are even dems. Political season gets pretty ugly - especially during the primaries.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)The vitriol on the board goes both ways and don't try to pretend it doesn't (not that it makes it right). I've tried a few times to intervene on both sides. As much as the Hillary Clinton supporters whine about her being attacked, but they don't give a fucking shit about civility. Their only purpose is to hold their noses high into the air and proclaim that Hillary has been crowned. Yes, I'm talking about her supporters NOT her.
The Hillary Clinton supporters march around demanding loyalty oaths. Really you think that is not some full on hate? Claiming that Sanders doesn't care about social issues or minorities. I've got plenty of other examples if you want them.
No, please go back to putting your hands over your ears and screaming "lah lah lah" like all the other ones". You are where you belong.
byronius
(7,413 posts)'Rat-fucking' to divide and conquer. Thought of that possibility?
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)But you continue to use whatever chuckleheaded argument you want to justify your decision.
Cha
(298,087 posts)lol
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)kpete
(72,057 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)You're the greatest of the all-time greats. But I'm confused by your graph -- what do you mean? That all of this noise and fury does not hurt the general cause?
If you say it, I'm listening.
kpete
(72,057 posts)http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2015_06/there_is_this_antihillary_vote055844.php
byronius
(7,413 posts)Would that we could coalesce.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)I hate to see either unfairly criticized. If one doesn't know what fair criticism is then you're who I'm talking about. Now a person is known by the company he keeps and in politics this applies to those that support you. So I understand your umbrage. You may want to wait until the primary debates and try to ignore anyone who cannot make a cogent argument.
byronius
(7,413 posts)Basic LA
(2,047 posts)Hillary hatred here was loud & strong long before Bernie appeared on the scene. Remember the draft Elizabeth Warren phase? Even before that there were those who said they wouldn't vote if Hillary was the nominee. Of course, not all Bernie supporters are of this ilk, but those of the original anti- Hillary groups have rallied around him now. It's within this tent that we'll find those who would rather the Republicans win than their arch-enemy, Hillary.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)the dismissing of bernie and bashing of his supporters makes me defente to stay home if he's not the nominee come november 2016.
viewing his record vs hers and voting for her means you were never really a fan of his.
byronius
(7,413 posts)I said the baseless invective and divisive rhetoric was pushing me toward her. I'll be voting for Bernie in spite of it. I think it's stupid and self-defeating, and probably right-wing-troll-prompted.
Flaming witch-hunt language doesn't serve either candidate.
You're actually going to stay home and not vote for the Democratic nominee? That's your right. I wouldn't want that blood on my hands. Scott Walker intends to murder the human race.
But stay pure, stay pure, all the way down.
Response to byronius (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)byronius
(7,413 posts)So much fun!
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)if the words on an obscure forum tucked away in a corner of the innertubes that has probably less than 500 regular posters makes up your mind on who to vote for... you have an extremely low bar.
I'm sorry; my fingers must have gotten away from me the first time.
byronius
(7,413 posts)It's great! You're the best.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)in a place where no one's gonna read it but us (the aforementioned 500), one tends to forget which people whose hair is on fire they've already replied to.
Sorry 'bout that.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)My German Shepard would make a great VP.
Rex
(65,616 posts)or who I vote for in the primaries. There are too many 'characters' here that are pushing their own agenda all day long, for me to really take some of them seriously.
Now I mostly just listen, but nobody really has that much affect on me here or anywhere on the WWW - in many ways I can tell some use it as mindless entertainment when they are bored with RL.
Those that do make me change my mind on issues do come along, but I rarely 'let someone make up my mind for me' in RL...so it ain't about to happen in the VW either lol.
byronius
(7,413 posts)Same here, just wish we could stay off the Fury Road.
Technically, we're supposed to be better than that.
In RL, however, primates are primates. I expect too much from the tribe.