General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsClinton Campaign's Lawyer sues to overturn new Wisconsin voter restrictions
Scott Walker's New Restrictive Voting Laws Challenged By Top Clinton Lawyer
By TIERNEY SNEED Published JUNE 1, 2015, 4:09 PM EDT 8644 Views
A series of Wisconsin voting restrictions signed into law by Gov. Scott Walker (R) are being challenged in lawsuit spearheaded by a lawyer associated with the Hillary Clinton campaign, MSNBC reported Monday.
The complaint, filed in federal court Friday, alleges, "These measures were intended to burden, abridge, and deny, and have had and will have the effect of burdening, abridging, and denying, the voting rights of Wisconsinites generally and of African-American, Latino, young, and/or Democratic voters in Wisconsin in particular."
Since coming into office after the 2010 elections, Walker and his counterparts in the statehouse have passed a number of new regulations to voting procedures. The challengers in Friday's complaint, which include get out the vote organizations and voters who say their franchise rights have been adversely impacted, suggest that the restrictions are an effort to curb the Wisconsin constituencies who voted for President Obama in droves in 2008 and 2012.
Marc Elias, an election law expert who is also general counsel to the Clinton campaign, filed the Wisconsin lawsuit. He filed a separate challenge last month to voting restrictions passed in Ohio under Republican Gov. John Kasich.
The Wisconsin complaint challenges a slew of election laws -- most of them enacted under Walker -- that include limitations to early voting, restrictions on voter registration, increases to residency requirements, restrictions to straight-ticket voting, absentee ballot restrictions, polling station requirements and stipulations that municipal clerks cannot return absentee ballots with mistakes to voters.
The laws are being challenged as a violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act as well as on various constitutional grounds.
Wisconsin's 2011 voter ID law, considered one of the strictest in the nation, had been blocked by a federal court in a previous challenge, only to see that decision overturned at the appeals level. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court declined to review that case.
more at:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/clinton-lawyer-challenges-walker-voting-laws
Read the full complaint below:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7iBFXmiN89QLU5NWkhhZnYzTkpDNHdYSE0xUXRCV2pfeWI0/view?pli=1
TDale313
(7,820 posts)We need to be fighting this shit, and Dems should be leading the way. It's politically smart and more important it's the right thing to do.
Frances
(8,548 posts)The lawsuit benefits ALL Democrats
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)This bodes well going forward.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)aspirant
(3,533 posts)Democratic DOJ also bombarding the courts?
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)to suggest they aren't taking a stand on the Voter ID laws is incorrect.
remember, just because you haven't heard doesn't mean they aren't active.
Cha
(298,077 posts)vadermike
(1,417 posts)Great news for us all !! Does anyone know if this will get to the federal judicial circuit? IE , where the President and Harry Reid put in a ton of our Judges last year to tilt the judiciary more our way? If so.. we could potentially have a better chance of winning these lawsuits....
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Someone needs to do this. Voter rights are important, and it's clear that Hillary's team supports that.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Cha
(298,077 posts)You just know Walker will cheat anyway he can to have Wisconsin go to a repub.. like him. arrgh
Paka
(2,760 posts)Overturning this law helps everyone on both sides of the aisle. A level playing field is all we ask and may the best candidate win.