General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Clinton: A lifetime champion of income opportunity
Last edited Tue Jun 2, 2015, 07:28 PM - Edit history (2)
Working to raise the minimum wage. Throughout her Senate career, Hillary Clinton was a staunch supporter of increasing the minimum wage and voted repeatedly to protect and increase it. She was an original cosponsor of the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007, and authored the 2006 and 2007 Standing with Minimum Wage Earners Act to tie Congressional salary increases to an increase in the minimum wage. As she said at the time, her bill would have ensured that every time Congress gives itself a raise in the future that Americans get a raise too. This is the right and fair thing to do for hardworking Americans.
Advocating for out-of-work Americans. Hillary Clinton has a record of working across the aisle to help out-of-work Americans. In what the New York Times called a case study of how legislative objectives can trump ideology, Clinton teamed up with Republican Senator Don Nickles of Oklahoma at the beginning of 2003 to help deliver added unemployment benefits to millions of Americans. Senator Clinton continued fighting to extend unemployment benefits for Americans who were out of work, cosponsoring amendments and bills to extend benefits through the end of 2003 and into 2004, and voting to provide emergency unemployment benefits during the 2008 financial crisis.
Getting equal pay for equal work. The Paycheck Fairness Act, which Hillary Clinton introduced in 2005 and 2007, would have amended the Fair Labor Standards Act to prevent employer retaliation against workers who claim wage discrimination, or workers who inquire about or discuss their wages. This concept was adopted, in part, by President Obamas April 2014 Executive Order prohibiting federal contractors from retaliating against employees who discuss their wages. Clinton also cosponsored the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, which became the first law signed by President Obama. The Act, which expanded workers rights to take pay discrimination issues to court, was also introduced in 2007 and was cosponsored by Clinton.
Fighting for middle-class tax cuts. As a Senator, Hillary Clinton supported progressive tax policies that required millionaires to pay their fair share. She opposed the Bush tax cuts in 2001 and 2003, and she supported a variety of middle-class tax cuts, including tax credits for student loan recipients, and keeping in place the tax cuts for those who make under $250,000 a year. Clinton has said that inherited wealth and concentrated wealth is not good for America, and she has consistently voted against repealing the estate tax on millionaires, doing so in 2001, 2002, and 2006.
Strengthening health care for millions of children. In the Senate, Hillary Clinton looked for ways to strengthen the State Childrens Health Insurance Program, introducing bills to allow states to expand the program that she helped create as First Lady. The program, created in 1997, has increased health coverage for millions of children in low-income and working families. Ted Kennedy, one of the lead sponsors of the bill, said the program wouldnt be in existence today if we didnt have Hillary pushing for it from the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue.
Fighting poverty as a private citizen. Hillarys first job out of law school was for the newly-formed Childrens Defense Fund, an organization she would later chair. The CDF has partnered with numerous organizations and worked with policy makers to build bipartisan support to enact laws that have helped millions of children fulfill their potential and escape poverty because they received the health care, child care, nurturing, proper nutrition and education they deserve. Today, as part of the Too Small to Fail Initiative to improve the health and well-being of children five and under, Hillary Clinton is working to close the word gap for kids in low-income families who often have smaller vocabularies than their classmates. Clinton points out that this disadvantage leads to further disparities in achievement and success over time, from academic performance and persistence to earnings and family stability even 20 and 30 years later.
Expanding access to early childhood education for children in lower-income families. Senator Clinton introduced the Ready to Learn Act with Republican Senator Kit Bond of Missouri to award competitive matching grants to schools, child care providers, and Head Start providers for voluntary full day pre-K for lower-income four-year olds. Clinton also joined with Bond on his Education Begins at Home Act to provide competitive grants for early childhood home visitation, including for families with English language learners. The Act also called for revisions to Early Head Start programs, including training in parenting skills and child development. Hillary Clinton also introduced her husband to the HIPPY program, which expanded early childhood education to economically disadvantaged families. As Newsweek reported in 1990, the Clintons became enthusiastic supporters of the program, helping to sponsor and gain funding for programs throughout the state. Newsweek also noted that, at the time, Nineteen of the 33 HIPPY programs in the United States were in Arkansas.
Strengthening healthcare for rural Arkansans. As the New York Times wrote in 1993, Her public involvement in policy issues began only a few months after her husband was inaugurated to his first term as Governor on Jan. 10, 1979, when he appointed her to be the chairwoman of the 44-member Rural Health Advisory Committee. Her work with that board in developing programs to expand health care in the states isolated farm and mountain country began a career of committee work on health and education issues. And as a board member of Arkansas Childrens Hospital she was credited with starting a process that has trained a generation of pediatricians to work in poor rural areas, and has made emergency care available for children across the state through a network of ambulances and helicopters.
Correct the Record. Fight the Republican Smears from Rand/Bush/Etc.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)murielm99
(30,787 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Certainly a path of income opportunity for everyone.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Cha
(298,087 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I wasn't planning to mention it, but you did ask for Hillary's accomplishments.
Cha
(298,087 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Platitudes for the masses, and 99% of income rises to the 1%. Won't be any better with Hillary...probably worse.
Cha
(298,087 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Hillary will represent you well.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/12/12/racial-wealth-gaps-great-recession/
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/todays-racial-wealth-gap-is-wider-than-in-the-1960s/
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)All the people who care so much about African Americans won't even look at it. Their concern is 100% FAKE.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Wish we could talk about this, but sadly DU ain't interested.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'd love to see it as one.
It is also part of a thread I did about Killer Mike. Watch the CNN video on the OP and you can hear him talk about jobs and poverty being a big giant issue in Ferguson.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/128010498
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I would encourage you to put into GD where it will get more interest.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I'll keep posting that graph until someone actually notices. It's real and it's important for people to understand just how bad it is. I'm too worn out for OPs for now. Maybe when I get pissed off again...
Number23
(24,544 posts)race issues, not in the forums where these communities are most likely to see but in the Sanders forum. And then say that people's concern is "fake" because we don't see it because you post in a forum that alot of people don't read. I really don't understand why you are so incensed over this and are choosing to participate the way that you are on this topic.
The gap between black/white wealth has grown considerably over the last 50 years. This predates Obama. By your own graph, it appears that the biggest gap was in 1989. The number of unemployed is a huge factor as is housing.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Although I think I might be on a few more ignore lists today, than I was on yesterday.
Number23
(24,544 posts)screamed at for "calling somebody a racist" because we want to discuss the monumentally important topic of race and how it affects every single aspect of life for millions of Americans. Posting these topics in forums that few remaining minority members visit is not exactly conducive to a good discussion on this.
As for being on ignore, I've always considered ignore the last bastion for the Easily Threatened. Some people need to use ignore because they have no self-control and can't respect other poster's wishes to be left alone but the majority of the time, people put others on ignore who challenges them in some way. Take it as the compliment that it is.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)You might try some personal reflection and maybe stop blaming other people for your problems?
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)She was but one member out of 10+.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Do check out the link to Correct Record.
Clear as daylight why over 2 million voters have signed on to Hillary's campaign website.
2016
^H^R^C
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)..here on DU.
Its a crown..its a coronation.
If they say it often enough, then so shall it be.
^H^R^C
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Advocating for out-of-work Americans. Hillary Clinton has a record of working across the aisle to help out-of-work Americans. In what the New York Times called a case study of how legislative objectives can trump ideology, Clinton teamed up with Republican Senator Don Nickles of Oklahoma at the beginning of 2003 to help deliver added unemployment benefits to millions of Americans. Senator Clinton continued fighting to extend unemployment benefits for Americans who were out of work, cosponsoring amendments and bills to extend benefits through the end of 2003 and into 2004, and voting to provide emergency unemployment benefits during the 2008 financial crisis.
Maybe if we have a better education system we would have people to take some of these jobs from our own soil. Also it is a global economy... and we need to be ready for that (but that certainly doesn't mean things need to get worse).
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)NOT to find workers in America to meet job qualifications that they want to hire for? There are plenty of American workers that can do many of the tech jobs. We STARTED the tech industry, and Silicon Valley was the world's high tech capitol until job outsourcing and these "guest worker" (aka indentured servant) programs have basically made high tech industry jobs hard for American citizens to work for at the pay they want to pay people, and had this high tech capitol moved to Bangalore, India instead.
Many smart kids would rather work getting a degree in medicine, law, or other profession that isn't as apt to be outsourced than spend a ton of money on a high tech degree these days that they won't get a return on their investment for. It's not about us not getting enough training. It is our companies not paying people adequately in our economy with these kind of job programs.
Heck even many of the H-1B workers don't like this program, as the one interviewed in this story shows.
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/Silicon-Valleys-Body-Shop-Secret-280567322.html
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Is that world economy at play, and it's only going to get worse as the internet continues to increase our connectivity. What's our real plan for how the world job market is going to shift over the next ten years? My job isn't safe? Is yours?
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)They are NOT needed and only benefit the wealthy who have bought our government, that some here don't seem to care about happening.
Immigration bills should help people who want to MOVE here and become CITIZENS here, and INVEST in being a part of our system, not just ones that want to come here to get a job and move back and have us INVEST in other economies instead (through payments shipped back to families of their salaries) and ultimately their experience moving to other locations too.
The "world economy" is something we can change and isn't something that the wealthy says is "unstoppable" just to keep being doctored to benefit themselves. We can bring back tariffs (that other countries engineer their laws to protect their own economies through things like VAT taxes) that we don't do here because our politicians only work for the wealthy here instead of the benefit of average Americans.
That is why you have bipartisan support in the American population against these so-called "free trade" deals too.
So-called "free trade" deals is what also leads to undocumented workers coming here from South America when we have such large farm subsidies to wealthy ag companies to help them "dump" lower priced farm products that average farmers can't compete with down south so they sell of their farms and come up here to work instead in more slave labor conditions.
It's all about a "race to the bottom" that our trade laws, etc. are creating, NOT some inherent "global trend" that can't be stopped.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Companies who use the H-1B visas may just leave the US altogether, as the world gets smaller they have less of a reason to be here.
Admittedly I do need to do more research on this topic.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... and then if they don't want to be "American companies" any more, then they will have to PAY to have access to selling in to this country then! And for those execs of those UnAmerican companies, they should get taxed a lot more too, to make up for the amount of money they "shelter" overseas, and if they don't like it, they can move the hell out of the country too!
quickesst
(6,283 posts)....from many blue collar workers. Remember us? Not long ago we were the racist flavor of the month for complaining about foreign workers taking jobs away from Americans by accepting lower wages. You remember, the "poor brown people who were only trying to make a better life for their families". Many of the accusers words, not mine. Then, it was easy being elitist while sitting in the ivory towers that I shed blood, sweat, and tears to build for them. I just imagine it doesn't feel very good when it comes back to bite them in the ass.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... who lost their jobs earlier, and also by your message saying that blue collar workers shouldn't sympathize with us.
This is just promoting division within our ranks. Why should we do that? We should all be working together against the effort of having us all work at jobs that they want to pay only depressed minimum wages for. Not to diminish those that work at those jobs as well, as often times many of those would be able to get better jobs, if they hadn't been outsourced by "free trade" jobs and "guest worker" programs. Your doing exactly what people like the Koch brothers want us to do. Divide ourselves while they take over.
Note that it isn't only H-1B jobs where people are getting screwed, though Hillary has been more vocal as noted here about expanding this guest worker program. Also, where a lot of less skilled workers are getting screwed is the H-2B worker. The abuse with that program was shown after Katrina, where Bushco used that to rebuild the south then, instead of hiring American workers who needed the work to rebuild their lives, and in that effort they screwed a lot of foreign workers even moreso than they do H-1B guest workers.
http://www.thenation.com/blog/198665/these-workers-came-overseas-help-rebuild-after-hurricane-katrina-and-were-treated-prison
Bernie has spoken out against both of these programs. Hillary apparently doesn't see how they are abused when she speaks out in favor of H-1B.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/25/this-is-a-massive-effort-to-attract-cheap-labor-why-sen-bernie-sanders-is-skeptical-of-guest-workers/
quickesst
(6,283 posts)...not all. As for the "support", I saw none other than from fellow blue collars. We were racists. Period. I was not, and I won't label you or any tech worker as such. Those that cannot see the differences in your plight and mine are not trying too hard. I am quite sure that my opinion will not have any part in the division you speak of. We have the primaries taking care of that.
I hope all do not lose their jobs. Just as I wish I hadn't lost mine. My company closed doors because they refused to abandon us for cheap, low quality labor. They simply could not compete with the low bidders. Of course they could handle the closure, but I still respected them for standing up for us. I was with them for almost 20 years.
On edit: Less skilled workers? Right. Not many of us blue collars could do your job, but by the same token, I'm willing to bet not many techs could do or stand up to ours.
Cha
(298,087 posts)and try to insert their squeaky negativity.
they're doing Bernie such an incredible amount of disservice.
SunSeeker
(51,814 posts)Exilednight
(9,359 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Exilednight
(9,359 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)riversedge
(70,466 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Champion of the working class. Thanks.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)nolabear
(42,007 posts)I can appreciate the valid criticism but it's totally overridden by the "OMG She's got money and she must have skeletons in her closet and she's the same person as her husband" stuff. It's embarrassing, really.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'd like to see more "issues" posts.
William769
(55,151 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I thought this was a Hillary-bashing thread.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)That was my Bernie support showing through apparently.
Corrected, thanks for the heads up!