General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJosh Duggar Is Not The Only One Who Escaped Prosecution
Josh Duggar Is Not The Only One Who Escaped ProsecutionBy Tamara Tabo
tabo.atl@gmail.com
May 29, 2015 at 10:32 PM
....
Permitting Abuse
Jim Bob and Michelles response to Joshs actions was not only a moral failure. It also may have been a crime in itself. ... Along with civil penalties for child maltreatment, permitting abuse of a minor counts as a criminal offense under Arkansas law. The offense is punishable as a felony when a parent recklessly fails to take action to prevent the sexual abuse of a minor. The statute provides a defense if the parent takes immediate steps to end the abuse of the minor, including prompt notification of a medical or law enforcement authority, upon first knowing or having good reason to know that abuse has occurred.
According to the police report, Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar learned that their daughters were being sexually abused in March 2002. Jim Bob also told police that in July 2002 Josh admitted to again fondling one of the girls while she slept. Nine months later, in March 2003, the report indicates that yet another incident occurred. There is no record of the Duggars notifying a doctor or, at that time, notifying law enforcement.
Instead, the family sent Josh to stay with a family friend from March 2003 to July 2003. When Josh returned home, his father took him to see Arkansas State Trooper Jim Hutchens, a personal acquaintance of the Duggars, who gave Josh no more than a very stern talk.
We now know that Hutchens himself would be later convicted of child pornography offenses. One wonders how stern his counsel not to touch the genitals of little girls could possibly have been. ... Even if the trip to see Hutchens counts as notification of law enforcement, July 2003 is a long time after the Duggars first learned of the abuse, certainly not the prompt response required by law.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I did a google search and couldn't figure out the right terms to use to find the answer. Anyway, it's what I said way back when this story first broke that if the parents didn't break the law at the time it should have been a law. Plus I still think that as homeschooling teachers they should have been required to report. They say that homeschooling parents aren't actually teachers, but I disagree. Of course judging by their teaching material I could be persuaded that I am wrong about them being teachers.
minidriver
(57 posts)a quick "stern talking to" from a close family friend wipes away all traces of guilt, and expunges any embarrassing police records.
If you don't fit in that mold, 77 generations of your family will be held permanently guilty.
At least, that's the way the RW media plays it.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)as they go along.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)And you show me a father that will let this go on, pretend not to know, has a bestie in child pornography ...or whatever, and I'd bet money Jim Bob just carried on the family secrets from his own childhood. Hey, they needed those girls for nannies. Even the 25 year old, unmarried one can't get out of the house, as per Jim Bob's ruling.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)There's more disgust & crime here than we probably know.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)From prison.
For me, the blame lays squarely on their shoulders. The kids need serious "help".