Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 12:31 PM Jun 2015

Why U.S. Billionaires May Not Be Able To Buy The 2016 Election

Florida Senator Marco Rubio has one; Texas Senator Ted Cruz has one; even former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, considered a longshot for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016, has a billionaire in his corner. Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has two.

Campaign finance watchdog groups fear heavy spending by these ultra-rich Americans will warp the election - already expected to be the most money-soaked in history. The idea that billionaires can buy elections has taken root in the public imagination.

Those billionaires are now seeing small, early signs of a pushback. Whether these are the beginning of a new trend is far too soon to say, but polls show there is wider discontent about the perceived influence of big money in U.S. politics and a growing gulf between the country's very rich and very poor.

These nascent rumblings - along with evidence that the super-rich are inefficient political spenders - raise questions about how effective billionaires will be in the 2016 elections.

Some voters in Philadelphia, for example, were turned off by the billionaires backing a top candidate in the city's May 19 mayoral race. And a Silicon Valley startup, Crowdpac, is hoping to bank on public ire against big political spenders to attract small donations to its new for-profit election campaign crowdfunding platform.

more...

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/02/us-usa-election-billionaires-idUSKBN0OI07I20150602

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why U.S. Billionaires May Not Be Able To Buy The 2016 Election (Original Post) Purveyor Jun 2015 OP
Each horse wears the colors of a different owner. Octafish Jun 2015 #1
Reminds me of Donald Sinclaire's buddies in the movie "Rat Race". bluesbassman Jun 2015 #2
The whold game is on blatant display in NH Mopar151 Jun 2015 #4
I pray you are correct! gopiscrap Jun 2015 #3
But people are far too willing to accept that "that's what it takes to win" BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #5

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
1. Each horse wears the colors of a different owner.
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 12:33 PM
Jun 2015

Ask not: Who pays the jockey? Ask, Who owns the track?

FWIW: All I can do is ask. I can't afford a ticket to get in to place a bet.

bluesbassman

(19,387 posts)
2. Reminds me of Donald Sinclaire's buddies in the movie "Rat Race".
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 12:46 PM
Jun 2015

Wonder who'll be the last servant left hanging on to the curtain rod?

Mopar151

(10,014 posts)
4. The whold game is on blatant display in NH
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 01:05 PM
Jun 2015

WMUR, Channel 9 (ABC) is NH's only major network affiliate. In short, you can see the extra "push" they give canidates with big PAC connections, in order to maximize their ad revenue.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
5. But people are far too willing to accept that "that's what it takes to win"
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 01:23 PM
Jun 2015

We'll see if their discontent is actually real.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why U.S. Billionaires May...