Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

H2O Man

(73,709 posts)
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 01:12 PM Jun 2015

Standard Blues Changes

There have been a few discussions regarding the differences between Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Martin O’Malley on DU:GD in the past month or so. Some of these include informative and valuable insights; others focus on the poster’s opinion; and at least two or three seem to be rather negative. Well, at least that’s my interpretation.

This morning, as I went on my daily walk -- and found a perfect flint arrowhead, circa 1300 ad -- I was thinking about what these three announced Democratic Party candidates have in common. I’m confident that the synergism of my being old and lacking in intelligence insures that my list is far from complete, but I thought it was important.

Each of the three is a superior choice, compared to the announced republican presidential candidates, or any potential republican who may enter the race.

Each of the three can win the national election; this is particularly true if the Democratic Party as a whole works for their election.

Each of the three could lose the election, if the party is divided.

Each of the three could be effective in getting meaningful legislation passed, if the party also works at electing/ re-electing good candidates to the House and Senate, and continues to put pressure upon our elected officials.

Each of the three could find it impossible to pass meaningful legislation, if we do not focus attention upon both Houses of Congress.

Each of the three has strengths and potential weaknesses, as all three are not only human beings, but are politicians.

I’m sure that there are more than this half-dozen common features. If you can think of more, I would appreciate it if you could list them.

Thanks,
H2O Man

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Standard Blues Changes (Original Post) H2O Man Jun 2015 OP
Perhaps I should H2O Man Jun 2015 #1
Each of the three democrank Jun 2015 #2
Important point! H2O Man Jun 2015 #3
it's I-IV-V now, but it'll be jazz when we hit the primaries. yorgatron Jun 2015 #4
Exactly what I was thinking. Glassunion Jun 2015 #5
Crap voicings whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #6
That sounds so nice, I might fire up the audio system tech3149 Jun 2015 #8
Thanks! H2O Man Jun 2015 #10
Interesting bigtree Jun 2015 #7
Right! H2O Man Jun 2015 #11
Woke up this morning... malthaussen Jun 2015 #9

H2O Man

(73,709 posts)
1. Perhaps I should
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 01:32 PM
Jun 2015

have noted that this is in DU Minor.

Reading some of the OP/threads indicates my essay may be out of tune. Oh, well.

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
8. That sounds so nice, I might fire up the audio system
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 03:21 PM
Jun 2015

I've got some direct to disc I haven't listened to in a while.

H2O Man

(73,709 posts)
10. Thanks!
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 04:34 PM
Jun 2015

I was listening to the "live" LP from the Plastic Ono Band's "Sometime in New York City" while writing the OP. I used part of a Frank Zappa quote from the concert where he played with the Lennons for the "title" of it. First thing that came to mind ....

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
7. Interesting
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 02:41 PM
Jun 2015

...how some arrowheads appear almost as perfect as the day they were chipped and honed; others more worn down by age and environment; some made of more durable material, others of more ephemeral composition; all arrowheads, to be sure, but maybe some more suited for different tasks.

I remind myself that these folks all chose public service, and that's not something everyone can handle. It's all about what you want these folks to do, I suppose. We all come to this process with a myriad of motivations, interests, and concerns. We'll choose the best candidate for the task we envision them undertaking; or, perhaps, we'll choose the one who's most available and is closest to being able to accomplish the task we have in mind.

H2O Man

(73,709 posts)
11. Right!
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 04:45 PM
Jun 2015

Earlier this spring, while walking the same path, I found a pristine Levanna point. It is at least 500 years older than the Madison today, and a lot larger. It was also paper-thin, by far the thinnest I've ever seen. But not a chip out of it. As crisp and sharp as the day it was made!

Systems are curious things. I'm sure that the vast majority of Democratic politicians enter the arena, for good reasons. They believe that they can improve people's quality of life, by way of the system. They may hope to institute much needed change within that system.

Yet, entering the national political arena is similar to falling into a river swollen by spring melts and rains. It takes you places in its strong currents and undercurrents. People begin to become aware of its true nature; they almost always adjust, to deal with the stark realities of the system; then, they get sucked in to the point that they become part of it. Most then begin to take the undercurrents for granted, and justify their compromising with it, but failing to examine if they have compromised themselves.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Standard Blues Changes