General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStandard Blues Changes
There have been a few discussions regarding the differences between Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Martin OMalley on DU:GD in the past month or so. Some of these include informative and valuable insights; others focus on the posters opinion; and at least two or three seem to be rather negative. Well, at least thats my interpretation.
This morning, as I went on my daily walk -- and found a perfect flint arrowhead, circa 1300 ad -- I was thinking about what these three announced Democratic Party candidates have in common. Im confident that the synergism of my being old and lacking in intelligence insures that my list is far from complete, but I thought it was important.
Each of the three is a superior choice, compared to the announced republican presidential candidates, or any potential republican who may enter the race.
Each of the three can win the national election; this is particularly true if the Democratic Party as a whole works for their election.
Each of the three could lose the election, if the party is divided.
Each of the three could be effective in getting meaningful legislation passed, if the party also works at electing/ re-electing good candidates to the House and Senate, and continues to put pressure upon our elected officials.
Each of the three could find it impossible to pass meaningful legislation, if we do not focus attention upon both Houses of Congress.
Each of the three has strengths and potential weaknesses, as all three are not only human beings, but are politicians.
Im sure that there are more than this half-dozen common features. If you can think of more, I would appreciate it if you could list them.
Thanks,
H2O Man
H2O Man
(73,709 posts)have noted that this is in DU Minor.
Reading some of the OP/threads indicates my essay may be out of tune. Oh, well.
democrank
(11,115 posts)would offer a sensible choice for the Supreme Court should a vacancy occur.
~PEACE~
H2O Man
(73,709 posts)Thank you!
yorgatron
(2,289 posts)[img][/img]
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)Straight up 12-bar. I do prefer a nice shuffle.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)tech3149
(4,452 posts)I've got some direct to disc I haven't listened to in a while.
I was listening to the "live" LP from the Plastic Ono Band's "Sometime in New York City" while writing the OP. I used part of a Frank Zappa quote from the concert where he played with the Lennons for the "title" of it. First thing that came to mind ....
bigtree
(86,021 posts)...how some arrowheads appear almost as perfect as the day they were chipped and honed; others more worn down by age and environment; some made of more durable material, others of more ephemeral composition; all arrowheads, to be sure, but maybe some more suited for different tasks.
I remind myself that these folks all chose public service, and that's not something everyone can handle. It's all about what you want these folks to do, I suppose. We all come to this process with a myriad of motivations, interests, and concerns. We'll choose the best candidate for the task we envision them undertaking; or, perhaps, we'll choose the one who's most available and is closest to being able to accomplish the task we have in mind.
Earlier this spring, while walking the same path, I found a pristine Levanna point. It is at least 500 years older than the Madison today, and a lot larger. It was also paper-thin, by far the thinnest I've ever seen. But not a chip out of it. As crisp and sharp as the day it was made!
Systems are curious things. I'm sure that the vast majority of Democratic politicians enter the arena, for good reasons. They believe that they can improve people's quality of life, by way of the system. They may hope to institute much needed change within that system.
Yet, entering the national political arena is similar to falling into a river swollen by spring melts and rains. It takes you places in its strong currents and undercurrents. People begin to become aware of its true nature; they almost always adjust, to deal with the stark realities of the system; then, they get sucked in to the point that they become part of it. Most then begin to take the undercurrents for granted, and justify their compromising with it, but failing to examine if they have compromised themselves.
malthaussen
(17,241 posts)-- Mal