Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe have a 'do not call directory', so why not
a 'do not send advertising emails'? (if 'do not call... isn't against Freedome Of Speech, then
'do not send adv.... shouldn't be either?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 698 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We have a 'do not call directory', so why not (Original Post)
clydefrand
Jun 2015
OP
There was a bill enacted in 2003 that allows for such a list and was supposed to 'can spam'...
PoliticAverse
Jun 2015
#1
I get the lack of authentication part, and have mixed feelings. Part of me would love
Exilednight
Jun 2015
#4
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)1. There was a bill enacted in 2003 that allows for such a list and was supposed to 'can spam'...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN-SPAM_Act_of_2003
CAN-SPAM allows the FTC to implement a national do-not-email list similar to the FTC's popular National Do Not Call Registry against telemarketing, or to report back to Congress why the creation of such a list is not currently feasible. The FTC soundly rejected this proposal, and such a list will not be implemented. The FTC concluded that the lack of authentication of email would undermine the list, and it could raise security concerns.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)4. I get the lack of authentication part, and have mixed feelings. Part of me would love
To see an email address assigned to each individual, but I also like the idea of anonymity.
Maybe the best solution would be to outlaw selling email lists.
raccoon
(31,136 posts)2. I'm down with that! Once somebody starts sending you spam emails, you NEVER get rid of them. nt
Response to raccoon (Reply #2)
xfundy This message was self-deleted by its author.