Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
1. There was a bill enacted in 2003 that allows for such a list and was supposed to 'can spam'...
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 04:30 PM
Jun 2015
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN-SPAM_Act_of_2003

CAN-SPAM allows the FTC to implement a national do-not-email list similar to the FTC's popular National Do Not Call Registry against telemarketing, or to report back to Congress why the creation of such a list is not currently feasible. The FTC soundly rejected this proposal, and such a list will not be implemented. The FTC concluded that the lack of authentication of email would undermine the list, and it could raise security concerns.


Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
4. I get the lack of authentication part, and have mixed feelings. Part of me would love
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 05:00 PM
Jun 2015

To see an email address assigned to each individual, but I also like the idea of anonymity.

Maybe the best solution would be to outlaw selling email lists.

Response to raccoon (Reply #2)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We have a 'do not call di...