eom

I think it is great.

It's a right turn arrow.

To me, putting the opposite way would look like it is going forward. However, I assume that they focus grouped both ways to see what worked better. I doubt Obama won BECAUSE of his logo -- and doubt that any candidate's standing is influenced by the quality of their logo.

Personally, I thought it ugly when I first saw it, but I am impressed after seeing it used with other colors and images superimposed on it.

Reagrdless of what anybody with too much time on his hands wants to attribute to it.

And it sure as hell doesn't warrant thousands of words of analysis.

But I guess if you're trying to sell a crappy political candidate as a brand, and you don't want anybody to ask a lot of questions, you need a snappy logo.

And the ability to express it in interesting ways is definitely here.

It may not warrant analysis by you, but it does for others.

Otherwise this world would be a narrow, dull and uninteresting place.

I have no great love of fonts, for example, but there are some really great analytical pieces out there that when you read them, you understand more of what marketing is, interpretation and intent behind all sorts of materials.

To dismiss outright says more of you than people "with too much time on [their] hands"

A logo is the province of advertising, not of issue raising. I prefer my presidents with a greater interest in policy rather than salesmanship.

Hillary should just go home.

Wherever that is.

President Sanders should have been President a long time ago.

Do you like peace?

Vote for Bernie.

Do you like responsibility?

Vote for Bernie.

"Wherever that is."

Be careful what you wish for.

The White House was her home for 8 years.

I would have no problem with her going home. Of course, I'd have no problem with Bernie in the White House either.

^G^O. ^H^O^M^E ^H^I^L^L^A^R^Y

MPOTUS 2016

In January 2017 it will hopefully be 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington DC.

Exactly. ..... And very apropos.

the election at all. I think this "controversy" is not worth a moment of anyone's time.

It would be laughable.

The only people crabbing about the logo are people who are not fans of the candidate. If their favorite had come up with an essentially similar logo, they'd be praising it to the skies.

Not even subtle, some of the carping...

Are people crabbing or carping?

Stop trying to mussel in on the action.

You WIN the thread!

I'm sure you'll be singing a different tuna in a minnow!

Glad it's officially perfect.

..."deep " thoughts about superficial bullshit are as good a distraction as anything.

Sid

At least now she's being honest about her move to the right...

I mean, we read left to right here. The letter is in that direction. Setting it to the left like that just looks very awkward and stilted.

I hate it.

Progressives move forward...we read left to right for crying out loud.

Put Hillary's logo on my Tshirt and it points to my left.

No, thanks.

You also realize that she didn't single handedly send troops to Iraq right?

I get it she certainly voted for the resolution I don't deny that... But she did not "cause" the war.

A republican in the White House caused the war, people in power lying to the nation helped "cause" the war.

There never was a perfect era. All we can keep doing is pushing ahead and fighting for our future.

What is interesting about it I think ,is that the logo by it's design will evolve as the campaign picks up steam moving the train along at a progressive pace. The logo at some point in the action will be given voice or will take on voice. The controversy surrounding the launch of the logo adds to it's mystique. It speaks now though not yet recognized in depth.

Even if you don't like the candidate ,the message is a good one. How bout, (lets keep the country moving in the right direction.)
The reverse direction could be a reflection of setting it back or turning it back. Pointing upward could reflect moving on and up or even up through the dome, however one will choose to view it in voice. And down of course pointing downward could be a reflection of well, thumbs down ,or you know, the the GOP's way.

So you can look at it in multiple perspectives or you can look at it to say one definitive thing . What it comes down to is it's all in how you see it. The thing of it is ,it will evolve by it's design as the campaign picks up momentum. If the voice becomes one collective voice nation wide, the republican party will return to it's former republican reform party tactics as a result of it !

Young republican reformers ring any bells ! Oh Ronnie !

Therefore, it *is* perfect.

I stopped caring about their opinion years ago.

One can drop stock photo images into any shape.

Whatever you feel about Hillary will be reflected in how you see her logo.

or a family unit that'll have to stick together until the girl's 50 because enough people figured that "if a candidate has boobs, that means they won't wreck the economy or continue endless war"

If it was perfect, you shouldn't have to keep justifying it.

The logo is Hillary's calling card. It's important. Though I admit, nothing is going to convert me to Hillary unless she walks back her "purple triangulation" speech, comes out against TPP, and develops a welfare policy that's both a true safety net as well as a ladder out of poverty, I still wish the woman with the best chance to become the first female POTUS was a woman I'd want to vote for. Therefore, I'm throwing in some friendly logo advice.

The current logo isn't a winner. Stop defending it: start looking for a new one.

Btw, I was just reading a book called "Just My Type" that claims the Gotham typeface helped Obama win in 2008.

This just proves she is a republican. just in case